Abstract
Principles of morphotactics are a major source of morphological diversity amongst the world’s languages, and it is well-known that languages exhibit many different types of deviation from a canonical ideal in which there is a unique and consistent mapping between function and form. In this paper we present data from Murrinhpatha (non-Pama-Nyungan, northern Australia) that demonstrates a type of non-canonical morphotactics so far unattested in the literature, one which we call positional dependency. This type is unusual in that the non-canonical pattern is driven by morphological form rather than by morphosyntactic function. In this case the realisation of one morph is dependent on the position in the verbal template of another morph. Thus, it is the linearisation of morphs that conditions the morphological realisation, not the morphosyntactic feature set. Positional dependency in Murrinhpatha thus expands our typology of content-form interactions and non-canonical morphotactics with implications for our understanding of morphological structure cross-linguistically.
Funding source: Australian Research Council
Award Identifier / Grant number: DE180100872
Award Identifier / Grant number: CE140100041
References
Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Baerman, Matthew, Dunstan Brown & Greville G. Corbett. 2017. Morphological complexity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316343074Search in Google Scholar
Blythe, Joe, Rachel Nordlinger & Nicholas Reid. 2007. Murrinh Patha finite verb paradigms. Wadeye N.T: Unpublished MS.Search in Google Scholar
Blythe, Joseph. 2009. Doing referring in Murrinh-Patha conversation. Sydney: University of Sydney PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Bonami, Olivier & Gilles Boyé. 2008. Paradigm shape is morphomic in Nepali. In Paper presented at the 13th International Morphology Meeting. Vienna.Search in Google Scholar
Brown, Dunstan, Marina Chumakina & Greville G. Corbett (eds.). 2012. Canonical morphology and syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199604326.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 2009. Canonical Inflectional Classes. In Fabio Montermini, Gilles Boyé & Jesse Tseng (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 6th Décembrettes, 1–11. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Search in Google Scholar
Crysmann, Berthold. 2020. Morphotactic dependencies in Yimas. Lingue e Linguaggio XIX(1). 91–130.Search in Google Scholar
Crysmann, Berthold & Olivier Bonami. 2016. Variable morphotactics in Information-based Morphology. Journal of Linguistics 52(2). 311–374. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226715000018.Search in Google Scholar
Diaz, Thomas S., Jean-Pierre Koenig & Karin Michelson. 2019. Oneida prepronominal prefixes in Information-based Morphology. Morphology 29(4). 431–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-019-09345-2.Search in Google Scholar
Foley, William A. 1991. The Yimas language of New Guinea. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Luís, Ana & Ricardo Bermúdez-Otero (eds.). 2016. The morphome debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198702108.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Mansfield, John. 2014. Polysynthetic sociolinguistics: The language and culture of Murrinh Patha Youth. Canberra: Australian National University PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Mansfield, John. 2015. Morphotactic variation, prosodic domains and the changing structure of the Murrinhpatha verb. Asia-Pacific Language Variation 1(2). 162–188. https://doi.org/10.1075/aplv.1.2.03man.Search in Google Scholar
Mansfield, John. 2016. Intersecting formatives and inflectional predictability: How do speakers and learners predict the correct form of Murrinhpatha verbs?”. Word Structure 9(2). 183–214. https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2016.0093.Search in Google Scholar
Mansfield, John. 2019a. Murrinhpatha morphology and phonology. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781501503306Search in Google Scholar
Mansfield, John. 2019b. Epistemic authority and sociolinguistic stance in an Australian Aboriginal Language. Open Linguistics 5(1). 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2019-0002.Search in Google Scholar
Mansfield, John, Joe Blythe, Rachel Nordlinger & Chester Street. 2019. Murrinhpatha Morpho-Corpus. Melbourne, Australia: Digital Corpus, Melbourne University.10.1515/9781501503306Search in Google Scholar
Mansfield, John & Rachel Nordlinger. 2020. Demorphologization and deepening complexity in Murrinhpatha. In Arkadiev Peter & Francesco Gardani (eds.), The complexities of morphology, 52–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198861287.003.0003Search in Google Scholar
Mansfield, John, Sabine Stoll & Balthasar Bickel. 2020. Category clustering: A probabalistic bias in the morphology of verbal agreement marking. Language 96(2). 255–293. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2020.0021.Search in Google Scholar
Nordlinger, Rachel. 2009. Murrinh-Patha agreement: Implications for the relationship between theory and description. In Peter Austin, Oliver Bond, Monik Charette, David Nathan & Sells Peter (eds.), Proceedings of conference on language documentation & linguistic theory 2, 251–261. London, UK: SOAS.Search in Google Scholar
Nordlinger, Rachel. 2010. Verbal morphology in Murrinh-Patha: Evidence for templates. Morphology 20(2). 321–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-010-9184-z.Search in Google Scholar
Nordlinger, Rachel. 2015. Inflection in Murrinhpatha. In Matthew Baerman (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Inflection, 491–519. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591428.013.21Search in Google Scholar
Nordlinger, Rachel & John Mansfield. 2015. Murrinhpatha verbs and models of morphology. Paper presented at the Australian Linguistics Society 2015. Sydney, Australia: Western Sydney University.Search in Google Scholar
Nordlinger, Rachel & Patrick Caudal. 2012. The tense, aspect and modality system in Murrinh-Patha. Australian Journal of Linguistics 32(1). 73–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2012.657754.Search in Google Scholar
Round, Erich. 2015. Rhizomorphomes, meromorphomes and metamorphomes. In Matthew Baerman, Dunstan Brown & Greville Corbett (eds.), Understanding and measuring morphological complexity, 29–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198723769.003.0003Search in Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew. 2004. Morphology – An overview of central concepts. In Louisa Sadler & Andrew Spencer (eds.), Projecting morphology, 67–110. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Street, Chester. 1987. An introduction to the language and culture of the Murrinh-Patha. Australian Aborigines Branch Darwin, Northern Territory: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory. 2016. Inflectional paradigms: Content and form at the syntax-morphology interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316105290Search in Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory. 2017a. The nature and dimensions of complexity in morphology. Annual Review of Linguistics 3(1). 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011415-040752.Search in Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory. 2017b. Morphotactics course. Course notes from Linguistics Society of America 2017 Summer Institute, ms. Lexington, KY, USA: University of Kentucky.Search in Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory. 2019. An apparently noncanonical pattern of morphotactic competition. In Franz Rainer, Francesco Gardani, Wolfgang U. Dressler & Hans Christian Luschützky (eds.), Competition in inflection and word-formation, 259–278. Switzerland: Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-02550-2_10Search in Google Scholar
Terrill, Angela. 2003. A grammar of Lavukaleve. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110923964Search in Google Scholar
Walsh, Michael. 1976. The Murinypata language of North West Australia. PhD dissertation. Canberra: Australian National University.Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
