The role of inter- and intralingual factors and compendiums in acquisition of Swedish as a foreign language: the case of Finns learning definiteness and the use of articles

Eeva-Lisa Nyqvist

doi:10.1515/rela-2016-0016

Authors

Eeva-Lisa Nyqvist University of Helsinki

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1515/rela-2016-0016

Keywords:

Swedish, definiteness, use of articles, third language acquisition, Finnish

Abstract

This study explores the acquisition of definiteness and article use in written Swedish by Finnish-speaking teenagers (n=67) during the three years in secondary school. The studied grammatical phenomena are problematic for all L2 learners of Swedish and are especially difficult for learners, such as Finns, whose L1 lacks expressive definiteness morphologically.
The informants produce complex NPs already in their first narratives. The form of NPs poses significantly more problems than the choice of a correct form of definiteness. Hence, it is possible that previous knowledge in English helps informants in the choice of definiteness. The common nominator for problematic expressions is simplification, in both formal aspects and in the relation between form and meaning. Previous research in Sweden has made similar findings. The most central types of NPs build an acquisition explainable by a complexity hierarchy between the different types of NPs. The informants master best NPs without definiteness markers. Definite singulars containing an ending are significantly easier than indefinite singulars, the indefinite article of which is notoriously difficult for Finns learning Swedish as an L2. This acquisition order, however, profoundly differs from the traditional order of instruction of their compendiums.

References

Axelsson, M. 1994. NP development in Swedish as a second language. A study of adult learners acquiring definiteness and the semantics and morphology of adjectives. Stockholm: Stockholm University Centre for Research and Bilingualism.
Google Scholar

Basic Education Act 628/1998.
Google Scholar

Bohnacker, U. 1997. Determiner Phrases and the Debate on Functional Categories in Early Child Language. Language Acquisition 6(1). 49–90.
Google Scholar

Bohnacker, U. 2003. Nominal Phrases. In G. Hakansson, G. Josefsson and C. Platzack (eds), Acquisition of Swedish grammar, 195–259. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Cop.
Google Scholar

Brown, R. 1973. A First Language: The Early Stages. Cambridge: MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Cenoz, J. 2001. The Effect of Linguistic Distance, L2 Status and Age on Cross-linguistic Influence in Third Language Acquisition. In J. Cenoz (ed.), Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition, 8–20. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Google Scholar

Chrabaszcz, A. and N. Jiang. 2014. The role of the native language in the use of the English nongeneric definite article by L2 learners: A cross-linguistic comparison. Second language Research 30. 351–379.
Google Scholar

De Angelis, G. 2005. Interlanguage Transfer of Function Words. Language Learning 55. 379–414.
Google Scholar

DeKeyser, R. 2005. What Makes Learning Second Language Grammar Difficult? A Review of Issues. Language Learning 55. 1–25.
Google Scholar

Dulay, H. and M. Burt. 1973. Should we teach children syntax? Language Learning 23. 245–258.
Google Scholar

Dulay, H. and M. Burt. 1974. Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning 24. 37–53.
Google Scholar

Ellis, NC. 2002. Frequency effects in language processing: A Review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24. 143–188.
Google Scholar

Ellis, NC. 2003. Constructions, Chunking, and Connectionism: The Emergence of Second Language Structure. In C. J. Doughty and M. H. Long (eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, 63–103. Blackwell Publishing.
Google Scholar

Ellis, NC. 2005. At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27. 305–352.
Google Scholar

Ellis, R. 2008. The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Ellis, R. 2009: Investigating Learning Difficulty in Terms of Implicit and Explicit Knowledge. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, J. Philp, H. Reinder and R. Erlam (eds.), Implicit and Explicit Knowledge in Second Language Learning, Testing and Teaching, 143–166. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Google Scholar

Ellis, R. and G. Barkhuizen. 2005. Analysing Learner Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Eriksson, A. and E. Wijk-Andersson. 1988. Swedish Nouns and Articles in German and Polish Students’ Swedish Writing. FUMS Rapport 141: Uppsala universitet.
Google Scholar

FNBE 2004. = Finnish National Board of Education: Perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelman perusteet 2004. Available from: http://www.oph.fi/svenska/ops/grundskola/LPgrundl.pdf [Accessed:] 19th August 2015.
Google Scholar

FNBE 2014. = Finnish National Board of Education: Koulutuksen tilastollinen vuosikirja 2014. Helsinki: Finnish National Board of Education.
Google Scholar

Fraurud, K. 1988. Hierarchical Relations between Discourse Referents and the Interpretation of Antedecentless Definite Noun Phrases. In V. Rosen (ed.), Papers from the Tenth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, 196–210. Bergen: University of Bergen.
Google Scholar

General Upper Secondary Schools Act 629/1998.
Google Scholar

Glahn E., G. Hakansson, B. Hammarberg, A. Holmen, K. Lund and A. Hvenekilde. 2001. Processability in Scandinavian Second Language Acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23. 389–416.
Google Scholar

Goldschneider J. and R. DeKeyser. 2005. Explaining the “natural” order of L2 morpheme acquisition in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning 51. 1–50.
Google Scholar

Government Decree on University Degrees 794/2004.
Google Scholar

Hammarberg, B. 2007. Nyare utvecklingar inom forskningen om svenska som andrasprak.
Google Scholar

Nordand. Nordisk tidsskrift for andrespraksforskning 1/2007. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget. 43–61.
Google Scholar

Haspelmath, M. 1998. How young is Standard Average European? Language Sciences 20. 271–287.
Google Scholar

Heikkila, T-L. 2007. Engelskans inflytande i nominalfrasen i finsksprakiga kadetters svenska. An unpublished licentiate’s thesis. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
Google Scholar

Hellberg, S. 1987. Bestamd form: du vet vilken jag menar. In U. Teleman (ed.), Grammatik pĺ villovägar. Skrifter utgivna av Svenska sprĺknämnden 73, 33–38. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wicksell.
Google Scholar

Hyltenstam. K. 1988. Att tala svenska som en infodd – eller nastan. In K. Hyltenstam and I. Lindberg (eds.), Första symposiet om svenska som andrasprĺk. Volym 1: Föredrag om sprĺk, sprĺkinlärning och interaction, 138–156. Stockholm: Stockholm University.
Google Scholar

ISK = Hakulinen A, M. Vilkuna, R. Korhonen, V. Koivisto, TR. Heinonen and and I. Alho. 2004: Iso suomen kielioppi. Helsinki: Society of the Finnish Literature.
Google Scholar

Jarvis, S. and T. Odlin. 2000. Morphological type, spatial reference and language transfer. Studies in second Language Acquisition 22. 535–556.
Google Scholar

Juurakko, T. 1996. Prepositioner i finsksprakiga gymnasisters inlararsvenska. Jyvaskyla: University of Jyvaskyla.
Google Scholar

Juvonen, P. 2000. Om bestamdhetsmarkering i ett tvarsprakligt perspektiv – har finskan en bestamd artikel? In K. Fraurud, P. Juvonen and M. Sundman (eds.), Denna – den här – den där. Om demonstrativer i tvärsprĺklig belysning. En minnesskrift till Elsie Wijk-Andersson. ASLA Information 26(2). 57–92.
Google Scholar

Jarvinen, E-L. 2010: Val av species och bestamdhetsform i ett test for finska grundskoleelever. In C. Falk, A. Nord, A. and R. Palm (eds.), Svenskans beskrivning 30. Förhandlingar vid Trettionde sammankomsten för svenskans beskrivning, Stockholm den 10 och 11 oktober 2008, 154–163. Stockholm: Institutionen for nordiska sprak, Stockholm University.
Google Scholar

Karlsson, F. 2008. Finnish: An Essential Grammar. London: Routledge. 2nd edition.
Google Scholar

Karppinen, M. and R. Sarkkinen. 1995. Ruotsin kielen oppimistuloksia peruskoulun 9. luokan valtakunnallisessa kokeessa. Helsinki: Finnish National Board of Education: 23/1995.
Google Scholar

Kellerman, E 1977. Towards a characterization of the strategy of transfer in second language learning. Interlanguage studies Bulletin, Utrecht 2. 58–145.
Google Scholar

Lahtinen, S. 1993a. Om nominalfrasens struktur i finska gymnasisters inlararsvenska och deras beharskning av typerna” den gula bilen” och ”en gul bil”. In A. Golden and A. Hvenekilde (eds.), Rapport fra det andre forskersymposiet om Nordens sprĺk som andrasprĺk, 181–190. Oslo: Oslo universitet, avdelning for norsk som andresprak. Institutt for lingvistiske fag.
Google Scholar

Lahtinen. S. 1993b. Om nominalfrasens struktur och feltyperna en (gul) bilen och det gula bilen i finska gymnasisters inlararsvenska. In V. Muittari and M. Rahkonen (eds.), Svenskan i Finland 2, 85–98. Jyvaskyla: University of Jyvaskyla.
Google Scholar

Lahtinen, S. 1998. Genuskongruens och genus i finska gymnasisters inlärarsvenska. Jyvaskyla: Jyvaskyla universitet.
Google Scholar

Laury, R. 1996. Sen kategoriasta – onko suomessa jo artikkeli? Virittaja 2. 162–180.
Google Scholar

Levelt, WJM. 1989. Speaking. From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Google Scholar

Lyons, C. 1999. Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Nordanger, M. 2009. Keiserens nye klar? Lingvistisk og konseptuell transfer i markeringen av grammatikalisert definitt referanse i russiskspraklige og engelsksprakliges norske mellomsprak – en studie basert pa ASK. Bergen: University of Bergen.
Google Scholar

Nyqvist, E-L. 2013. Species och artikelbruk i finsksprĺkiga grundskoleelevers inlärarsvenska. En longitudinell undersökning i ĺrskurserna 7–9. University of Turku.
Google Scholar

Nyqvist, E-L. 2014. Hurdana species- och artikelfel bor motarbetas? In J. Lindstrom, S. Henricson, A. Huhtala, P. Kukkonen, H. Lehti-Eklund and C. Lindholm, C (eds.), Svenskans Beskrivning 33. Nordica Helsingiensia 37. 353–362.
Google Scholar

Nyqvist, E-L. 2015. Species och artikelbruk hos vuxna svenskinlarare. NordAnd 2/2015. 75–101.
Google Scholar

Odlin, T. 2003. Transfer. In C. J. Doughty and M. H. Long (eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, 436–486. Blackwell Publishing.
Google Scholar

Pettersson, T. 1976. Bestamda och obestamda former. In E. Garding (ed.), Kontrastiv fonetik och syntax med svenska i centrum, 119–142. Lund: Liber Laromedel.
Google Scholar

Philipsson, A. 2004. Svenskans morfologi och syntax i ett andraspraksperspektiv. In K. Hyltenstam and I. Lindberg (eds.), Svenska som andrasprĺk – i forskning, undervisning och samhälle, 117–151. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Google Scholar

Pienemann, M. 1998. Language Processing and Second Language Development: Processability theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Google Scholar

Pienemann, M. and G. Hakansson. 1999. A unified approach towards the development of Swedish as L2: a processability account. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21. 383–420.
Google Scholar

Ringbom, H. 1992. On L1 Transfer in L2 Comprehension and L2 Production. Language Learning 42. 85–112.
Google Scholar

Ringbom, H. 2007a. Cross-linguistic similarity in Foreign Language Learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Google Scholar

Ringbom, H. 2007b. Actual, perceived and assumed cross-linguistic similarities in foreign language learning. In O-P. Salo, T. Nikula and P. Kalaja (eds.), Kieli oppimisessa – Language in Learning. AFinLa’s Yearbook 2007, 183–196. Jyvaskyla: Jyvaskyla University Press.
Google Scholar

SAG 2 = Telemann, U., S. Hellberg and E. Andersson. 1999. Svenska Akademis Grammatik. Del 2: Ord. Stockholm: Nordstedts Ordbok.
Google Scholar

SAG 3 = Telemann, U., S. Hellberg and E. Andersson. 1999. Svenska Akademis Grammatik. Del 3: Fraser. Stockholm: Nordstedts Ordbok.
Google Scholar

Sundman, M. 1995. Species och artikelbruk hos avancerade inlarare av svenska. In M. Kalin and S. Latomaa (eds.), Nordens sprĺk som andrasprĺk 3, 220–229. Jyvaskyla: Language Centre for Finnish Universities.
Google Scholar

Statistics Finland 2014. Available from: http://www.stat.fi/til/vaerak/2013/vaerak_2013_2014-03-21_tau_001_en.html [Accessed:] 31st of August 2015.
Google Scholar

Tuokko, E. 2002. Perusopetuksen paattovaiheen ruotsin kielen oppimistulosten kansallinen arviointi 2001. Oppimistulosten arviointi 3/2002. Helsinki: Finnish National Board of Education.
Google Scholar

Tuokko, E. 2009. Miten ruotsia osataan peruskoulussa? Perusopetuksen paattovaiheen ruotsin kielen B-oppimaaran oppimistulosten kansallinen arviointi 2008. Helsinki: Finnish National Board of Education.
Google Scholar

Wijk-Andersson, E. 1994. Bestamdhetsmarkering och bestamdhetsgivning. In A. Holmberg and K. Larsson (eds.), Svenskans beskrivning 20, 380–387. Lund: Lund University Press.
Google Scholar

Vilkuna, M. 1992. Referenssi ja määräisyys suomenkielisten tekstien tulkinnassa. Helsinki: Society of the Finnish Literature.
Google Scholar