Abstract
Bridge decks are commonly subjected to harsh environmental conditions that often lead to serious corrosion problems, which are triggered by blisters under the hot mix asphalt bridge deck pavement with waterproofing membranes. These blisters are secretly evolving during weather exposure until often being detected too late. Formation of blisters under the waterproofing membrane is caused by a complex mechanism governed by bottom–up pressure and loss of adhesion. This paper primarily intends to adopt the analytical blister propagation energy approach for waterproofing membranes and compare it with adhesive fracture energy from standard peeling test methods, already described in the literature. Three different types of polymer modified bitumen membranes (PBM) were used for this purpose. The investigation includes a comparison between uniaxial and biaxial testing conditions for determining the modulus of elasticity of the membranes. Moreover, the influence of the displacement rate and temperature on the adhesive fracture energy in peeling tests is investigated. It was found that the biaxial modulus of PBM in the longitudinal and transversal direction is comparable with the uniaxial tension testing results in the main directions. In addition, it was observed that the ratio of longitudinal and transversal modulus of elasticity was similar. The energy calculated from tests with elliptical blister propagation showed a comparable value to the standard peeling fracture energy for similar types of PBM.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hailesilassie BW, Partl MN (2012) Mechanisms of asphalt blistering on concrete bridges. J ASTM Int 9. doi:10.1520/JAI104135
Partl MN, Gubler R, Hean S (2001) Belagsschäden infolge Blasenbildung auf einer neuen Hängebrücke in Hongkong. In: Muster W, Schläpfer Herausgeber K (eds) Nachhaltige Material- und Systemtechnik. EMPA, Dübendorf, pp 337–343
Hean S, Partl MN (2006) Determination of the decisive factors influencing the behaviour of bridge waterproofing systems with polymer–bitumen membranes. Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications, Bern, p 597
Rosenberg J (2000) Thin pavements with synthetic binder used in Denmark. Asphalt De., Danish Road Institute, Roskilde
Hean S, Partl MN (2003) Mastic asphalt and waterproofing components for bridge and tunnel construction. Presented at the proceedings of 12th int. flexible pavements conference, Melbourne
Partl MN (2004) Deterioration mechanisms in polymer-modified bitumen’s water proofing membrane sheets during torching. Swiss Federal Laboratories for Material Science and Technology, Duebendorf, p 577
Architekten-Verein SI (1999) Prüfungen und anwendungsgebite polymerbitumen-dichtungsbahnen-schälzugprüfungen, vol SIA 281/2, SN 564 281/2, ed. Zurich
Architekten-Verein SI (1999) Bitumenhahnen-haftzugprüfung, vol SIA 281/3, SN 564 281/3, ed. Zurich
Galliot C, Luchsinger RH (2011) Uniaxial and biaxial mechanical properties of ETFE foils. Polym Test 30:356–365
Kinloch AJ, Lau CC, Williams JG (1994) The peeling of flexible laminates. Int J Fract 66:45–70
Moore DR, Williams JG (2001) Peel testing of flexible laminates. Fract Mech Test Methods Polym Adhes Compos 28:203–223
Blackman BRK, Hadvinia H, Kinloch AJ, Williams JG (2003) The use of a cohesive zone model to study the fracture of fiber composites and adhesively-bonded joints. Int J Fract 119:25–46
Hadavinia H, Kawashita L, Kinloch AJ, Moore DR, Williams JG (2006) A numerical analysis of the elastic–plastic peel test. Eng Fract Mech 73:2324–2335
Hailesilassie BW, Partl MN (2013) Adhesive blister propagation under an orthotropic bituminous waterproofing membrane. Constr Build Mater (accepted manuscript and under review in Elsevier Editorial system)
Georgiou I, Hadavinia H, Ivankovic A, Kinloch AJ, Tropsa V, Williams JG (2003) Cohesive zone models and the plastically deforming peel test. J Adhes 79:239–265
Williams JG, Hadavinia H (2001) Analytical solutions for cohesive zone models. J Mech Phys Solids 50:809–825
Fini EH, Al-Qadi IL (2011) Development of a pressurized blister test for interface characterization of aggregate highly polymerized bituminous materials. J Mater Civ Eng 23:656–663
Van Hemelrijck D, Ramault C, Makris A, Clarke A, Williamson C (2007) Biaxial testing of fiber reinforced composites. Presented at the 16th international conference on composite materials, Kyoto
Galliot C, Luchsinger RH (2009) A simple model describing the non-linear biaxial tensile behaviour of PVC-coated polyester fabrics for use in the finite element analysis. Compos Struct 90:438–447
Reese S, Raible T, Wriggers P (2001) Finite element modeling of orthotropic material behaviour in pneumatic membranes. Int J Solid Struct 38:9525–9544
Nase M, Lange B, Grellmann W (2008) Fracture mechanics on polyethylene/polybutene-1 peel films. Polym Test 27:1017–1025
Schweizer Norm (1999) Polymerbitumen-Dichtungsbahnen Schälzugprüfungen, vol 281/2, ed. swiss, Schweizerischer Ingenieur- und Architekten-Verein
Kim K-S, Aravas N (1988) Elastoplastic analysis of the peel test. Int J Solids Struct 24:417–438
Hohlfelder RJ (1999) Bulge and blister testing of the films and their interfaces. Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford
Kai-Tak W, Yiu-Wing M (1995) Fracture mechanics of a new blister test with stable crack growth. Acta Metall Mater 43:4109–4115
Robert JH, William DN, Huihong L, Christopher EDC (1999) Blister test analysis methods. Mater Res Soc Symp Proc 356:585–590
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledges the support of colleges Kienast Hans and Kato Hiroyuki, Road Engineering/Sealing Components, EMPA (Swiss Federal Laboratories for Material Science and Technology) including other group members of the Lab. and C. Galliot, Center for Synergetic Structures, EMPA, for his many interactions throughout the project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hailesilassie, B.W., Hean, S. & Partl, M.N. Testing of blister propagation and peeling of orthotropic bituminous waterproofing membranes. Mater Struct 48, 1095–1108 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-013-0217-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-013-0217-z