Abstract
This paper offers a reconstruction of Xenocrates’ theory of indivisibles which would not commit him to the idea of ‘jerky motion’ criticized by Aristotle in Physica VI, yet would perfectly square with Plato’s Timaeus, the basis of Xenocrates’ canon. Relying on Alexander’s, Porphyry’s, and Themistius’s accounts of his theory, as well on a detailed analysis of De lineis insecabilibus, I suggest that Xenocrates’ minima, contrary to what Aristotle implies, are not to be understood as more or less stable particulars, like tiny chunks of matter, moving about or leaping in physical space from point A to point B. Yet Xenocrates’ minima do remain ‘physical’ and ‘corporeal’ in a more Platonic sense of these words, not presupposing any kind of leaping, jumping, or jerking. This explains why Xenocrates associated the sensible realm with one of the three Fates, namely Clotho.
Funder Name: National Research University Higher School of Economics
Funder Id: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100007251
Grant Number: HSE Academic Fund Programme, 20-01-029
Algra, K. 1994. Concepts of Space in Greek Thought. Leiden.10.1163/9789004320871Search in Google Scholar
Baltes, M. 1976. Die Weltentstehung des platonischen Timaios nach den antiken Interpreten. Teil 1. Leiden.10.1163/9789004320512_002Search in Google Scholar
–. 1988. “Zur Theologie des Xenokrates”. In Knowledge of God in the Graeco-Roman World. Ed. R. B. van den Broek/T. Baarda/J. Mansfeld. Leiden, 43–68.Search in Google Scholar
Barker, A. 2009. “Heraclides and Musical History”. In Heraclides of Pontus: Discussion. Ed. W. W. Fortenbaugh/E. Pender. New Brunswick, 273–98.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2015. Porphyry’s Commentary on Ptolemy’s Harmonics: A Greek Text and Annotated Translation. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
–. (ed.) 1989. Greek Musical Writings. Vol. II: Harmonic and Acoustic Theory. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (ed.) 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle. The Revised Oxford Translation. Vol. 2. Princeton.10.1515/9781400835850Search in Google Scholar
Bett, R. (trans.) 2005. Sextus Empiricus: Against the Logicians. New York.10.1017/CBO9780511815232Search in Google Scholar
–. (trans.) 2012. Sextus Empiricus: Against the Physicists. New York.Search in Google Scholar
Brisson, L. 1998. Le Même et l’Autre dans la structure ontologique du Timée de Platon. St. Augustin.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2000. Lectures de Platon. Paris.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2000a. “Le rôle des mathématiques dans le Timée selon les interprétations contemporaines”. In Le Timée de Platon: contributions à l’histoire de sa réception. Ed. A. Neschke-Hentschke. Louvain, 295–315.Search in Google Scholar
Carter, J. W. 2019. Aristotle on Earlier Greek Psychology: The Science of Soul. Cambridge.10.1017/9781108646321Search in Google Scholar
Cherniss, H. 1944. Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato and the Academy. Baltimore.Search in Google Scholar
–. l954. “A Much Misread Passage of the Timaeus (Timaeus 49C7–50B5)”. The American Journal of Philology 75.2, 113–30.10.2307/292030Search in Google Scholar
–. 1959. “Review: Le Περὶ Φιλοσοφίας d’Aristote et la théorie platonicienne des idées et des nombres by H. D. Saffrey”. Gnomon 31.1, 36–51.Search in Google Scholar
Coope, U. 2005. Time for Aristotle: Physics IV. 10–14. Oxford.10.1093/0199247900.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Crivelli, P. 2020. “Division and Classification: Philebus 14c–20a”. In Plato’s Philebus: A Philosophical Discussion. Ed. P. Dimas/R. E. Jones/G. R. Lear. Oxford, 34–54.10.1093/oso/9780198803386.003.0003Search in Google Scholar
Diels H. (ed.) 1882–95. Simplicius. In Aristotelis physicorum libros commentaria, 2 vols. Berlin.10.1515/9783110805017Search in Google Scholar
Dillon, J. 1985. “Xenocrates’ Metaphysics: Fr. 15 (Heinze) Re-Examined”. Ancient Philosophy 5, 47–52.10.5840/ancientphil19855126Search in Google Scholar
–. 2003. The Heirs of Plato: A Study of the Old Academy, 347–274 B.C. Oxford; New York.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2003a. “The Timaeus in the Old Academy”. In Plato’s Timaeus as Cultural Icon. Ed. G. J. Reydams-Schils. Notre Dame, 80–94.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2004. “Atomism in the Old Academy”. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 19, 1–17.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2007. “Review: Die Philosophie des Xenokrates im Kontext der alten Akademie by D. Thiel”. The Journal of Hellenic Studies 127, 240–41.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2019. “Xenocrates on Plato, Pythagoras and the Poets”. Méthexis 31, 67–81.10.1163/24680974-03101004Search in Google Scholar
Dillon, J./D. O’Meara, tr. 2006. Syrianus. On Aristotle Metaphysics 13–14. London.Search in Google Scholar
Dörrie, H. 1967. “Xenokrates”. In Paulys Realencyclopaedie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, vol. IX A.2. Stuttgart, 1512–28.Search in Google Scholar
Drozdek, A. 2007. Greek Philosophers as Theologians: The Divine Arche. Aldershot.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2003. Xenocrates, Fr. 15. Minerva. Revista de Filología Clásica 16, 45–51.Search in Google Scholar
Düring, I. 1968. Aristoteles. In: Paulys Realenzyklopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaften, supp. XI. Stuttgart,159–336.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1934. Ptolemaios und Porphyrios über die Musik. Hildesheim (repr. 1987).Search in Google Scholar
Federspiel, M. (trans.) 2017. Pseudo-Aristote. Des couleurs. Des sons. Du souffle. Paris.Search in Google Scholar
Forcignanò, F. 2017. Forme, linguaggio, sostanze: il dibattito sulle idee nell’Accademia antica. Milano.Search in Google Scholar
Furley, D. J. 1967. Two Studies in the Greek Atomists. Study I: Indivisible Magnitudes. Princeton.10.1515/9781400879458Search in Google Scholar
Gaiser, K. 1962. Platons ungeschriebene Lehre: Studien zur systematischen und geschichtlichen Begründung der wissenschaften in der platonischen Schule. Stuttgart.Search in Google Scholar
Gerson, L. Ph. 2013. From Plato to Platonism. Ithaca.10.7591/cornell/9780801452413.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Gottschalk, H. B. 1968. “The De Audibilibus and Peripatetic Acoustics”. Hermes 96(3), 435–60.Search in Google Scholar
Gutas, D. (ed.) 2010. Theophrastus On First Principles (known as his Metaphysics): Greek Text and Medieval Arabic Translation. Leiden.Search in Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. Ch. 1978. A History of Greek Philosophy, vol. V. London.10.1017/CBO9780511518430Search in Google Scholar
Heinze, R. 1892. Xenokrates: Darstellung der Lehre und Sammlung der Fragmente. Leipzig.Search in Google Scholar
Hett, W. S. (trans.) 1936. Aristotle. Minor Works. Cambridge, MA.Search in Google Scholar
Huby, P./Taylor, C. C. W. (trans.) 2011. Simplicius. On Aristotle Physics 1.3–4, London.Search in Google Scholar
Isnardi Parente, M. 1981. “Le peri ideôn d’Aristote: Platon ou Xénocrate?” Phronesis 26.2, 135–52.10.1163/156852881X00213Search in Google Scholar
–. 1982. “Un fragment de Xénocrate et le problème de la connaissance sensible”. Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger 172(2), 293–305.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1996. “Les témoignages sur Speusippe et Xénocrate dans le premier livre du De Anima”. In Corps et âme: sur le De anima d’Aristote. Ed. G. R. Dherbey/C. Viano. Paris, 107–23.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2008. “Senocrate in Sesto Empirico”. Rivista di Storia della Filosofia 63.3, 477–83.Search in Google Scholar
–. (ed.) 2012. Senocrate e Ermodoro: Testimonianze e frammenti. Edizione rivista e aggiornata a cura di Tiziano Dorandi. Pisa.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2018. “Xénocrate de Chalcédoine”. In Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, vol. 7. Ed. R. Goulet. Paris, 194–208.Search in Google Scholar
Kenney, J. P. 2010. Mystical Monotheism: A Study in Ancient Platonic Theology. Eugene.Search in Google Scholar
Krämer, H. J. 1964. Der Ursprung der Geistmetaphysik: Untersuchungen zur Geschichte des Platonismus zwischen Platon und Plotin. Amsterdam.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1971. Platonismus und hellenistische Philosophie. Berlin (repr. 2012).Search in Google Scholar
Lederman, H. 2014. “Ho pote on esti and Coupled Entities: A Form of Explanation in Aristotle’s Natural Philosophy”. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 46, 109–64.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198712923.003.0004Search in Google Scholar
Lee, E. N. 1966. “On the Metaphysics of the Image in Plato’s Timaeus”. The Monist 50(3), 341–68.10.5840/monist196650326Search in Google Scholar
Muniz, F./Rudebusch, G. 2004. “Plato, Philebus 15b: A Problem Solved”. The Classical Quarterly 54(2), 394–405.10.1093/clquaj/bmh047Search in Google Scholar
Nicol, A.T. 1936. “Indivisible Lines”. The Classical Quarterly 30. 2, 120–26.10.1017/S0009838800012957Search in Google Scholar
Pines, Sh. 1961. “A New Fragment of Xenocrates and Its Implications”. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 51(2), 3–34.10.2307/1005801Search in Google Scholar
Raffa, M. 2016. Claudio Tolemeo, Armonica. Con il Commentario di Porfirio. Milan.Search in Google Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C. (trans.) 2016. Aristotle: Metaphysics. Indianapolis.Search in Google Scholar
–. (trans.) 2018. Aristotle: Physics. Indianapolis.Search in Google Scholar
Roark, T. 2011. Aristotle on Time: A Study of the Physics. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511753664Search in Google Scholar
Ross, W. D. 1923–24. Aristotle’s Metaphysics. A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary, 2 vols. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1936. Aristotle’s Physics: A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
Sachs, E. 1917. Die fünf platonischen Körper. Berlin.Search in Google Scholar
Sattler, B. 2020. The Concept of Motion in Ancient Greek Thought: Foundations in Logic, Method, and Mathematics. Cambridge.10.1017/9781108775199Search in Google Scholar
Schütrumpf, E. (ed.)/Stork, P./van Ophujsen, J./Prince, S. (trans.) 2017. Heraclides of Pontus: Texts and Translations. London.10.4324/9780203790151Search in Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 1976. “Epicurus and His Professional Rivals”. In Études sur l’épicurisme antique. Ed. J. Bollack/Laks, A. Lille, 119–59.10.4000/books.septentrion.118335Search in Google Scholar
–. 2002. “The Origins of Stoic God”. In Traditions of Theology: Studies in Hellenistic Theology, Its Background and Aftermath. Ed. D. Frede/A. Laks. Leiden, 41–83.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2003. Plato’s Cratylus. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2021. “Xenocrates’ Invention of Platonism”. In Authority and Authoritative Texts in the Platonist Tradition. Ed. M. Erler/J. E. Heßler/F. Petrucci. Oxford, 12–37.Search in Google Scholar
Silverman, A. 2002. The Dialectic of Essence. Princeton.10.1515/9781400825349Search in Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. 1983. Time, Creation, and the Continuum: Theories in Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages. London.Search in Google Scholar
Strang, C./Mills, K. W. 1974. “Plato and the Instant”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 48, 63–96.10.1093/aristoteliansupp/48.1.63Search in Google Scholar
Thiel, D. 2006. Die Philosophie des Xenokrates im Kontext der Alten Akademie. München.10.1515/9783110921182Search in Google Scholar
Timpanaro Cardini, M. (ed.) 1970. Pseudo-Aristotele: De lineis insecabilibus. Milano.Search in Google Scholar
Todd, R. B. (ed.) 2013. Themistius: On Aristotle On the Soul. London.Search in Google Scholar
Van Riel, G. 2021. “Matter Doesn’t Matter: On the Status of Bodies in the Timaeus (30a–32b and 53c–61c)”. In Plato’s Timaeus: Proceedings of the Tenth Symposium Platonicum Pragense. Ed. Ch. Jorgenson/F. Karfík/Š. Špinka. Leiden, 169–86.10.1163/9789004437081_010Search in Google Scholar
Verde, F. 2013. Elachista. La dottrina dei minimi nell’epicureismo. Leuven.10.2307/j.ctt9qdznpSearch in Google Scholar
Wehrli, F. 1969. Die Schule des Aristoteles: Texte und Kommentar. Heft 7 : Herakleides Pontikos. Basel.Search in Google Scholar
Zeller, E./Mondolfo, R. 1974. La filosofia dei greci nel suo sviluppo storico. Parte II, volume III/2, a cura di Margherita Isnardi Parente. Firenze.Search in Google Scholar
Zeller, E. 1875. Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung. Theil 2, Abth. 1. 3. Aufl. Leipzig.Search in Google Scholar
Zeyl, D. J., (trans.) 2000. Plato: Timaeus. Indianapolis.Search in Google Scholar
Zhmud, L. 2012. Pythagoras and the Early Pythagoreans. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199289318.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
