Studying robots outside the lab: HRI as ethnography

References

[1] L. Neven, C. Leeson, Beyond determinism: understanding actual use of social robots by older people, In: D. Prendergast, C. Chiara (Eds.), Aging and the Digital Life Course, Berghahn, 2015, 84-10210.2307/j.ctt9qdb6b.10Search in Google Scholar

[2] A. Lazar, H. J. Thompson, A. M. Piper, G. Demiris, Rethinking the design of robotic pets for older adults, In: DIS’16 Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference, (2016, Brisbane, Australia), Queensland, 1034-104610.1145/2901790.2901811Search in Google Scholar

[3] G. Balthus, D. Fox, F. Gemperle, J. Goetz, T. Hirsch, D. Magaritis, et al., Towards personal service robots for the elderly, WIRE-2000, Workshop on Interactive Robots and Entertainment (2000, Pittsburgh, USA), Pennsylvania, https://www.ri.cmu.edu/publications/towards-personalservice- robots-for-the-elderly/Search in Google Scholar

[4] M. A. Goodrich, A. C. Shultz, Human-robot interaction: a survey, Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction, 2008, 7 (3), 203-27510.1561/1100000005Search in Google Scholar

[5] L. Blond, F.Olesen, Unpacking the cultural baggage of travelling robots - how socially assistive robots are integrated in practice, In: C. Hasse, D. M. Søndergaard (Eds.), Designing Robots, Designing Humans, Routledge, 2019 (in press)10.4324/9781315227207-8Search in Google Scholar

[6] M. M. A. de Graaf, S. Ben Allouch, Evaluation of a socially assistive robot in eldercare, HRI’14 (2014, Bielefeld, Germany), ACM PressSearch in Google Scholar

[7] C. Hasse,Multistable roboethics, In: J. K. B. O. Friis, R. P. Crease (Eds.), Technoscience and Postphenomenology - The Manhattan Papers, Lexington Books, 2015, 169-189Search in Google Scholar

[8] C. Leeson, Anthropomorphic Robots on the Move, PhD thesis, University of Copenhagen, 2017Search in Google Scholar

[9] W-Y. G. Louie, D. McColl, G. Nejat, 2014, Acceptance and attitudes toward a human-like socially assistive robot by older adults, Assistive Technology, 2014, 26(3), 140-15010.1080/10400435.2013.869703Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] J. Robertson, Robo sapiens japanicus: robots, gender, family, and the Japanese nation, University of California Press, 201710.1525/california/9780520283190.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[11] H. I. Christensen (Ed.), A roadmap for US robotics: from internet to robotics, Technical Report, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2009Search in Google Scholar

[12] C. Hasse, Artefacts that talk: mediating technologies as multistable signs and tools, Subjectivity, 2013, 6(1), 79-10010.1057/sub.2012.29Search in Google Scholar

[13] K. Darling, Extending legal protection to social robots: the effects of anthropomorphism, empathy, and violent behavior towards robotic object, We Robot Conference (2012, Miami, USA), Florida, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.204479710.2139/ssrn.2044797Search in Google Scholar

[14] P. Lin, Introduction to robot ethics, In: P. Lin, K. Abney, G. A. Bekey (Eds.), Robot Ethics - The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics, The MIT Press, 2012, 3-17Search in Google Scholar

[15] M. M. A. de Graaf, S. Ben Allouch, J. A. G. M. van Dijk, 2016, Long-term acceptance of social robots in domestic environments: insights from a user’s perspective, In: AAAI Spring SymposiumSeries, AAAI Publications, 2016, https://www.aaai.org/ ocs/index.php/SSS/SSS16/paper/view/12692Search in Google Scholar

[16] M. H. Bruun, S. Hanghøj, C. Hasse, Studying social robots in practiced places, Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 2015, 19(2), 143-16510.5840/techne20159833Search in Google Scholar

[17] I. Leite, C. Martinho, A. Paiva, Social robots for long-term interaction: a survey, International Journal of Social Robotics, 2013, 5(2), 291-30810.1007/s12369-013-0178-ySearch in Google Scholar

[18] Y. Fernaeus, M. Håkansson, M. Jacobsson, S. Ljungblad, How do you play with a robotic toy animal? A long-term study of Pleo, In: IDC’ 10 Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, (2010, Barcelona, Spain), https://doi.org/10.1145/1810543.181054910.1145/1810543.1810549Search in Google Scholar

[19] J. Fink, V. Bauwens, F. Kaplan, P. Dillenbourg, Living with a vacuum cleaning robot - a 6-month ethnographic study, International Journal of Social Robotics, 2013, 5(3), 389-40810.1007/s12369-013-0190-2Search in Google Scholar

[20] T. Fong, I. Nourbakhsh, K. Dautenhahn, A survey of socially interactive robots, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2003, 42(3-4), 143-16610.1016/S0921-8890(02)00372-XSearch in Google Scholar

[21] H. Hüttenrauch, K.S. Eklundh, K. S. Fetch-and-carry with CERO: observations from a long-term user study with a service robot, In: Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (2002, Berlin, Germany), 158-163Search in Google Scholar

[22] C. D. Kidd, C. Breazeal, Robots at home: understanding longterm interaction, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (2008, Nice, France), https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2008.465111310.1109/IROS.2008.4651113Search in Google Scholar

[23] A. M. von der Pütten, N. C. Krämer, S. C. Eimler, Living with a robot companion - empirical study on the interaction with an Artificial Health Advisor, ICM’11 (2011, Alicante, Spain) https:// doi.org/10.1145/2070481.207054410.1145/2070481.2070544Search in Google Scholar

[24] J. Sung, H. I. Christensen, R. E. Grinter, Robots in thewild: understanding long-term use, HRI’09 (2009, La Jolla, USA) California, ACM Press10.1145/1514095.1514106Search in Google Scholar

[25] C. May, R. Harrison, T. Finch, A. MacFarlane, F. Mair, P. Wallace, Understanding the normalization of telemedicine services through qualitative evaluation, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2003, 10(6), 596-60410.1197/jamia.M1145Search in Google Scholar

[26] K. Dautenhahn, A. Billard, Bringing up robots or - the psychology of socially intelligent robots: from theory to implementation, In: Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Conference on Autonomous Agents (1999, Seattle, USA), Washington, https: //doi.org/10.1145/301136.30123710.1145/301136.301237Search in Google Scholar

[27] C. Breazeal, Toward sociable robots, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2003, 42(3-4), 167-175, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00373-110.1016/S0921-8890(02)00373-1Search in Google Scholar

[28] M. Alač, Social robots: things or agents? AI & Society, 2016, 31(4), 519-53510.1007/s00146-015-0631-6Search in Google Scholar

[29] K. Dautenhahn, Design spaces and niche spaces of believable social robots, In: Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (2002, Berlin, Germany), https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2002.104562110.1109/.2002.1045621Search in Google Scholar

[30] C. Bartneck, J. Forlizzi, A design-centered framework for social human-robot interaction, International Workshop on Robot and Human InteractiveCommunication, (2004 Kurashik, Japan), https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2004.137482710.1109/.2004.1374827Search in Google Scholar

[31] S. Zhao, Humanoid social robots as medium of communication, New Media Society, 2006, 8(3), 401-41910.1177/1461444806061951Search in Google Scholar

[32] D. Feil-Seifer, M. J. Matarić, Defining socially assistive robotics, In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (2005, Chicago, USA), https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR.2005.150114310.1109/ICORR.2005.1501143Search in Google Scholar

[33] A. Pickering, The mangle of practice - time, agency, and science, University of Chicago Press, 199510.7208/chicago/9780226668253.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[34] A. Giddens, The Constitution of Society - Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Polity Press, 1984Search in Google Scholar

[35] M. Pantzar, E. Shove, Understanding innovation in practice: a discussion of the production and re-production of Nordic Walking, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 2010, 22(4), 447-46110.1080/09537321003714402Search in Google Scholar

[36] A. Reckwitz, Toward a theory of social practices - a development in culturalist theorizing, European Journal of Social Theory, 2002, 32(2), 243-26310.1177/13684310222225432Search in Google Scholar

[37] E. Shove, M. Pantzar, M. Watson, The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How it Changes, SAGE, 201210.4135/9781446250655Search in Google Scholar

[38] M. Alač, Moving android: on social robots and body-ininteraction, Social Studies of Science, 2009, 39(4), 491-52810.1177/0306312709103476Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[39] M. Alač, J. Movellan, F. Tanaka, When a robot is social: spatial arrangements and multimodal semiotic engagement in the practice of social robotics, Social Studies of Science, 2011, 41(6), 893-926, https://doi.org/10.1177/030631271142056510.1177/0306312711420565Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[40] M. Alač, Points to and shakes the robot’s hand - Intimacy as situated interactional maintenance of humanoid technology, Zeitschrift für Medienwissenhaft, 2016, 15, http://www.zfmedienwissenschaft.de/online/points-andshakes- robots-handSearch in Google Scholar

[41] A. R. Guevara, Techno-modeling care: racial branding, dis/embodied labor, and “Cybraceros” in South Korea, Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 2015, 36(3), 139-19610.5250/fronjwomestud.36.3.0139Search in Google Scholar

[42] L. Blond, K. Schiølin, Lost in translation: getting to grips with multistable technology in an apparently stable world, In: J. Aagaard, J. K. B. O. Friis, J. Sorenson, O. Tafdrup, C. Hasse (Eds.), Postphenomenological methodologies: New ways in mediating techno-human relationships, Rowan & Littlefield International, 2018, 151-167Search in Google Scholar

[43] C. A. Davies, Reflexive ethnography - a guide to researching selves and others, Routledge, 2008Search in Google Scholar

[44] M. Hammersley, P. Atkinson, Ethnography - principles in practice - third edition, Routledge, 2007Search in Google Scholar

[45] N. K. Denzin, The Research Act, Aldine Publishing, 1970Search in Google Scholar

[46] S. Kvale, Doing Interviews, SAGE, 200710.4135/9781849208963Search in Google Scholar

[47] P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, Analysing documentary realities, In: D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative Research - Theory, Method and Practice, SAGE, 1997, 45-63Search in Google Scholar

[48] K. Hastrup, Getting it right - knowledge and evidence in anthropology, Anthropological Theory, 2004, 4(4), 455-47210.1177/1463499604047921Search in Google Scholar

[49] D. Forsythe, “It’s just a matter of common sense”: ethnography as invisible work,Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1999, 8(1-2), 127-14510.1023/A:1008692231284Search in Google Scholar

[50] C. Hasse, An Anthropology of Learning - On Nested Frictions in Cultural Ecologies, Springer, 201510.1007/978-94-017-9606-4Search in Google Scholar

[51] S. Šabanović, Robots in society, society in robots, International Journal of Social Robots, 2010, 2(4), 439-45010.1007/s12369-010-0066-7Search in Google Scholar

[52] L. Suchman, Human-machine reconfigurations - plans and situated actions, Cambridge University Press, 200710.1017/CBO9780511808418Search in Google Scholar

[53] J. Sung, H. I. Christensen, R. E. Grinter, Domestic robot ecology: an initial framework to unpack long-term acceptance of robots at home, International Journal of Social Robotics, 2010, 2(4), 417-42910.1007/s12369-010-0065-8Search in Google Scholar

[54] D. Ihde, Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth, Indiana University Press, 1990Search in Google Scholar

[55] R. Rosenberger,Multistability and agency of mundane artefacts - from speed bumbs to subway benches, Human Studies, 2014, 37(3), 369-39210.1007/s10746-014-9317-1Search in Google Scholar

[56] E. M. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations, Free Press, 2003Search in Google Scholar

[57] J. D. Eveland, Issues in using the concept of “adoption of innovation”, Journal of Technology Transfer, 1979, 4(1), 1-1310.1007/BF02177710Search in Google Scholar

[58] C. R. May, M. Johnson, T. Finch, Implementation, context and complexity, Implementation Science, 2016, 11(141), 1-12, https: //doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0506-310.1186/s13012-016-0506-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[59] J. D. Eveland, Diffusion, technology transfer, and implementation - thinking and talking about change, Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1986, 8(2), 303-32210.1177/107554708600800214Search in Google Scholar

[60] W. E. Bijker, Do not despair: there is life after constructivism, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 1993, 18(1), 113-13810.1177/016224399301800107Search in Google Scholar

[61] R. Kline, T. Pinch, User as agents of technological change: the social construction of the automobile in the rural united states, Technology and Culture, 1996, 37(4), 763-79510.2307/3107097Search in Google Scholar

[62] P. Rosen, The social construction of mountain bikes: technology and postmodernity in the cycle industry, Social Studies of Science, 1993, 23(3), 479-51310.1177/0306312793023003003Search in Google Scholar

[63] M. Akrich, The description of technical objects, In: W. E. Bijker, J. Law (Eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, The MIT Press, 1992, 119-138Search in Google Scholar

[64] E. Philips, K. E. Schaefter, D. R. Billings, F. Jentsch, P. A. Hancock, Human-animal teams as an analog for future human robot teams: influencing design and fostering trust, Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 2016, 5(1), 100-12510.5898/JHRI.5.1.PhillipsSearch in Google Scholar

[65] P.-P. Verbeek, What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design, The Pennsylvania State University Press, 200510.1515/9780271033228Search in Google Scholar

[66] O. Korkman, K. Storbacka, B. Harald, Practices as markets: value co-creation in e-voicing, Australasian Marketing Journal, 2010, 18(4), 236-247, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2010. 07.00610.1016/j.ausmj.2010.07.006Search in Google Scholar

[67] E. Shove, F. Trentmann, R. Wilk, Time, consumption and everyday life - practice, materiality and culture, Berg, 200910.5040/9781474215862Search in Google Scholar

[68] D. A. Mindell, Our Robots, Ourselves - Robotics and the Myths of Autonomy, Viking, New York, 2015Search in Google Scholar

[69] M. M. A. de Graaf, S. Ben Allouch, J. A. G. M. van Dijk, Long-term evaluation of a social robot in real homes, Interaction Studies, 2016, 17(3), 461-490, http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/is.17.3.08deg10.1075/is.17.3.08degSearch in Google Scholar

[70] A. van Wynsberghe, Healthcare robots - ethics, design and implementation, Ashgate, 201510.4324/9781315586397Search in Google Scholar