Abstract
Background:
Variation in metabolism, toxicity and therapeutic efficacy of thiopurine drugs is largely influenced by genetic polymorphisms in the thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) gene. Determination of TPMT activity is routinely performed in patients to adjust drug therapy.
Methods:
We further optimized a previously established high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method by measuring TPMT activity in whole blood instead of isolated erythrocytes, which is based on conversion of 6-mercaptopurine to 6-methylmercaptopurine using S-adenosyl-methionine as methyl donor.
Results:
The simplified TPMT whole-blood method showed similar or better analytical and diagnostic performance compared with the former erythrocyte assay. The whole-blood method was linear for TPMT activities between 0 and 40 nmol/(mL·h) with a quantification limit of 0.1 nmol/(mL·h). Within-day imprecision and between-day imprecision were ≤5.1% and ≤8.5%, respectively. The optimized method determining TPMT activity in whole blood (y) showed agreement with the former method determining TPMT activity in erythrocytes (x) (n=45, y=1.218+0.882x; p>0.05). Phenotype-genotype concordance (n=300) of the whole-blood method was better when TPMT activity was expressed per volume of whole blood (specificity 92.2%), whereas correction for hematocrit resulted in lower genotype concordance (specificity 86.9%). A new cutoff for the whole-blood method to distinguish normal from reduced TPMT activity was determined at ≤6.7 nmol/(mL·h).
Conclusions:
This optimized TPMT phenotyping assay from whole blood using 6-MP as substrate is suitable for research and routine clinical analysis.
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge Andrea Jarmuth for excellent technical assistance.
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of the submitted manuscript and approved submission. HPLC data are part of the bachelor thesis from Patrik Schmidt written in 2016 at the Reutlingen University, Germany.
Research funding: The work was supported by the Robert Bosch Foundation (Stuttgart, Germany) and European Commission Horizon 2020 UPGx grant 668353.
Employment or leadership: None declared.
Honorarium: None declared.
Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.
References
1. Aarbakke J, Janka-Schaub G, Elion GB. Thiopurine biology and pharmacology. Trends in Pharmacol Sci 1997;18:3–7.10.1016/S0165-6147(96)01007-3Search in Google Scholar
2. Tamm R, Mägi, Tremmel R, Winter S, Mihailov E, Smid A, et al. Polymorphic variation in TPMT is the principal determinant of TPMT phenotype: a meta-analysis of three genome-wide association studies. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2017;101:684–95.10.1002/cpt.540Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
3. Appell M, Berg M, Duley J, Evans WE, Kennedy MA, Lennard L, et al. Nomenclature for alleles of the thiopurine methyltransferase gene. Pharmagogenet Genomics 2013;23:242–8.10.1097/FPC.0b013e32835f1cc0Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
4. Weinshilboum RM, Sladek SL. Mercaptopurine pharmacogenetics: monogenic inheritance of erythrocyte thiopurine methyltransferase activity. Am J Hum Genet 1980;32:651–62.Search in Google Scholar
5. Lennard L. Implementation of TPMT testing. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2013;77:704–14.10.1111/bcp.12226Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
6. Ansari A, Hassan C, Duley J, Marinaki E, Shobowale-Bakre M, Seed P, et al. Thiopurine methyltransferase activity and the use of azathioprine in inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2002;16:1743–50.10.1046/j.1365-2036.2002.01353.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
7. Schaeffeler E, Fischer C, Brockmeier D, Wernet D, Moerike K, Eichelbaum M, et al. Comprehensive analysis of thiopurine S-methyltransferase phenotype-genotype correlation in a large population of German-Caucasians and identification of novel TPMT variants. Pharmacogenetics 2004;14:407–17.10.1097/01.fpc.0000114745.08559.dbSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
8. Chouchana L, Celine Narjoz D, Roche JL, Golmard JL, Pineau B, Chatellier G, et al. Interindividual variability in TPMT enzyme activity: 10 years of experience with thiopurine pharmacogenetics and therapeutic drug monitoring. Pharmacogenomic 2014;15:745–57.10.2217/pgs.14.32Search in Google Scholar PubMed
9. Kaskas BA, Louis E, Hindorf U, Schaeffeler E, Deflandre J, Graepler F, et al. Safe treatment of thiopurine S-methyltransferase deficient Crohn’s disease patients with azathioprine. Gut 2003;52:140–2.10.1136/gut.52.1.140Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
10. Lennard L. Clinical implementation of thiopurine methyltransferase – optimization of drug dosage and potential drug interactions. Ther Drug Monit 1998;20:527–31.10.1097/00007691-199810000-00014Search in Google Scholar PubMed
11. Indjova D, Shipkova M, Atananasova S, Niedmann PD, Armstrong VW, Svinarov D, et al. Determination of thiopurine methyltransferase phenotype in isolated human erythrocytes using a new simple nonradioactive HPLC method. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring 2003;25:637–44.10.1097/00007691-200310000-00014Search in Google Scholar PubMed
12. Ford L, Graham V, Berg J. Whole-blood thiopurine S-methyltransferase activity with genotype concordance: a new, simplified phenotyping assay. Ann Clin Biochem 2006;43:354–60.10.1258/000456306778520070Search in Google Scholar PubMed
13. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Protocols for Determination of Limits of Detection and Limits of Quantification, Approved Guideline. CLSI document EP17. Wayne, PA (USA), 2004.Search in Google Scholar
14. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on Bioanalytical Method Validation. Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, European Medicines Agency. London (UK), 2012.Search in Google Scholar
15. Food and Drug Administration. Draft guidance for Industry: Bioanalytical Method Validation. US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Rockville, MD (USA), 2013.Search in Google Scholar
16. Schaeffeler E, Zanger UM, Eichelbaum M, Asante-Poku S, Shin J-G, Schwab M. Highly multiplexed genotyping of thiopurine s-methyltransferase variants using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry: reliable genotyping in different ethnic groups. Clin Chem 2008;54:1637–47.10.1373/clinchem.2008.103457Search in Google Scholar PubMed
17. Barlow NL, Graham V, Berg JD. Expressing thiopurine S-methyltransferase activity as units per litre of whole-blood overcomes misleading high results in patients with anaemia. Ann Clin Biochem 2010;47:408–14.10.1258/acb.2010.010058Search in Google Scholar PubMed
18. Shipkova M, Niedmann PD, Armstrong VW, Oellerich M, Wieland E. Determination of thiopurine methyltransferase activity in isolated human erythrocytes does not reflect putative in vivo enzyme inhibition by sulfasalazine. Clin Chem 2004;50:438–41.10.1373/clinchem.2003.026096Search in Google Scholar PubMed
19. Wennerstrand P, Mårtensson LG, Söderhäll S, Zimdahl A, Appell ML. Methotrexate binds to recombinant thiopurine S-metyhltransferase and inhibits enzyme activity after high-dose infusions in childhood leukaemia. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2013;69:1641–9.10.1007/s00228-013-1521-9Search in Google Scholar PubMed
20. Xin HW, Fischer C, Schwab M, Klotz U. Thiopurine S-methyltransferase as a target for drug interactions. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2005;61:395–8.10.1007/s00228-005-0950-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed
21. Kasirer Y, Mevorach R, Renbaum P, Algur N, Soiferman D, Beeri R, et al. Thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) activity is better determined by biochemical assay versus genotyping in the Jewish population. Dig Dis Sci 2014;59:1207–12.10.1007/s10620-013-3008-zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
22. Dervieux T, Blanco JG, Krynetski EY, Vanin EF, Roussel MF, Relling MV. Differing contribution of thiopurine methyltransferase to mercaptopurine versus thioguanine effects in human leukemic cells. Cancer Res 2001;61:5810–6.Search in Google Scholar
23. Hartford C, Vasquez E, Schwab M, Edick MJ, Rehg JE, Grosveld G, et al. Differential effects of targeted disruption of thiopurine methyltransferase on mercaptopurine and thioguanine pharmacodynamics. Cancer Res 2007;67:4965–72.10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3508Search in Google Scholar PubMed
©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
