Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Advantages of a Salt/Bentonite Backfill for Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Disposal Rooms

  • Articles
  • Published:
MRS Online Proceedings Library Aims and scope

Abstract

This paper concludes that a 70 wt% salt/30 wt% bentonite mixture is preferable to pure crshed salt as backfill for disposal rooms in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. The performance of two backfill materials is examined with regard to various selection crteria related to compliance with the transuranic radioactive waste standard 40 CFR 191, Subpart B, such as the need for low liquid permeability after closure, chemical stability, strength, ease of emplacement, and sorption potential for brine and radionuclides. Both salt and salt/bentonite are expected to consolidate to a final state of permeability ≤ 10-18 m2, which is adequate for satisfying government regulations for nuclear repositories. The real advantage of the salt/bentonite backfill depends, therefore, on bentonite’s potential for sorbing brine and radionuclides. Estimates of the impact of these properties on backfill performance are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B.M. Butcher, C.F. Novak, and J. Jercinovic, The Advantages of a Salt/Bentonite Backfill for Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Disposal Rooms, SAND90-3074 (Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1991).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. A.R. Lappin, R.L. Hunter, D.P. Garber, and P.B. Davies, eds., Systems Analysis, Long-Term Radionuclide Transport, and Dose Assessments, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). Southeastern New Mexico: March 1989, SAND89-0462 (Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  3. T.W. Pfeifle. Consolidation. Permeability, and Strength of Crushed Salt/Bentonite Mixtures With Application to the WIPP, SAND90-7009 (Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  4. C.M. Stone, R.D. Krieg, and Z.E. Beisinger, SANCHQ, A Finite Element Computer Program for the Quasistatic. Large Deformation. Inelastic Response of Two-Dimensional Solids, SAND84-2618 (Sandia National Laboratories Report, Albuquerque, NM, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.R. Weatherby and W.T. Brown, in A Summary of the Models Used for the Mechanical Response of Disposal Rooms in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant with Regard to Compliance with 40 CFR 191. Subpart B, B.M. Butcher and F.T. Mendenhall, SAND92-0427 (Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1993), pp. A–199 through A-222.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D.J. Holcomb, and M. Shields, Hydrostatic Creep Consolidation of Crushed Salt With Added Water, SAND87-1990 (Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.C. Stormont, Preliminary Seal Design Evaluation for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, SAND87-3083 (Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1988).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. G. Kappei, Geotechnical Investigations on Backfill Materials in the Asse Salt Mine, GSF-T-250 (Gesellschaft für Strahlen-und Umweltforschung München, Brunswick, F.R. Germany, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  9. T.W. Pfeifle and N.S. Brodsky, Swelling Pressure, Water Uptake, and Permeability of 70/30 Crushed Salt/Bentonite, SAND91-7070 (Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.L. Krumhansl, Observations Regarding the Stability of Bentonite Backfill in a High-Level Waste (HLW) Repository in Rock Salt, SAND83-1293 (Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  11. L.D. Tyler, R.V. Matalucci, M.A. Molecke, D.E. Munson, E.J. Nowak, and J.C. Stormont, Summary Report for the WIPP Technology Development Program for Isolation of Radioactive Waste, SAND88-0844 (Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Pusch and O. Karnland, Aspects of the Physical State of Smectite-Adsorbed Water. SKB Technical Report 86-25 (Srensk Kärnbränsleförsörjning A.B., Stockholm, Sweden, 1986).

  13. C.F. Novak, in The Advantages of a Salt/Bentonite Backfill for Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Disposal Rooms, B.M. Butcher, C.F. Novak, and M. Jercinovic, SAND90-3074 (Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1991), pp. B–2 through B-7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sandia National Laboratories, PO Box 5800, Albuquerque, NM, 87185, USA

    B. M. Butcher

Authors
  1. B. M. Butcher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Butcher, B.M. The Advantages of a Salt/Bentonite Backfill for Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Disposal Rooms. MRS Online Proceedings Library 333, 911–917 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-333-911

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-333-911

Search

Navigation