Abstract
178
The history of election debates is a clear reflection of the political context of a country at such an important moment as the general elections. Spain and Serbia are two countries of different democratic culture and political reality; however, in the two states there is a recent tradition of political debates that are organized in general, parliamentary and presidential election campaigns. The main objective of this study is a comparative analysis of the format of these electoral television programs in order to observe the results, the main similarities and differences in the realization, the discussed topics, the role of the moderators and the spatial and temporal distribution. In Spain, before the general elections in 2015, three debates were organized between two candidates (PP-PSOE), among three (PSOE-Podemos-Ciudadanos) and four candidates (PP-PSOE-Podemos-Ciudadanos). The debates were organized by the Academy of Television Sciences and Arts, El País Digital and Atresmedia group, respectively. In June 2016, new general elections were held in Spain because the political parties failed to form a government with previous results. This time only one debate was organized among four candidates (PP-PSOE-Podemos-Ciudadanos). On the other hand, in the last parliamentary elections in Serbia, on April 24, 2016, three debates were organized, on 19, 20 and 21 April, in which participated up to 10 parties and citizens' movements. All debates were organized by Radio Television of Serbia and the Center for Free Elections and Democracy (CeSID).
Keywords
Debate, general elections, Serbia, Spain, television formats, audiovisual
Details
Article Details
Section
Special Issue: Articles: Political Communication Today: Challenges and Threats
RIGHTS TRANSFER
By submitting the article for evaluation and subsequent publication in Communication & Society, the AUTHOR exclusively assigns the rights of public communication, reproduction, distribution and sale for commercial exploitation to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, for the maximum legal term in force -the entire life of the author and seventy years after his death or declaration of death-, in any country, and in any of the current and future edition modalities, both in print and electronic versions.
In the event that the article is not accepted for publication , this transfer of rights lapses with the communication of the refusal to the AUTHOR.
The AUTHOR affirms that the article is unpublished, that it has not been sent simultaneously to another publication medium and that the rights have not been transferred exclusively previously. He is responsible to the University of Navarra through its Publications Service for the authorship and originality of his work, as well as for all pecuniary charges that may arise for the University of Navarra through its Publications Service, in favor of third parties due to actions, claims or conflicts arising from the breach of obligations by the AUTHOR.