Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton September 21, 2017

The past is a foreign country: disputed memories and telling rights in co-narrated refugee stories

  • Andrew Tanner

    Andrew Tanner is a graduate of the School of Languages and Linguistics at the University of Melbourne. His research interests include narrative and identity, language maintenance and immigration. He is currently a trainer in Documenting and Revitalising Indigenous Languages at the Resource Network for Linguistic Diversity in Melbourne.

    EMAIL logo
    and Lesley Stirling

    Lesley Stirling is a Professor of Linguistics at the University of Melbourne. She completed a PhD in Cognitive Science and Linguistics at the University of Edinburgh in 1989. Her research interests include discourse analysis and interactional linguistics, narrative, perspective and identity, the language and communication of clinical populations, meaning and grammar, and language typology. Her most recent book-length publication is Children’s Play, Storytelling and Pretense: Studies in Culture, Context and ASD (co-edited with Susan Douglas; 2015, Routledge).

From the journal Text & Talk

Abstract

Memory and time are the two fundamental components of personal experience narrative. For a sole narrator with no competing claims for reliability, time distance from the narrated events is more or less irrelevant, and storytelling can proceed smoothly. However, what happens when more than one participant seems to have an equal claim to telling rights? We report a detailed micro-analysis of co-narrated stories of two brothers’ experiences as refugees over 35 years ago to understand how rights are negotiated when both participants have an apparently equal claim to narrative reliability. Our analysis demonstrates that while under normal circumstances the two speakers perform in “duet” – whereby they take the floor in fluid turns – when discrepancies are detected by either party, a round of negotiation following a predictable pattern is triggered before the narrative can continue. The “winner” of the negotiation – typically the speaker with the greatest recall of chronological detail – claims the rights to tell the story solo. The ability to convincingly demonstrate the reliability of one’s memories is therefore a crucial determinant in who can claim telling rights – the authority to be able to tell a story. Our findings support the role of remembered detail in underpinning this authority.

About the authors

Andrew Tanner

Andrew Tanner is a graduate of the School of Languages and Linguistics at the University of Melbourne. His research interests include narrative and identity, language maintenance and immigration. He is currently a trainer in Documenting and Revitalising Indigenous Languages at the Resource Network for Linguistic Diversity in Melbourne.

Lesley Stirling

Lesley Stirling is a Professor of Linguistics at the University of Melbourne. She completed a PhD in Cognitive Science and Linguistics at the University of Edinburgh in 1989. Her research interests include discourse analysis and interactional linguistics, narrative, perspective and identity, the language and communication of clinical populations, meaning and grammar, and language typology. Her most recent book-length publication is Children’s Play, Storytelling and Pretense: Studies in Culture, Context and ASD (co-edited with Susan Douglas; 2015, Routledge).

Acknowledgments

“The past is a foreign country” is a quote from L. P. Hartley’s (1953) novel The Go-Between. We are grateful to the participants who kindly allowed us to record and analyze their stories, and to two anonymous reviewers who provided very helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper.

Appendix. Transcription conventions

((laugh)) ((surprised))

non-linguistic actions or manner of speech

(.)

untimed pause

(.4) (1.0) etc.

timed pause (number indicates seconds)

spe-

self-interruption

=

latched utterances

[speech]

overlapped utterances

spe:

lengthening of previous sound

italics

non-English word

( )

inaudible or unclear speech

(speech)

transcriber’s best guess at unclear speech

°speech°

quiet speech

.hhh

audible intake of breath

sp(h)eech

simultaneous laughter and speech

speech.

falling intonation

speech,

list intonation

speech?

rising intonation

speech!

exclamation

SPEECH

emphatic stress

“speech”

reported speech

References

Bamberg, Michael & Alexandra Georgakopoulou. 2008. Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis. Text & Talk 28(3). 377–396.10.1515/TEXT.2008.018Search in Google Scholar

Blommaert, Jan. 2006. Applied ethnopoetics. Narrative Inquiry 16(1). 181–190.10.1075/ni.16.1.23bloSearch in Google Scholar

Blommaert, Jan. 2009. Language, asylum, and the national order. Current Anthropology 50(4). 415–441.10.1086/600131Search in Google Scholar

Davis, Dona Lee & Dorothy I. Davis. 2010. Dualling memories: Twinship and the disembodiment of identity. In Peter Collins & Anselma Gallinat (eds.), The ethnographic self as resource: Writing memory and experience into ethnography, 129–149. New York: Berghan Books.Search in Google Scholar

Falk, Jane. 1980. The conversational duet. Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 507–514.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1983. The interaction order: American Sociological Association 1982 Presidential Address. American Sociological Review 48(1). 1–17.10.2307/2095141Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles. 1984. Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. In Max Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action, 225–246. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511665868.016Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles. 1986. Audience diversity, participation and interpretation. Text 6(3). 283–316.10.1515/text.1.1986.6.3.283Search in Google Scholar

Harris, Celia, Paul Keil, John Sutton, Amanda Barnier & Doris McIlwain. 2011. We remember, we forget: Collaborative remembering in older couples. Discourse Processes 48(4). 267–303.10.1080/0163853X.2010.541854Search in Google Scholar

Hatoss, Anikó. 2012. Where are you from? Identity construction and experiences of “othering” in the narratives of Sudanese refugee-background Australians. Discourse & Society 23(1). 47–68.10.1177/0957926511419925Search in Google Scholar

Heritage, John & Geoffrey Raymond. 2005. The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in assessment sequences. Social Psychology Quarterly 68(1).15–38.10.1177/019027250506800103Search in Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail. 2004. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Gene Lerne (ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation, 14–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.125.02jefSearch in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1972. The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. In William Labov (ed.), Language in the inner city: Studies in Black English Vernacular, 354–396. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lerner, Gene. 1992. Assisted storytelling: deploying shared knowledge as a practical matter. Qualitative Sociology 15(3). 247–271.10.1007/BF00990328Search in Google Scholar

Marlowe, Jay. 2011. “Walking the line”: Southern Sudanese masculinities and reconciling one’s past with the present. Ethnicities 12(1). 50–66.10.1177/1468796811419605Search in Google Scholar

Mulholland, Joan. 1996. A series of story turns: Intertextuality and collegiality. Text & Talk. 16(4). 535–555.10.1515/text.1.1996.16.4.535Search in Google Scholar

Neisser, Ulric. 1994. Self-narratives: True and false. In Ulric Neisser & Robyn Fivush (eds.), The remembering self: Construction and accuracy in the self-narrative, 1–18. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511752858Search in Google Scholar

Norrick, Neal R. 2000. Conversational narrative: Storytelling in everyday talk. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.203Search in Google Scholar

Norrick, Neal R. 2005. Interactional remembering in conversational narrative. Journal of Pragmatics 37(11). 1819–1844.10.1016/j.pragma.2005.04.005Search in Google Scholar

Norrick, Neal R. 2013. Narratives of vicarious experience in conversation. Language in Society 42(4). 385–406.10.1017/S0047404513000444Search in Google Scholar

Ochs, Elinor & Lisa Capps. 1997. Narrative authenticity. Journal of Narrative and Life History 7(1–4). 83–89.10.1075/jnlh.7.09narSearch in Google Scholar

Ochs, Elinor & Carolyn E. Taylor. 1992a. Family narrative as political activity. Discourse and Society 3(3). 301–340.10.1177/0957926592003003003Search in Google Scholar

Ochs, Elinor & Carolyn E. Taylor. 1992b. Science at dinner. In Cheryl Kramsch & Sally McConnell-Ginet (eds.), Text and context: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on language study, 29–45. Lexington, MA: DC Heath.Search in Google Scholar

Oliveira, Miguel. (1999). The function of self-aggrandizement in storytelling. Narrative Inquiry 9(1). 25–47.10.1075/ni.9.1.03oliSearch in Google Scholar

Pomerantz, Anita. 1980. Telling my side: “Limited access” as a fishing device. Sociological Inquiry 50(3–4). 186–198.10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00020.xSearch in Google Scholar

Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. Giving a source or basis: The practice in conversation of telling “What I know”. Journal of Pragmatics 8(5). 607–625.10.1016/0378-2166(84)90002-XSearch in Google Scholar

Potter, Jonathan. 1996. Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446222119Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey. 1984. On doing “Being Ordinary”. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action, 413–429. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511665868.024Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey. 1995. Lectures on conversation, volumes I and II. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9781444328301Search in Google Scholar

Schank, Roger. 1990. Tell me a story: A new look at real and artificial memory. NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Schweitzer, Robert, Jaimi Greenslade & Ashraf Kagee. 2007. Coping and resilience in refugees from the Sudan: a narrative account. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 41(3). 282–288.10.1080/00048670601172780Search in Google Scholar

Shuman, Amy. 2005. Other people’s stories: Entitlement claims and the critique of empathy. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sidnell, Jack. 2005. Talk and practical epistemology: The social life of knowledge in a Caribbean community. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.142Search in Google Scholar

Singer, Jefferson A. & Peter Salovey. 1993. The remembered self. NY: The Free Press.Search in Google Scholar

Stirling, Lesley & Lenore Manderson. 2011. About you: Authority, objectivity and the generalised you. Journal of Pragmatics 43(6). 1581–1602.10.1016/j.pragma.2010.12.002Search in Google Scholar

Stivers, Tania, Lorenza Mondada & Steensig. Jakob (eds.). 2011. The morality of knowledge in conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Strahan, Tania & Lesley Stirling. 2016. “What the hell was in that wine?”: entitlement to launch and develop stories within a multiparty context. In Lesley Stirling, Jennifer Green, Tania Strahan & Susan Douglas (eds.), Narrative in “Societies of Intimates”, special issue of Narrative Inquiry 26(2). 430–480.Search in Google Scholar

Whalen, Marilyn & Don Zimmerman. 1990. Describing trouble: Practical epistemology in citizen calls to the police. Language in Society 19(4). 465–492.10.1017/S0047404500014779Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-9-21
Published in Print: 2017-11-27

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 26.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/text-2017-0027/html
Scroll to top button