Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter August 15, 2022

Complex dynamical behaviour of predator–prey model with harvesting and multiple delays

  • Amit K. Pal and Ashok Mondal EMAIL logo

Abstract

In this work, we investigate a predator–prey model with Crowley–Martin functional response and constant harvesting. The model is extended by incorporating two constant time delays, where the first delay(τ 1) is for density dependent feedback mechanism in the logistic growth of the prey and the second one is for gestation delay(τ 2) of the predator population. The dynamical behaviours such as positivity, boundedness, extinction criteria and existence, stability and bifurcations of the equilibria of the non-delay model are qualitatively discussed. The existence of periodic solutions via Hopf-bifurcation with respect to absence of delay, single delay and both delays are established. Finally, numerical simulations have been carried out to confirm our numerical results.

AMS Subject Classification: 34D20; 34C23; 34F10

Corresponding author: Ashok Mondal, Department of Mathematics, Regent Education and Research Foundation, Kolkata, India, E-mail:

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

[1] A. A. Berryman, “The orgins and evolution of predator-prey theory,” Ecology, vol. 75, pp. 15–30, 1992. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940005.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Y. Kuang and E. Beretta, “Global qualitative analysis of a ratio-dependent predator–prey system,” J. Math. Biol., vol. 36, pp. 389–406, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002850050105.Search in Google Scholar

[3] J. D. Murray, Mathematical Biology: Spatial Models and Biomedical Applications, New york, Springer, 2003.10.1007/b98869Search in Google Scholar

[4] G. T. Skalski and J. F. Gilliam, “Functional responses with predator interference: viable alternatives to the Holling type II model,” Ecology, vol. 82, no. 11, pp. 3083–3092, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[3083:frwpiv]2.0.co;2.10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[3083:FRWPIV]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

[5] A. Bhattacharyya, S. Bose, A. Mondal, and A. K. Pal, “Modeling and analysis of an one-predator two-prey ecological system with fear effect,” Discontinuity, Nonlinearity, and Complexity, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 585–604, 2021. https://doi.org/10.5890/dnc.2021.12.001.Search in Google Scholar

[6] H. I. Freedman, Deterministic Mathematical Models in Population Ecology, New York, Marcel Dekker, 1980.Search in Google Scholar

[7] X. Y. Meng, H. F. Huo, H. Xiang, and Q. Yin, “Stability in a predator–prey model with Crowley–Martin function and stage structure for prey,” Appl. Math. Comput., vol. 232, pp. 810–819, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2014.01.139.Search in Google Scholar

[8] A. Mondal, A. K. Pal, and G. P. Samanta, “Stability and bifurcation analysis of a delayed three species food chain model with Crowley-Martin response function,” Appl. Appl. Math. (AAM), vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 709–749.Search in Google Scholar

[9] X. Shi, X. Zhou, and X. Song, “Analysis of a stage-structured predator-prey model with Crowley-Martin function,” J. Appl. Math. Comput., vol. 36, pp. 459–472, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12190-010-0413-8.Search in Google Scholar

[10] R. K. Upadhyay and R. K. Naji, “Dynamics of a three species food chain model with Crowley–Martin type functional response,” Chaos, Solit. Fractals, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 1337–1346, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2009.03.020.Search in Google Scholar

[11] P. H. Crowley and E. K. Martin, “Functional responses and interference within and between year classes of a dragonfly population,” J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 211–221, 1989. https://doi.org/10.2307/1467324.Search in Google Scholar

[12] J. R. Beddington and R. M. May, “Maximum sustainable yields in systems subject to harvesting at more than one tropic level,” Math. Biosci., vol. 51, pp. 749–753, 1980.10.1016/0025-5564(80)90103-0Search in Google Scholar

[13] F. Brauer and A. C. Soudack, “Coexistence properties of some predator-prey systems under constant rate harvesting and stocking,” J. Math. Biol., vol. 12, pp. 101–114, 1982. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00275206.Search in Google Scholar

[14] C. W. Clark, Bioeconomic Modelling and Fisheries Management, New York, Wiley, 1985.Search in Google Scholar

[15] C. W. Clark, Mathematical Bioeconomics: The Optimal Management of Renewable Resources, New York, John and Sons, 1990.Search in Google Scholar

[16] J. Huang, Y. Gong, and S. Ruan, “Bifurcation analysis in a predator–prey model with constant-yield predator harvesting,” Discr. Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser.B, vol. 18, pp. 2101–2121, 2013. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.2101.Search in Google Scholar

[17] J. Huang, L. Sanhong, S. Ruan, and X. Zhang, “Bogdanov-Takens bifurcation of codimension 3 in a predator-prey model with constant-yield predator harvesting,” Commun. Pure Appl. Anal., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1053–1067, 2016. https://doi.org/10.3934/cpaa.2016.15.1041.Search in Google Scholar

[18] K. P. Das, “A study of harvesting in a predator–prey model with disease in both populations,” Math. Methods Appl. Sci., vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 2853–2870, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.3735.Search in Google Scholar

[19] G. Peng, Y. Jiang, and C. Li, “Bifurcation of a Holling type II predator prey system with constant rate harvesting,” Int. J. Bif. Chaos, vol. 19, no. 08, pp. 2499–2514, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1142/s021812740902427x.Search in Google Scholar

[20] M. MacDonald, Biological Delay System: Linear Stability Theory, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1989.Search in Google Scholar

[21] R. M. May, Theoretical Ecology: Principals and Applications, Oxford, Blackwell Sci. Publ., 1981.Search in Google Scholar

[22] A. Maiti, A. K. Pal, and G. P. Samanta, “Effect of time-delay on a food chain model,” Appl. Math. Comput., vol. 200, no. 1, pp. 189–203, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2007.11.011.Search in Google Scholar

[23] A. Mondal, A. K. Pal, and G. P. Samanta, “Analysis of a delayed eco-epidemiological pest–plant model with infected pest,” Biophys. Rev. Lett., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 141–170, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1793048019500061.Search in Google Scholar

[24] B. Barman and B. Ghosh, “Explicit impacts of harvesting in delayed predator-prey models,” Chaos, Solit. Fractals, vol. 122, pp. 213–228, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2019.03.002.Search in Google Scholar

[25] M. Liao, X. Tang, and C. Xu, “Bifurcation analysis for a three species predator-prey system with two delays,” Commn. Nonl. Sci. Num. Simu., vol. 17, pp. 183–194, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2011.03.040.Search in Google Scholar

[26] A. Mondal, A. K. Pal, and G. P. Samanta, “Evolutionary dynamics of a single-species population model with multiple delays in a polluted environment,” Discontinuity, Nonlinearity, and Complexity, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 433–459, 2020. https://doi.org/10.5890/dnc.2020.09.007.Search in Google Scholar

[27] A. Mondal, A. K. Pal, and G. P. Samanta, “Rich dynamics of non-toxic phytoplankton, toxic phytoplankton and zooplankton system with multiple gestation delays,” Int. J. of Dyna. and Cont., vol. 8, pp. 112–131, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-018-0501-4.Search in Google Scholar

[28] C. Xu, M. Liao, and X. He, “Bifurcation analysis for a three species predator-prey system with two delays,” Int. J. Appl. Math. Comt. Sci., vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 97–107, 2011. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10006-011-0007-0.Search in Google Scholar

[29] L. Perko, Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems, NY, Springer-Verlag, 2001.10.1007/978-1-4613-0003-8Search in Google Scholar

[30] J. D. Murray, Mathematical Biology, Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1989.10.1007/978-3-662-08539-4Search in Google Scholar

[31] B. Barman and B. Ghosh, “Role of time delay and harvesting in some predator–prey communities with different functional responses and intra-species competition,” Int. J. Model. Simulat., 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/02286203.2021.1983747, In press.Search in Google Scholar

[32] N. C. Pati and B. Ghosh, “Delayed carrying capacity induced subcritical and supercritical Hopf bifurcations in a predator–prey system,” Math. Comput. Simulat., vol. 195, pp. 171–196, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2022.01.008.Search in Google Scholar

[33] J. K. Hale, Theory of Functional Differential Equations, Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag, 1977.10.1007/978-1-4612-9892-2Search in Google Scholar

[34] H. I. Freedman and V. S. H. Rao, “The tradeoff between mutual interference and time lag in predator prey models,” Bull. Math. Biol., vol. 45, pp. 991–1004, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8240(83)80073-1.Search in Google Scholar

[35] T. Kajiwara, T. Sasaki, and Y. Takeuchi, “Construction of Lyapunov functionals for delay differential equations in virology and epidemiology,” Nonlinear Anal. R. World Appl., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1802–1826, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2011.12.011.Search in Google Scholar

[36] K. Manna and S. P. Chakborty, “Global stability of one and two discreate delay models for chronic hepatitis B infection with HBV DNA containing capsides,” Comput. Appl. Math., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 525–536, 2017.10.1007/s40314-015-0242-3Search in Google Scholar

[37] J. P. LaSalle, The Stability of Dynamical Systems, Philadelphia, Penn, USA, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1976.10.1137/1.9781611970432Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-05-09
Revised: 2022-06-14
Accepted: 2022-07-13
Published Online: 2022-08-15
Published in Print: 2023-01-27

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 11.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/zna-2022-0131/html
Scroll to top button