Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of Soil Grading on the Mechanical Behavior of Earth Cement Blocks

  • Article
  • Published:
MRS Advances Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The characteristics of earth cement blocks depend on soil composition, grading of the soil, cement-soil ratio and water content, etc… In the present study, an experimental program is conducted to evaluate the influence of soil grading in the mechanical properties of earth cement blocks. Five gradings of soil used for the preparation of earth cement blocks. Soil grading effect on following properties of earth-cement blocks such as block density, compressive strength in wet and dry condition, flexural tensile strength in wet and dry condition, and water absorption was compared. Results show that the properties of the earth cement blocks are dependent upon the fine content and uniformity coefficient of the soil. The increase in the finer content in mortar improves water absorption, compressive strength and flexural tensile strength.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. Sathiparan and H.T.S.M. De Zoysa, The effects of using agricultural waste as partial substitute for sand in cement blocks, Journal of Building Engineering 19, 216–227 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. E.A. Adam and A.R.A. Agib, Graphoprint for the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. France, Paris: UNESCO (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  3. B.V. Venkatarama Reddy, R. Lal and K.S. Nanjunda, Optimum soil grading for the soil-cement blocks, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 19, 139–148 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. P. Nshimiyimana, H. Moussa, A. Messan, and L. Courard, Effect of production and curing conditions on the performance of stabilized compressed earth blocks: Kaolinite vs quartz-rich earthen material. MRS Advances 5, 1277–1283 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. P. Nshimiyimana, D. Miraucourt, A. Messan, and L. Courard, Calcium carbide residue and rice husk ash for improving the compressive strength of compressed earth blocks. MRS Advances 3, 2009–2014 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. B. Asare and Y. Danyuo, Mechanical characterization of earth-based composites materials reinforced with treated bamboo fibres for affordable housing. MRS Advances 5, 1313–1321 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. K. Thanushan, Y. Yogananth, P. Sangeeth, J. Gracian and N. Sathiparan, Strength and durability characteristics of coconut fibre reinforced earth cement blocks, Journal of Natural Fibers (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2019.1652220

  8. W. Benhaoua, K. Grine and S. Kenai, Performance of stabilized earth with wheat straw and slag. MRS Advances 5, 1285–1294 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. H.M. Kwon, A.T. Le and N.T. Nguyen, Influence of soil grading on properties of compressed cement-soil, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 14 (6), 845–853 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. V.G. Haach, G. Vasconcelos and P.B. Lourenço, Influence of aggregates grading and water/cement ratio in workability and hardened properties of mortars, Construction and Building Materials 25, 2980–2987 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. L. Guifeng, L. Shichao, C. Zhengfa and Q. Yanlong, Effect of different grain grading of manufactured-sands on properties of dry-mixed mortar, Applied Mechanics and Materials 507, 429–433 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. T.G. Hughes Mohammed and A. Abubakar, Importance of sand grading on the compressive strength and stiffness of lime mortar in small scale model studies, Open Journal of Civil Engineering 5, 372–378, (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. F.R. Arooz, R.U. Halwatura, Mud-concrete block (MCB): mix design & durability characteristics, Case Studies in Construction Materials 8 (2018) 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Specification for cement blocks, Part 1: Requirements SLS 855, Sri Lanka Standards Institution, Sri Lanka (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Mayooran, S. Ragavan, and N. Sathiparan, Comparative study on open air burnt low- and high-carbon rice husk ash as partial cement replacement in cement block production, Journal of Building Engineering 13, 137–145 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. ASTM C140/C140M, Standard test methods for sampling and testing concrete masonry units and related units. American Society for Testing and Materials International, West Conshohocken (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  17. BS EN 772-1, Methods of test for masonry units - Part 1: Determination of compressive strength. Brussels: Comité Européen de Normalisation, Brussels (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  18. BS EN 1015-11, Methods of test for mortar for masonry - Part 11: Determination of flexural and compressive strength of hardened mortar. Brussels: Comité Européen de Normalisation, Brussels (1999).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Navaratnarajah Sathiparan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jeyasegaram, S., Sathiparan, N. Influence of Soil Grading on the Mechanical Behavior of Earth Cement Blocks. MRS Advances 5, 2771–2782 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1557/adv.2020.317

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/adv.2020.317

Navigation