Skip to main content
Log in

Incorporating Biodopants into PEDOT Conducting Polymers: Impact of Biodopant on polymer properties and biocompatibility

  • Published:
MRS Online Proceedings Library Aims and scope

Abstract

Poly(3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) was polymerized with the biological dopants dextran sulphate and chondroitin sulphate. Polymer physical and mechanical properties were investigated using quartz crystal microgravimetry with dissipation monitoring and atomic force microscopy, revealing polymer shear modulus and interfacial roughness to be significantly altered as a function of the dopant species. The adsorption of fibronectin, an important extracellular protein that is critical for a range of cellular functions and processes, was investigated using QCM-D, revealing protein adsorption to be increased on the DS doped PEDOT film relative to the CS doped film. PEDOT films have traditionally been doped with synthetic counterions such as polystyrene sulphonate (PSS), however the incorporation of biological molecules as the counterion, which has been shown to improve polymer biofunctionality, has received far less attention. In particular, there has been little detailed study on the impact of incorporating polyelectrolyte biomolecules into the PEDOT polymer matrix on fundamental polymer properties which are critical for biomedical applications. This investigation provides a detailed characterization of the interfacial and mechanical properties of biologically doped PEDOT films, as well as the efficacy of the composite films to bind and retain extracellular proteins of the type that are critical to the biocompatibility of the polymeric material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R.T Richardson, B. Thompson, S. Moulton, C. Newbold, M.G Lum and A. Cameron, Biomat. 28(3), 513 – 523 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. C.E Schmidt, V.R Shastri, J.P. Vacanti, R and Langer, R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94(17), 8948 – 8953 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Gelmi, M.J. Higgins and G.G. Wallace, Biomat. 31, 1974 – 1983 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. C.A. Wilson, R.E. Clegg, D.I. Leavesley and M.J. Pearcy, Tissue Engineering 11, 1–18 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. A.J. Engler, M.A. Griffin, S. Sen, C.G. Bonnemann, H.L. Sweeney and D.E. Discher. J. Cell Biol. 166(6), 877–887 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. T. Chaudhuri, F. Rehfeldt, H.L. Sweeney and D.E. Discher. Methods Mol. Biol. 621, 185–202 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Molino, P.J., Tibbens, A., Kapsa, R.M.I. et al. Incorporating Biodopants into PEDOT Conducting Polymers: Impact of Biodopant on polymer properties and biocompatibility. MRS Online Proceedings Library 1569, 225–230 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1557/opl.2013.1090

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/opl.2013.1090

Navigation