Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Testing and modeling of a traditional timber mortise and tenon joint

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The structural safety and behaviour of traditional timber structures depends significantly on the performance of their connections. The behaviour of a traditional mortise and tenon timber joint is addressed using physical testing of full-scale specimens. New chestnut wood and old chestnut wood obtained from structural elements belonging to ancient buildings is used. In addition, the performance of different semi and non-destructive techniques for assessing global strength is also evaluated. For this purpose, ultrasonic testing, micro-drilling and surface penetration are considered, and the possibility of their application is discussed based on the application of simple linear regression models. Finally, nonlinear finite element analysis is used to better understand the behaviour observed in the full-scale experiments, in terms of failure mode and ultimate load. The results show that the ultrasonic pulse velocity through the joint provides a reasonable estimate for the effectiveness of the assembly between the rafter and brace and novel linear regressions are proposed. The failure mechanism and load–displacement diagrams observed in the experiments are well captured by the proposed non-linear finite element analysis, and the parameters that affect mostly the ultimate load of the timber joint are the compressive strength of wood perpendicular to the grain and the normal stiffness of the interface elements representing the contact between rafter and brace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aman R, West H, Cormier D (2008) An evaluation of loose tenon joint strength. For Prod J 58(3):61–64

    Google Scholar 

  2. Biechele T, Chui Y, Gong M (2010) Assessing stiffness on finger-jointed timber with different non-destructive testing techniques. In: Proceedings of the final conference of COST action E53

  3. Bouchoir A, Vergne A (1995) An application of the Tsai criterion as a plastic-flow law for timber bolted joint modeling. Wood Sci Technol 30(1):3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Branco J (2008) Influence of the joints stiffness in the monotonic and cyclic behaviour of traditional timber trusses. Assessment of the efficacy of different strengthening techniques. PhD thesis, University of Minho and University of Trento

  5. Branco J, Piazza M, Cruz PJS (2011) Experimental evaluation of different strengthening techniques of traditional timber connections. Eng Struct 33(8):2259–2270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. CEN (1991) EN 26891 - Timber structures. Joints made with mechanical fasteners general principles for the determination of strength and deformation characteristics. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  7. CEN (2003) EN 408 - Timber structures. Structural timber and glued laminated timber. Determination of some physical and mechanical properties. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chen C, Lee T, Jeng D (2003) Finite element modeling for the mechanical behavior of dowel-type timber joints. Comput Struct 81(30–31):2731–2738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Eckelman C, Akcay H, Haviarova E (2007) Exploratory study of truss heel joints constructed with round mortise and tenon joints. For Prod J 57(9):68–72

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eckelman C, Haviarova E (2008) Rectangular mortise and tenon semirigid joint connection factors. For Prod J 58(12):49–55

    Google Scholar 

  11. Feio A (2006) Inspection and diagnosis of historical timber structures: NDT correlations and structural behaviour, PhD Thesis, University of Minho, Portugal. Available from www.civil.uminho.pt/masonry

  12. Guan ZW, Rodd PD (2000) A three-dimensional finite element model for locally reinforced timber joints made with hollow dowel fasteners, Canadian. J Civil Eng 27(4):785–797

    Google Scholar 

  13. Haviarova E, Eckelman C (2009) Semi-rigid connection factors for small round mortise and tenon joints. For Prod J 59(9):55–60

    Google Scholar 

  14. Judd J, Fonseca F, Walker C, Thorley P (2012) Tensile strength of varied-angle mortise and tenon connections in timber frames. J Struct Eng 137(5):636–644

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kasal B, Tannert T (2010) In situ assessment of structural timber. RILEM state of the art reports

  16. Leijten A, Köhler J, Jorissen A (2004) Review of probability data for timber connections with dowel-type fasteners. In: Proceedings of the 37th meeting, international council for research and innovation in building and construction, working commission W18 - Timber structures, CIB-W18, Paper No. 37-7-13, Edinburgh, UK

  17. Likos E, Haviarova E, Eckelman C, Erdil Y, Ozcifci A (2012) Effect of tenon geometry, grain orientation, and shoulder on bending moment capacity and moment rotation characteristics of mortise and tenon joints. Wood Fiber Sci 44(4):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lourenço P, De Borst R, Rots J (1997) A plane stress softening plasticity model for orthotropic materials. Int J Numer Methods Eng 40:4033–4057

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Lourenço PB, Feio AO, Machado JS (2007) Chestnut wood in compression perpendicular to the grain: non-destructive correlations for test results in new and old wood. Constr Build Mater 21(8):1617–1627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Min K, Na Y, Qun C (2011) Studies on static performance of mortise and tenon joint in traditional column and tie construction timber structure. In: International conference on electric technology and civil engineering (ICETCE), pp 6197–6200

  21. Moses D, Prion H (2003) A three-dimensional model for bolted connections in wood. Can J Civ Eng 30(3):555–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Palma P, Cruz H (2007) Mechanical behaviour of traditional timber carpentry joints in service conditions - results of monotonic tests. In: From material to Structure – Mechanical behaviour and failures of the timber structures XVI international symposium, Venice, Italy. ICOMOS IWC

  23. Parisi M, Piazza M (2000) Mechanics of plain and retrofitted traditional timber connections. J Struct Eng 126(12):1395–1403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Parisi M, Piazza M (2002) Seismic behavior and retrofitting of joints in traditional timber roof structures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 22(9–12):1183–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ross R, Brashaw B, Pellerin R (1998) Nondestructive evaluation of wood. For Prod J 48(1):101–105

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sandberg LB, Bulleit WM, Reid EH (2000) Strength and stiffness of oak pegs in traditional timber-frame joints, J. Struct Eng ASCE 126(6):717–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Saporiti J, Palma P (2011) Non-destructive evaluation of the bending behaviour of in-service pine timber structural elements. Mater Struct 44(5):901–910

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sawata K, Yasumura M (2003) Estimation of yield and ultimate strengths of bolted timber joints by nonlinear analysis and yield theory. J Wood Sci 49(5):83–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Schmidt RJ, MacKay RB, Leu BL (1996) Design of joints in traditional timber frame buildings. In: Proceedings of the international wood engineering conference, New Orleans, LA, 28–31, vol 4, pp 240–247. Reprinted in—Timber frame joinery and design workbook, timber framers guild of North America, pp. 77–91

  30. Schmidt R, Scholl G (2000) Load duration and seasoning effects on mortise and tenon connections. Research Report, University of Wyoming, Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Wyoming

  31. Shanks J, Walker P (2009) Strength and stiffness of all-timber pegged connections. J Mater Civ Eng 21(1):10–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Stehn L, Borjes K (2004) The influence of nail ductility on the load capacity of a glulam truss structure. Eng Struct 26(6):809–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Villar JR, Guaita M, Vidal P, Arriaga F (2007) Analysis of the stress state at the cogging joint in timber structures. Biosyst Eng 96(1):79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Architecture, University Lusíada, Largo Tinoco de Sousa, 4760-108, Vila Nova de Famalicão, Portugal

    Artur O. Feio

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, ISISE, University of Minho, Azurém, 4800-058, Guimarães, Portugal

    Paulo B. Lourenço

  3. Timber Structures Division, National Laboratory for Civil Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal

    José S. Machado

Authors
  1. Artur O. Feio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paulo B. Lourenço
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. José S. Machado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Artur O. Feio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feio, A.O., Lourenço, P.B. & Machado, J.S. Testing and modeling of a traditional timber mortise and tenon joint. Mater Struct 47, 213–225 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-013-0056-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-013-0056-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation