Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter February 8, 2017

Restoration Constitution-Making

  • William Partlett

    Senior Lecturer at Melbourne Law School

    EMAIL logo
From the journal ICL Journal

Abstract

This Article will examine an important - but largely ignored - approach to constitution- making: The use of restored constitutional orders as the basis for the creation of a new constitutional order. Looking at this ‘restoration constitution-making’ in post-communist constitutional transition, it will describe how restoration held both advantages and disadvantages. On one hand, restoration improved the politics of constitution-making by helping to avoid the elite manipulation of extraordinary institutions during constitutional drafting. On the other hand, the restoration of decades-old constitutions also led to restored laws that privileged past generations and undermined broad popular participation. Finally, restoration was an important part of gaining international recognition for independence. This international component suggests that constitution-making is about more than just domestic politics. These findings are an important first step in understanding the potential of restoration to ensure a successful constitutional transition.

About the author

William Partlett

Senior Lecturer at Melbourne Law School

Published Online: 2017-2-8
Published in Print: 2015-12-1

© 2017 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 26.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/icl-2015-0404/html
Scroll to top button