Abstract
Electron beam lithography still represents the most effective way to pattern materials at the nanoscale, especially in the case of structures, which are not indefinitely repeating a simple motif. The success of e-beam lithography depends on the availability of suitable resists. There is a substantial variety of resist materials, from PMMA to calixarenes, to choose from to achieve high resolution in electron-beam lithography. However, these materials suffer from the limitation of poor sensitivity and poor contrast.
In both direct-write and projection e-beam systems the maximum beam current for a given resolution is limited by space-charge effects. In order to make the most efficient use of the available current, the resist must be as sensitive as possible. This leads, naturally, to the use of chemically amplified (CA) systems. Unfortunately, in the quest for ever smaller feature sizes and higher throughputs, even chemically amplified materials are limited: ultimately, sensitivity and resolution are not independent. Current resists already operate in the regime of < 1 electron/nm2. In this situation detailed models are the only way to understand material performance and limits.
Resist requirements, including sensitivity, etch selectivity, environmental stability, outgassing, and line-edge roughness as they pertain to, high-voltage (100 kV) direct write and projection electron-beam exposure systems are described. Experimental results obtained on CA resists in the SCALPEL® exposure system are presented and the fundamental sensitivity limits of CA and conventional materials in terms of shot-noise and resolution limits in terms of electron-beam solid interactions are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
F. Abboud, Ki-Ho Baik, V. Chakarian, D. Cole, J. Daniel, R. Dean, M. Gesley, Maiying Lu, R. Naber, T. Newman, F. Raymond, D. Trost, M. Wiltse, W. DeVore, Proc. SPIE 4562, 1 (2002).
J.A. Liddle, L.R. Harriott and W.K. Waskiewicz, Microlithography World, 6, 15 (1997).
S. D. Golladay, H. C. Pfeiffer, J. D. Rockrohr, and W. Stickel, J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B18, 3072 (2000).
R.L. Brainard, G.G. Barclay, E.H. Anderson, L.E. Ocola, Microelectronic Engineering, 61–62, 707 (2002)
Y. Ohnishi, M. Mizuko, H. Gokan and S. Fujiwara, J. Vac. Sci. Technol., 19, 1141 (1981).
R. Kunz et al., Proc. SPIE 2724, 365 (1996).
L.E. Ocola, to appear in J. Vac. Sci. Technol., Proceedings of the 46th EIPBN meeting.
M.J. Bowden, L.F. Thompson and J.P. Ballantyne, J. Vac. Sci. Technol., 12, 1294 (1975).
L.F. Thompson, J.P. Ballantyne and E.D. Feit, M.J. Bowden, L.F. Thompson and J.P. Ballantyne, J. Vac. Sci. Technol., 12, 1280 (1975).
R.D. Allen, W.E. Conley and R.R. Kunz, in Microlithography, Micromachining and Microfabrication, edited by P. Rai-Choudhury (SPIE Optical Engineering Press, Bellingahm, 1997), p. 321.
M. M. Mkrtchyan, J. A. Liddle, S. D. Berger, L. R. Harriott, J. M. Gibson and A. M. Schwartz, J. of Appl. Phys., 78, 6888 (1995).
M. M. Mkrtchyan, J. A. Liddle, S. T. Stanton, E. Munro, W. K. Waskiewicz, Microelectronic Engineering, 53, 299 (2000).
N. Fares, S. Stanton, J. Liddle and G. Gallatin, J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B18, 3115 (2000).
S.T. Stanton, Proc. SPIE, 4343, 138 (2001).
K. Okamato, K. Suzuki, H. Pfeiffer and M. Sogard, Solid State Technol., May, 118 (2000)
B.H. Koek, T. Chisholm, A.J. van Run, J. Romijn, J.P. Davey, Microelectronic Engineering, 23, 81 (1994).
M. Mkrtchyan, G. Gallatin, A. Liddle, X. Zhu, E. Munro, W. Waskiewicz, D. Muller, Microelectronic Engineering, 57–58, 277 (2001).
H.I. Smith, J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B4, 148 (1986).
G.M. Gallatin and J.A. Liddle, Microelecronic Engineering., 46 365 (1999)
S. Tagawa, S. Nagahara, Y. Yamamoto, D. Werst and A.D. Trifunac, Proc. SPIE 3999, 204 (2000).
A. Saeki, T. Kozawa, Y. Yoshida and S. Tagawa, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 41, 4213 (2002)
G.M. Gallatin, Proc. SPIE, 4404, 123 (2001).
F.A. Houle, W.D. Hinsberg, M.I. Sanchez and J.A. Hoffnagle, J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B20, 924 (2002).
W.D. Hinsberg, F.A. Houle, M.I. Sanchez and G.M. Wallraff, IBM J. Res. & Dev. 45, 667 (2001).
L.E. Ocola, Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 705, Y.1.1.1 (2002)
F. A. Houle, W. D. Hinsberg, M. Morrison, M. I. Sanchez, G. Wallraff, C. Larson, and J. Hoffnagle, J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B18, 1874 (2000).
E.H. Anderson, D.L. Olynick, W. Chao, B. Harteneck and E. Veklerov, J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B18, 2970 (2000).
D.C. Joy, Microelectronic Engineering, 1, 103 (1983).
L.E. Ocola, Microelectronic Engineering, 53, 433 (2000).
D.C. Joy, http://web.utk.edu/~srcutk/htm/interact.htm
D.R. Allee, C.P. Umbach and A.N. Broers, J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B9, 2838 (1991).
J.M. Macaulay “The production of nanometre structures in inorganic materials by electron beams of high current density”, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge (1989).
J.M. Macaulay, R.M. Allen, L.M. Brown, S.D. Berger, Microelectronic Engineering, 9, 57 (1989)
A.N. Broers, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 416, 1 (1988).
A.N. Broers, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A, 353, 291 (1995).
M. Williamson, A. Neureuther, Proc. SPIE, 3999, 1189 (2000).
M. Sato, L.E. Ocola, A.E. Novembre, K. Ohmori, K. Ishikawa, K. Katsumata and T. Nakayama, J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B17, 2873 (1999).
K.E. Gonsalves, L. Merhari, H. Wu, and Y. Hu, Advanced Materials, 13, 703 (2001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alexander Liddle, J., Gallatin, G.M. & Ocola, L.E. Resist Requirements and Limitations for Nanoscale Electron-Beam Patterning. MRS Online Proceedings Library 739, 15 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-739-H1.5
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-739-H1.5