Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter April 9, 2020

Multi-objective optimization of injection-molded plastic parts using entropy weight, random forest, and genetic algorithm methods

  • Yanli Cao , Xiying Fan EMAIL logo , Yonghuan Guo , Sai Li and Haiyue Huang

Abstract

The qualities of injection-molded parts are affected by process parameters. Warpage and volume shrinkage are two typical defects. Moreover, insufficient or excessively large clamping force also affects the quality of parts and the cost of the process. An experiment based on the orthogonal design was conducted to minimize the above defects. Moldflow software was used to simulate the injection process of each experiment. The entropy weight was used to determine the weight of each index, the comprehensive evaluation value was calculated, and multi-objective optimization was transformed into single-objective optimization. A regression model was established by the random forest (RF) algorithm. To further illustrate the reliability and accuracy of the model, back-propagation neural network and kriging models were taken as comparative algorithms. The results showed that the error of RF was the smallest and its performance was the best. Finally, genetic algorithm was used to search for the minimum of the regression model established by RF. The optimal parameters were found to improve the quality of plastic parts and reduce the energy consumption. The plastic parts manufactured by the optimal process parameters showed good quality and met the requirements of production.

  1. Research funding: This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (funder id: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001809, grant 51475220) and the Xuzhou City Science and Technology Plan Projects (grant KC18239).

References

[1] Sun XJ, Zeng D, Tibbenham P, Su XM, Kang H. Polym. Test. 2019, 76, 320–325.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.03.024Search in Google Scholar

[2] Li Z, Liu L, Barenji AV, Wang WM. Procedia CIRP 2018, 72, 961–966.10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.004Search in Google Scholar

[3] Jamsheed M, Rahman MA, Moyeed MA, Ahmed GMS. Mater. Today Proc. 2015, 2, 2083–2093.10.1016/j.matpr.2015.07.203Search in Google Scholar

[4] Sun YF, Lee KS, Nee AYC. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2004, 24, 715–726.10.1007/s00170-003-1755-2Search in Google Scholar

[5] Singh G, Verma A. Mater. Today Proc 2017, 4, 1423–1433.10.1016/j.matpr.2017.01.164Search in Google Scholar

[6] Guo W, Hua L, Mao HJ, Meng ZH. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 2012, 26, 1133–1139.10.1007/s12206-012-0214-0Search in Google Scholar

[7] Bensingh RJ, Machavaram R, Boopathy SR, Jebarajc C. Measurement 2019, 134, 359–374.10.1016/j.measurement.2018.10.066Search in Google Scholar

[8] Ogorodnyk O, Lyngstad OV, Larsen M, Martinsen K. Procedia CIRP 2019, 81, 110–114.10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.020Search in Google Scholar

[9] Li K, Yan SL, Zhong YC, Pan WF, Zhao G. Simul. Modell. Pract. Theory 2019, 91, 69–82.10.1016/j.simpat.2018.09.003Search in Google Scholar

[10] Tan YZ, Ariff ZM, Khalil AM. Procedia Eng. 2017, 184, 350–359.10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.143Search in Google Scholar

[11] Schfer H, Pretschuh C, Brggemann O. Eur. Polym. J. 2019, 115, 6–11.10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.03.011Search in Google Scholar

[12] Gao YH, Wang XC. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2008, 37, 953–960.10.1007/s00170-007-1044-6Search in Google Scholar

[13] Shen CY, Wang LX, Li Q. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2007, 183, 412–418.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.10.036Search in Google Scholar

[14] Oliaei E, Heidari BS, Davachi SM. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2016, 32, 710–720.10.1016/j.jmst.2016.05.010Search in Google Scholar

[15] Altan M. Mater. Des. 2010, 31, 599–604.10.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.049Search in Google Scholar

[16] Hasan K, Babur O, Tuncay E. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2005, 169, 314–319.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.03.013Search in Google Scholar

[17] Hafezalkotob A, Hafezalkotob A. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2016, 31, 1211–1226.10.3233/IFS-162186Search in Google Scholar

[18] Farhad HL, Reza F. Entropy 2010, 12, 53–62.10.3390/e12010053Search in Google Scholar

[19] Maghsoodi AI, Abouhamzeh G, Khalilzadeh M, Zavadskas EK. Front. Bus. Res. China 2018, 12, 2.10.1186/s11782-017-0022-6Search in Google Scholar

[20] Leo B, Adele C. Mach. Learn. 2001, 45, 5–32.10.1023/A:1010933404324Search in Google Scholar

[21] Lahouar A, Slama JBH. Renew. Energy 2017, 109, 529–541.10.1016/j.renene.2017.03.064Search in Google Scholar

[22] Wei J. Plast. Manuf. 2007, 5, 142–143.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Chen JW, Yang L, Xu BP. Plast. Sci. Technol. 2014, 42, 62–66.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-10-23
Accepted: 2020-02-24
Published Online: 2020-04-09
Published in Print: 2020-04-28

©2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 30.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/polyeng-2019-0326/html
Scroll to top button