Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter February 17, 2022

Comments on the Review of the scientific evidence on the individual sensitivity to electromagnetic fields (EHS) by Dariusz Leszczynski

  • Maël Dieudonné EMAIL logo

Corresponding author: Maël Dieudonné, PhD, Department of Public Health, University Hospital of Lyon, Lyon, France, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

References

1. Leszczynski, D. Review of the scientific evidence on the individual sensitivity to electromagnetic fields (EHS). Rev Environ Health 2022;37:423–50. https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2021-0038.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Dieudonné, M. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: a critical review of explanatory hypotheses. Environ Health 2020;19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-020-00602-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Belpomme, D, Campagnac, C, Irigaray, P. Reliable disease biomarkers characterizing and identifying electrohypersensitivity and multiple chemical sensitivity as two etiopathogenic aspects of a unique pathological disorder. Rev Environ Health 2015;30:251–71. https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2015-0027.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Irigaray, P, Caccamo, D, Belpomme, D. Oxidative stress in electrohypersensitivity self-reporting patients: results of a prospective in vivo investigation with comprehensive molecular analysis. Int J Mol Med 2018;42:1885–98. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2018.3774.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Dieudonné, M. Does electromagnetic hypersensitivity originate from nocebo responses? Indications from a qualitative study. Bioelectromagnetics 2016;37:14–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.21937.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Dieudonné, M. Becoming electro‐hypersensitive: a replication study. Bioelectromagnetics 2019;40:188–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.22180.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Eltiti, S, Wallace, D, Zougkou, K, Russo, R, Joseph, S, Rasor, P, et al.. Development and evaluation of the electromagnetic hypersensitivity questionnaire. Bioelectromagnetics 2007;28:137–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20279.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Schooneveld, H, Kuiper, J. Electrohypersensitivity (EHS) in the Netherlands. A questionnaire survey. Netherlands: Dutch Electrohypersensitivity (EHS) Foundation; 2008.Search in Google Scholar

9. Graveling, RA, Pilkington, A, George, JP, Butler, MP, Tannahill, SN. A review of multiple chemical sensitivity. Occup Environ Med 1999;56:73–85. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.56.2.73.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Miller, CS. White paper: chemical sensitivity: history and phenomenology. Toxicol Ind Health 1994;10:253–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/074823379401000501.Search in Google Scholar

11. Van den Bergh, O, Brown, RJ, Petersen, S, Witthöft, M. Idiopathic environmental intolerance: a comprehensive model. Clin Psychol Sci 2017;5:551–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702617693327.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-01-04
Accepted: 2022-01-24
Published Online: 2022-02-17
Published in Print: 2023-06-27

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 29.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/reveh-2022-0002/html
Scroll to top button