Abstract
Mirativity is a distinct grammatical category. In the literature, no mirative marker has been identified so far in Mandarin Chinese. This paper aims to argue that Mandarin Chinese is a language that has grammatical means of expressing mirativity. The sentence-final particle le (SF le) in Mandarin is a mirative marker in its own right. It encodes the information as newsworthy or surprising and occurs with different time references and Illocutions. Based on the data from SF le, this paper extends the definition of mirativity given by Hengeveld & Olbertz (2012) by proposing that mirativity can not only be targeted towards either the speaker or the addressee, but also towards both. Lastly, it is argued that mirativity should be accounted for at the layer of Communicated Content at the Interpersonal Level in Functional Discourse Grammar.
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2012. The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology 16. 435-485.10.1515/lity-2012-0017Search in Google Scholar
Cao, Guangshun. 1987. 语气词“了”源流浅说(A simple investigation into the source of the mood marker “le”). Linguistic Researches (语文研究) (2). 10-15.Search in Google Scholar
Chang, Miao-hsia. 1998. The discourse functions of Taiwanese Kong in relation to its grammaticalization. Selected papers from the second international symposium on languages in Taiwan. 111-127. Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co., Ltd.Search in Google Scholar
Chen, Hu. 2007. 基于语音库的汉语感叹句与感叹语调研究 (A study of Chinese exclamatory sentence and intonation based on sound corpus). Chinese Language Learning (汉语学习) 5. 45-55.Search in Google Scholar
Chen, Qianrui. 2005. 句尾 “了”将来时间用法的发展(The development of sentence final le to express the future). Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies (语言教学与研究)1.66-73.Search in Google Scholar
Chen, Zhong. 2002. “了”的隐现规律及其成因考察(The motivation of the covert and overt form of the variation of “le”). Chinese Language Learning (汉语学习)1. 22-27.Search in Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 1997. Mirativity: the grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1(1). 33-52.10.1515/lity.1997.1.1.33Search in Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 2001. The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33 (3). 369-382.10.1016/S0378-2166(01)80001-1Search in Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott 2012. Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology 16 (3).529-564.10.1515/lity-2012-0020Search in Google Scholar
Fang, Hongmei & Hengeveld, Kees. (subm.) The sentence-final particle ba in Mandarin: A Functional Discourse Grammar perspective.Search in Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Mackenzie, J. Lachlan. 2008. Functional discourse grammar: A typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.0015Search in Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Olbertz, Hella. 2012. Didn’t you know? Mirativity does exist! Linguistic Typology 16. 487-503.10.1515/lity-2012-0018Search in Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees 2017, A hierarchical approach to grammaticalization. In: Kees Hengeveld, Heiko Narrog & Hella Olbertz eds. (2017),The grammaticalization of tense, aspect, modality, and evidentiality: A functional perspective (Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 311). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton, 13-38.Search in Google Scholar
Huang, Borong & Liao, Xudong. 2015. 现代汉语(Modern Chinese). Beijing: Higher Education Press.Search in Google Scholar
Jin, Lixin. 2003. “S了”的时体意义及其句法条件 (The grammatical meaning of “S+le” structure and its syntactic requirements). Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies (语言教学与研究) 2. 38-48.Search in Google Scholar
Kroon, Caroline. 1995. Discourse Particles in Latin (Amsterdam Studies in Classical Philology 4). Amsterdam: Gieben.Search in Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. and Thompson, Sandra A. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, CA, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar
Liu, Bin. 2015. The mirative use of “怎么” in Mandarin Chinese and its semantic consequence. In Q. Lu and H.H. Gao (Eds.): Chinese lexical semantics. Switzerland: Springer, 74-82.Search in Google Scholar
Liu, Xunning. 2002. 现代汉语句尾“了”的语法意义及其解说 (The grammatical meaning of the modal particle le and its explanation) . Chinese Teaching in the World (世界汉语教学) 61. 70-79.Search in Google Scholar
Lü, Shuxiang. 2015. 中国文法要略 (An outline of Chinese grammar). Beijing: The Commercial Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lü, Shuxiang. 2016. 现代汉语八百词 (800 Words in Modern Chinese). Beijing: The Commercial Press. Matthews, Stephen. 1998. Evidentiality and mirativity in Cantonese: wo5, wo4, wo3! Unpublished Ms., University of Hong Kong.Search in Google Scholar
Mei, Zulin. 1981. 现代汉语完成貌句式和词尾的来源 (Aspect sentences and sources of suffixes in Modern Chinese). Language Research (语言研究)1. 65-77.Search in Google Scholar
Olbertz, Hella. 2012. The place of exclamative and mirative in grammar-A functional discourse grammar view. Revista LinguíStica 8. 76-98.Search in Google Scholar
Paul, Waltraud. 2014. Why particles are not particular: sentence-final particles in Chinese as heads of a split CP. Studia Linguistica 68(1). 77-115.10.1111/stul.12020Search in Google Scholar
Peng, Lizhen. 2009. 论一种对情态敏感的“了2” (Le2 in imperative sentences: A modality-oriented particle). Studies of the Chinese Language (中国语文) 333. 506-517.Search in Google Scholar
Peterson, Tyler. 2017. Problematizing mirativity. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15:2. 312-342.10.1075/rcl.15.2.02petSearch in Google Scholar
Risselada, Rodie. 1993. Imperatives and other directive expressions in Latin: A study in the pragmatics of a dead language. Amsterdam: J.C. Gieben.10.1163/9789004408975Search in Google Scholar
Shen, Jiaxuan. 1995. “有界”与“无界” (Bounded and unbounded). Studies of the Chinese Language (中国语文) 248. 367-380.Search in Google Scholar
Shi, Jinsheng. 2000. 传信语气词“的”“了”“呢”的共现顺序(The co-occurrence sequence of the evidential modal particles de, le, ne). Chinese Language Learning (汉语学习) 5. 32-35.Search in Google Scholar
Shi, Yuzhi. 1992. 论现代汉语的“体”范畴(The aspect category in Modern Chinese). Social Sciences in China (中国社会科学) 6. 183-200.Search in Google Scholar
Soh, Hooi Ling 2014. Aspect. In: C.-T. James Huang, Y.-H. Audrey Li &Andrew Simpson eds. (2014). The Handbook of Chinese Linguitics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 126-155.Search in Google Scholar
Tao, Huan & Li, Jialiang. 2009. 方言和修辞的研究接面-兼论上海话”伊讲“的修辞动因(The interface between dialects and rhetoric: The rhetoric motivation of Yi Jiang in Shanghai Dialect). Rhetoric Studies (修辞学习) 3. 1-8.Search in Google Scholar
Wang, Jian. 2013. 一些南方方言中来自言说动词的意外范畴标记 (From say verbs to mirative markers). Dialects (方言) 2.111-119.Search in Google Scholar
Wang,Yufang, Tsai,Meichi, Schams, Wayne, et al. 2013. Restrictiveness, exclusivity, adversativity, and mirativity: Mandarin Chinese zhishi as an affective diminutive marker in spoken discourse. Chinese Language and Discourse 4(2). 181-228.Search in Google Scholar
Xu, Jingning. 2008. 情态表达与时体表达的相互渗透 (The mutual evolutions between the modal system and the tense-aspect system). Chinese Langauge Learning (汉语学习)1. 28-36.Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, Niina Ning. 2013. Encoding unexpectedness by aspect inflection. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 39(1). 23-57.Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, Mengru. 2009. “S了”的时体意义 (The tense and aspect meanings of “S le”). Anhui Literature (安徽文学) 2. 304.Search in Google Scholar
Zhu, Dexi. 2015. 语法讲义 (Lectures on grammar). Beijing: The Commercial Press.Search in Google Scholar
Zong, Shouyun. 2015. 晋方言情态动词“待”及其否定关联和意外性质 (Negativity and mirativity: A case study of dai as an auxiliary in Jin dialects). Studies of the Chinese Language (中国语文) 367. 341-351.Search in Google Scholar
© by Hongmei Fang, published by De Gruyter
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
