페미니스트 페다고지의 정치, 윤리, 미학

@article{ART001263410},
author={ 최성희 },
title={페미니스트 페다고지의 정치, 윤리, 미학},
journal={영미문학페미니즘},
issn={1226-9689},
year={2008},
volume={16},
number={1},
pages={167-188},
doi={10.15796/fsel.2008.16.1.008},
url={http://dx.doi.org/10.15796/fsel.2008.16.1.008}

TY - JOUR
AU - 최성희
TI - 페미니스트 페다고지의 정치, 윤리, 미학
T2 - 영미문학페미니즘
PY - 2008
VL - 16
IS - 1
PB - 한국영미문학페미니즘학회
SP - 167-188
SN - 1226-9689
AB - The purpose of this paper is to share and to analyze problems and issues discussed by major scholars of feminist pedagogy. I review their criticism of traditional approaches (including critical pedagogy) that over-emphasize reason/theory while neglecting (women’s) emotion/experience. Martindale's critique of so-called “nurturing” pedagogy, Middleton’s “life history pedagogy,” Jung’s “conflict pedagogy,” and Orner and Ellsworth’s criticism of moral superiority of paternalistic critical pedagogy all reject superficial compromise and harmony and call for more active confrontations with ambiguities and conflicts that are embedded in women's experience and desire. Lastly, drawing upon recent works that endeavor to recuperate the power of ‘eros’ in the classroom as a transgressing, expanding, and combining life force, I argue for an ‘erotic feminist pedagogy’ and its aesthetical power that could counter the logocentric which ironically dominates even the most anti-phallogocentric discourses such as feminism. Rather than insisting that we abandon all prescriptions for objectivity in knowledge, however, I attempt to reclaim the importance of embodied pleasure in pedagogical work. The forces of eros, which I dub the “desire to dance,” must be mobilized in the classroom as a counter-hegemonic force to stand against the ever increasing institutionalization of scholarship and education. In sum, this paper attempts to introduce into Korean feminist scholarship ways of theorizing feminist pedagogy that have been developing in the humanities since the 1980s.
KW - feminist pedagogy, critical pedagogy, bell hooks, nurturing, experience, life history, revisionary rhetoric, eros
DO - 10.15796/fsel.2008.16.1.008
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.15796/fsel.2008.16.1.008
ER -

최성희 (2008). 페미니스트 페다고지의 정치, 윤리, 미학. 영미문학페미니즘, 16( 1), 167- 188.

최성희 . 2008, “페미니스트 페다고지의 정치, 윤리, 미학”, 영미문학페미니즘, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 167-188. Available from: doi:10.15796/fsel.2008.16.1.008

최성희 “페미니스트 페다고지의 정치, 윤리, 미학” 영미문학페미니즘 16.1 pp. 167-188 (2008): 167.

최성희 . 페미니스트 페다고지의 정치, 윤리, 미학 영미문학페미니즘 [Internet]. 2008; 16( 1), : 167-188. Available from: doi:10.15796/fsel.2008.16.1.008

최성희 . “페미니스트 페다고지의 정치, 윤리, 미학” 영미문학페미니즘 16, no.1 (2008): 167-188. doi: 10.15796/fsel.2008.16.1.008

홈 권호 목록 논문 목록 논문 상세

페미니스트 페다고지의 정치, 윤리, 미학

영미문학페미니즘

약어 : FSEL

2008, vol.16, no.1, pp.167 - 188

DOI : 10.15796/fsel.2008.16.1.008

발행기관 : 한국영미문학페미니즘학회

연구분야 : 영어와문학

최성희¹

¹이화여자대학교

인용한 논문 수 : 19 서지 간략 보기

초록

The purpose of this paper is to share and to analyze problems and issues discussed by major scholars of feminist pedagogy. I review their criticism of traditional approaches (including critical pedagogy) that over-emphasize reason/theory while neglecting (women’s) emotion/experience. Martindale's critique of so-called “nurturing” pedagogy, Middleton’s “life history pedagogy,” Jung’s “conflict pedagogy,” and Orner and Ellsworth’s criticism of moral superiority of paternalistic critical pedagogy all reject superficial compromise and harmony and call for more active confrontations with ambiguities and conflicts that are embedded in women's experience and desire. Lastly, drawing upon recent works that endeavor to recuperate the power of ‘eros’ in the classroom as a transgressing, expanding, and combining life force, I argue for an ‘erotic feminist pedagogy’ and its aesthetical power that could counter the logocentric which ironically dominates even the most anti-phallogocentric discourses such as feminism. Rather than insisting that we abandon all prescriptions for objectivity in knowledge, however, I attempt to reclaim the importance of embodied pleasure in pedagogical work. The forces of eros, which I dub the “desire to dance,” must be mobilized in the classroom as a counter-hegemonic force to stand against the ever increasing institutionalization of scholarship and education. In sum, this paper attempts to introduce into Korean feminist scholarship ways of theorizing feminist pedagogy that have been developing in the humanities since the 1980s.

키워드

feminist pedagogy, critical pedagogy, bell hooks, nurturing, experience, life history, revisionary rhetoric, eros

참고문헌(21)

[단행본] Belenky, Mary / 1986 / Women’s Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind / Basic Books
[학술지] Currie, Dawn / 1992 / Subject-Ivity in the Classroom: Feminism Meets Academe / Canadian Journal of Education 17 (3) : 341 ~ 364
[학술지] Ebert, Teresa L. / 1996 / For a Red Pedagogy: Feminism, Desire, and Need / College English 58 (7) : 795 ~ 819
[단행본] Freire, Paulo / 1970 / Pedagody of the Oppressed / Continuum
[학술지] Green, Jill / 2000 / Emancipatory Pedagogy?: Women’s Bodies and the Creative Process in ?Dance / Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies 21 (3) : 124 ~ 140
[단행본] hooks, bell / 1989 / Talking Back: Thinking Feminist, Thinking Black / South End
[단행본] hooks, bell / 1984 / Educating Women: A Feminist Agenda.” Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center / South End : 107 ~ 115
[단행본] hooks, bell / Black and Female: Reflections on Graduate School.” Talking Back: Thinking Feminist / Thinking Black : 55 ~ 61
[단행본] hooks, bell / Pedagogy and Political Commitment: A Comment.” Talking Back: Thinking? Feminist / Thinking Black : 98 ~ 104
[단행본] hooks, bell / 1994 / Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom / Routledge
[단행본] hooks, bell / Eros, Eroticism, and the Pedagogical Process.” Teaching to Transgress / Education as the Practice of Freedom : 191 ~ 199
[단행본] Jung, Julie / 2005 / Revisionary Rhetoric, Feminist Pedagogy, and Multigenre Texts.?Carbondale / Southern Illinois UP
[단행본] Luke, Carmen / 1992 / Feminisms and Critical Pedagogy / Routledge
[학술지] Martindale, Kathleen / 1992 / Theorizing Autobiography and Materialist Feminist Pedagogy / Canadian Journal of Education 17 (3) : 321 ~ 340
[학술지] McWilliam, Erica / 1996 / Touchy Subjects: A Risky Inquiry into Pedagogical Pleasure / British Educational Research Journal 22 (3) : 305 ~ 317
[단행본] Middleton, Sue / 1993 / Educating Feminists: Life Histories and Pedagogy / Teachers College P
[학술지] Pelligrini, Ann / 1999 / Pedagogy’s Turn: Observations on Students, Teachers, and Transference-Love / Critical Inquiry 25 (3) : 617 ~ 625
[학술지] Rowley, Michelle / 2007 / Rethinking Interdisciplinarity: Meditations on the Sacred Possibilities of an Erotic Feminist Pedagogy / Small Axe 24 : 139 ~ 153
[단행본] Spivak, Gayatri / 1999 / A Critique of Postcolonial Reason / Harvard UP
[기타] / http://krdic.naver.com>
[기타] / http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emma_Goldman>