Title: Transverse post-tensioning arrangement for side-by-side box-beam bridges
Date: Spring, 2012
Volume: 57
Issue: 2
Page number: 48-63
Author(s): Nabil F. Grace, Elin A. Jensen, Mena R. Bebawy
https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.03012012.48.63

Click here to access the full journal article

Abstract

While side-by-side box-beam bridges have numerous structural advantages, a serious drawback for this type of bridge is the longitudinal deck cracking over the shear keys. These cracks are observed as early as a few years after initial construction, even where transverse post-tensioning is applied. Associated distresses are well documented in the literature. Two hypotheses were established: longitudinal deck cracking in side-by-side box-beam bridges may be mitigated through an optimized transverse post-tensioning arrangement and traffic is not the sole load factor controlling longitudinal deck cracking. This broad study, encompassing field observations as well as experimental and numerical investigations, demonstrates that a transverse post-tensioning system can be determined as a function of bridge geometry such that deck cracking due to temperature and traffic loads is mitigated. The recommended transverse post-tensioning system is defined by the number of diaphragms and the force applied at each diaphragm.

References

1. Michigan Department of Transportation Construction and Technology Division. 2005. Box-Beam Concerns Found under the Bridge. C & T Research Record, No. 102 (September): pp. 1–4.

2. Lall, J., S. Alampalli, and E. F. Di Cocco. 1998. Performance of Full-Depth Shear Keys in Adjacent Prestressed Box Beam Bridges. PCI Journal, V. 43, No. 2 (March–April): pp. 72–79.

3. Gilberston, C., U. Attanayake, T. Ahlborn, and H. Aktan. 2006. Prestressed Concrete Box-Beam Bridge Performance: Condition Assessment and Design Analysis. 06-2432. Washington, DC:  Transportation Research Board.

4. Huckelbridge, A., H. El-Esnawi, and F. Moses. 1995. Shear Key Performance in Multi Beam Box Girder Bridges. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, V. 9, No. 4 (November): pp.  271–285.

5. Bakht, B., L. G. Jaeger, and M. S. Cheung. 1983. Transverse Shear in Multi Beam Bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering, V. 109, No. 4 (April): pp. 936–949.

6. El-Remaily, A., M. K. Tadros, T. Yamane, and G. Krause. 1996. Transverse Design of Adjacent Precast Prestressed Concrete Box Girder Bridges. PCI Journal, V. 41, No. 4 (July–August): pp.   96–112.

7. Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) Construction and Technology Support Area. 2006. MDOT Bridge Design Guides. Lansing, MI: MDOT.

8. Miller, R. A., G. M. Hlavacs, T. Long, and A. Greuel. 1999. Full-Scale Testing of Shear Keys for Adjacent Box Girder Bridges. PCI Journal, V. 44, No. 6 (November– December): pp. 80–90.

9. Hlavacs, G., T. Long, R. Miller, and T. Baseheart. 1997. Nondestructive Determination of Response of Shear Keys to Environmental and Structural Cyclic Loading. Transportation Research Record,   V. 1574:  pp. 18–24.

10. American Association of State Highway and TransportationOfficials (AASHTO). 2004. AASHTO LRFD  Bridge Design Specifications. 3rd ed. Washington,DC: AASHTO.

11. Labib, M. 2007. Effect of Transverse Post-tensioning on Load Distribution in Side-by-Side CFRP Prestressed Concrete Box Beam Bridges. Master’s thesis, Civil Engineering Department, Lawrence  Technological  University, Southfield, MI.

12. Bebawy, M. 2007. Optimum Transverse Post-tensioning Arrangement for Side-by-side Box Beam Bridges. Master’s thesis, Civil Engineering Department, Lawrence Technological University,  Southfield, MI.

13. Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen Inc. 2006. ABAQUS 6.6 User’s Manual. Pawtucket, RI: Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen Inc.

14. Michigan Department of Transportation Construction and Technology Support Area. 2005. MDOT Bridge  Analysis Guide. Lansing, MI: MDOT.

15. Grace, N. F., and G. Abdel-Sayed. 2000. Behavior of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Prestressed Concrete Skew Bridge. ACI Structural Journal, V. 97, No. 1 (January– February): pp. 26–34.

16. Grace, N. F., F. C. Navarre, R. B. Nacey, W. Bonus, and L. Collavino. 2002. Design-Construction of Bridge Street Bridge - First CFRP Bridge in the United States. PCI Journal, V. 47, No. 5  (September– October): pp. 20–35.

17. Grace, N. F., T. Enomoto, and K. Yagi. 2002. Behavior of CFCC and CFRP Leadline Prestressing Systems in Bridge Construction. PCI Journal, V. 47, No. 3 (May– June): pp. 90–103.

18. Kwasniewski, L., M. M. Szerszen, and A. S. Nowak. 2000. Sensitivity Analysis for Slab-on-Girder Bridges. Paper PMC2000-316. In Proceedings of the 8th ASCE Joint Specialty Conference on  Probabilistic Mechanics and Structural Reliability. Kareem, Haldar, Spencer, and Johnson, eds. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame. CD-ROM.