Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Non-hormonal interventions for hot flushes in women with a history of breast cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hot flushes are common in women with a history of breast cancer. Hormonal therapies are known to reduce these symptoms but are not recommended in women with a history of breast cancer due to their potential adverse effects. The efficacy of non-hormonal therapies is still uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of non-hormonal therapies in reducing hot flushes in women with a history of breast cancer.

METHODS

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library), Medline, Embase, Lilacs, CINAHL, PsycINFO (August 2008) and WHO ICTRP Search Portal. We handsearched reference lists of reviews and included articles, reviewed conference proceedings and contacted experts.

Selection criteria: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing non-hormonal therapies with placebo or no therapy for reducing hot flushes in women with a history of breast cancer.

Data collection and analysis: Two authors independently selected potentially relevant studies, decided upon their inclusion and extracted data on participant characteristics, interventions, outcomes and the risk of bias of included studies.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixteen RCTs met our inclusion criteria. We included six studies on selective serotonin (SSRI) and serotonin-norepinephrine (SNRI) reuptake inhibitors, two on clonidine, one on gabapentin, two each on relaxation therapy and homeopathy, and one each on vitamin E, magnetic devices and acupuncture. The risk of bias of most studies was rated as low or moderate. Data on continuous outcomes were presented inconsistently among studies, which precluded the possibility of pooling the results. Three pharmacological treatments (SSRIs and SNRIs, clonidine and gabapentin) reduced the number and severity of hot flushes. One study assessing vitamin E did not show any beneficial effect. One of two studies on relaxation therapy showed a significant benefit. None of the other non-pharmacological therapies had a significant benefit. Side-effects were inconsistently reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Clonidine, SSRIs and SNRIs, gabapentin and relaxation therapy showed a mild to moderate effect on reducing hot flushes in women with a history of breast cancer.


This is the abstract of a Cochrane Review published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) 2012, issue 11, art. No. CD004923.DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004923.pub9 (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD004923.pub2/abstract?systemMessage=Wiley+Online+Library+will+be+disrupted+on+17+December+from+at+23%3A00+GMT+%2818%3A00+EST%29+for+essential+maintenanc e+for+approximately+one+hour). For full citation and authors details see reference 1

The full text is freely available, for Latin America and the Caribbean, from:http://cochrane.bvsalud.org/cochrane/show.php?db=reviews&mfn=2953&id=CD004923&lang=pt&dblang=&lib=COC&print=yes (this link may be temporary)

COMMENTS

In clinical practice, the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) presents good results with regard to hot flushes, and is especially effective in mild to moderate cases. They are considered to be a good alternative for women with histories of breast cancer.

Jarbas Magalhães, MD, PhD (Gynecology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas). Director of Gynecology at Personna Center of Gynecology and Woman's Health, Mogi-Mirim, São Paulo, Brazil.

REFERENCE

  • 1
    Rada G, Capurro D, Pantoja T, et al. Non-hormonal interventions for hot flushes in women with a history of breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(9):CD004923.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    Apr 2013
Associação Paulista de Medicina - APM APM / Publicações Científicas, Av. Brigadeiro Luís Antonio, 278 - 7º and., 01318-901 São Paulo SP - Brazil, Tel.: +55 11 3188-4310 / 3188-4311, Fax: +55 11 3188-4255 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: revistas@apm.org.br