Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Thixotropy and interfacial bond strengths of polymer-modified printed mortars

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

3D concrete printing is an emerging construction technique for building structures layer-by-layer based on digital computer models without the need of formwork. The monitoring of interlayer bonding is crucial to ensure durability and structural integrity. This investigation aims at proposing a new methodology to assess the concurrent effects of material structural build-up (thixotropy), time gap between successive filaments, and incorporation of styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR) polymers on bond strengths of deposited layers. Four mortar series prepared with 450–750 kg/m3 binder and effective water-to-binder ratio of 0.35–0.55 are tested; the resulting thixotropy rate ranged from 0.16 to 1.1 Pa/s. Results showed that mixtures exhibiting moderate thixotropy levels (i.e., about 0.48–0.64 Pa/s) yielded the best performance regarding interfacial bonding. The incorporation of SBR proved efficient to enhance the bond strength as well as attenuate its rate of drop over the time gap between successive layers. This was related to the polymer films that coalesce in the cementitious system, thus binding the cement hydrates together and causing increased tensile strength properties. The bond strengths recorded on specimens exposed to hot temperature of 45 °C were consistently lower than those determined in standard curing conditions. The methodology proposed was successfully validated using 3D laboratory printing machine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tay YWD, Panda B, Paul SC, Mohamed NAN, Tan MJ, Leong KF (2017) 3D printing trends in building and construction industry: a review. Virtual Phys Prototyp 12(3):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Khoshnevis B (2004) Automated construction by contour crafting—related robotics and information technologies. Autom Constr 13:5–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2003.08.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Buswell RA, Leal de Silva WR, Jones SZ, Dirrenberger J (2018) 3D printing using concrete extrusion: a roadmap for research. Cem Concr Res 112:37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. De Schutter G, Lesage K, Mechtcherine V et al (2018) Vision of 3D printing with concrete—technical, economic and environmental potentials. Cem Concr Res 112:25–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Le TT, Austin SA, Lim S, Buswell RA, Gibb AGF, Thorpe T (2012) Mix design and fresh properties for high-performance printing concrete. Mater Struct 45:1221–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ma G, Li Z, Wang L (2018) Printable properties of cementitious material containing copper tailings for extrusion based 3D printing. Constr Build Mater 162:613–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kazemian A, Yuan X, Cochran E, Khoshnevis B (2017) Cementitious materials for construction-scale 3D printing: laboratory testing of fresh printing mixture. Constr Build Mater 145:639–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Malaeb Z, Al Sakka F, Hamzeh FR (2019) 3D concrete printing: machine design, mix proportioning, and mix comparison between different machine setups. In: Sanjayan JG, Nazari A, Nematollahi B (eds) 3D concrete printing technology. Elsevier, Amsterdam (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Feng P, Meng X, Chen J, Ye L (2015) Mechanical properties of structures 3D printed with cementitious powders. Constr Build Mater 93:486–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Khayat KH, Assaad J (2008) Use of thixotropy-enhancing agent to reduce formwork pressure exerted by self-consolidating concrete. ACI Mater J 105(1):88–96

    Google Scholar 

  11. Assaad J, Daou Y, Harb J (2014) Influence of thixotropy on performance of grouts placed using vacuum injection techniques. ACI Mater J 112(2):189–198. https://doi.org/10.14359/51686914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. El Sakka F, Senan MH, Abou Yassin A, Hamzeh FR (2018) Optimizing 3D printing path to minimize the formation of weak bonds. In: Skibniewski MJ, Hajdu M (eds) Proceedings of the creative construction conference, pp 181–188. https://doi.org/10.3311/ccc2018-024

  13. Le TT, Austin SA, Lim S, Buswell RA, Law R, Gibb AGF, Thorpe T (2012) Hardened properties of high-performance printing concrete. Cem Concr Res 42(3):558–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Panda B, Paul SC, Mohamed NAN, Tay YWD, Tan MJ (2018) Measurement of tensile bond strength of 3D printed geopolymer mortar. Measurement 113:108–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Roussel N, Ovarlez G, Garrault S, Brumaud C (2012) The origins of thixotropy of fresh cement pastes. Cem Concr Res 42:148–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Khayat KH, Omran AF, Naji S, Billberg P, Yahia A (2012) Field-oriented test methods to evaluate structural build-up at rest of flowable mortar and concrete. Mater Struct 45:1547–1564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Assaad J (2016) Correlating thixotropy of self-consolidating concrete to stability, formwork pressure, and multi-layers casting. J Mater Civil Eng 28(10):04016107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0001624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Perrot A, Rangeard D, Pierre A (2016) Structural built-up of cement-based materials used for 3D-printing extrusion techniques. Mater Struct 49:1213–1220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Roussel N, Cussigh F (2008) Distinct-layer casting of SCC: the mechanical consequences of thixotropy. Cem Concr Res 38(5):624–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Assaad J, Issa C (2016) Preliminary study on interfacial bond strength due to successive casting lifts of self-consolidating concrete—effect of thixotropy. Constr Build Mater 126:351–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zareiyan B, Khoshnevis B (2017) Effects of interlocking on interlayer adhesion and strength of structures in 3D printing of concrete. Autom Constr 83:212–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bos F, Wolfs R, Ahmed Z, Salet T (2016) Additive manufacturing of concrete in construction: potentials and challenges of 3D concrete printing. Virtual Phys Prototyp 11(3):209–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kaewunruen S, Wu L, Goto K, Najih YM (2018) Vulnerability of structural concrete to extreme climate variances. Climate 6(40):1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli6020040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tonoli GH, Santos SF, Savastano H Jr, Delvasto S, Meja de Gutierrez R, Lopez de Murphy M (2011) Effects of natural weathering on microstructure and mineral composition of cementitious roofing tiles reinforced with fique fibre. Cem Concr Compos 33:225–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bochen J (2015) Weathering effects on physical–chemical properties of external plaster mortars exposed to different environments. Constr Build Mater 79:192–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chew MYL (1999) Factors affecting ceramic tile adhesion for external cladding. Constr Build Mater 13:293–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ohama Y (1995) Handbook of polymer-modified concrete and mortars. Nihon University, Japan, p 245

    Google Scholar 

  28. Barluenga G, Olivares FH (2004) SBR latex modified mortar rheology and mechanical behaviour. Cem Concr Res 34:527–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ribeiro MSS, Goncalves AF, Branco FAB (2008) Styrene-butadiene polymer action on compressive and tensile strengths of cement mortars. Mater Struct 41:1263–1273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Issa C, Assaad JJ (2017) Stability and bond properties of polymer-modified self-consolidating concrete for repair applications. Mater Struct 50:28. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-016-0921-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Assaad JJ, Gerges N (2019) Styrene-butadiene rubber modified cementitious grouts for embedding anchors in humid environments. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 84:317–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.11.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mirza J, Mirza MS, Lapointe R (2002) Laboratory and field performance of polymer-modified cement-based repair mortars in cold climates. Constr Build Mater 16:365–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Assaad J, Khayat KH (2006) Effect of casting rate and concrete temperature on formwork pressure of self-consolidating concrete. Mater Struct 39(3):333–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11527-005-9042-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. ACI Committee 548 (2009) Guide for the use of polymers in concrete (ACI 548.1R-09). American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills

  35. Kuder KG, Shah SP (2007) Rheology of extruded cement-based materials. ACI Mater J 104(3):283–290

    Google Scholar 

  36. Perrot A, Lecompte T, Estelle P, Amziane S (2013) Structural build-up of rigid fiber reinforced cement-based materials. Mater Struct 46(9):1561–1568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Assaad J, Harb J, Maalouf Y (2014) Measurement of yield stress of cement pastes using the direct shear test. J NonNewton Fluid Mech 214:18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnnfm.2014.10.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Nerella VN, Beigh MAB, Fataei S, Mechtcherine V (2019) Strain-based approach for measuring structural build-up of cement pastes in the context of digital construction. Cem Concr Res 115:530–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Alfani R, Guerrini GL (2005) Rheological test methods for the characterisation of extrudable cement-based materials—a review. Mater Struct 38:239–247

    Google Scholar 

  40. Assaad J, Harb J, Maalouf Y (2016) Effect of vane configuration on yield stress measurements of cement pastes. J NonNewton Fluid Mech 230:31–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnnfm.2016.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. ASTM D3080/D3080 M-11 (2011) Standard test method for direct shear test of soils under consolidated drained conditions. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  42. BS EN 1542 (1999) Products and systems for the protection and repair of concrete structures. Test methods. Measurement of bond strength by pull-off

  43. Assaad J (2018) Development of polymer-modified cement for adhesive and repair applications. Constr Build Mater 163:139–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Steward PA, Hearn J, Wilkinson MC (2000) An overview of polymer latex film formation and properties. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 86:195–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Sanjayan JG, Nematollahi B, Xia M, Marchment T (2018) Effect of surface moisture on inter-layer strength of 3D printed concrete. Constr Build Mater 172:468–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.232

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the Civil and Environmental Engineering department at the American University of Beirut (Grant No. 103487), and by the Lebanese National Council for Scientific Research (CNRS) (Grant No. 103534). All findings and conclusions expressed in this paper are those of the authors, and do not reflect those of the contributors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon

    Fatima El Sakka & Farook R. Hamzeh

  2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Balamand, Koura, Lebanon

    Joseph J. Assaad & Charbel Nakhoul

Authors
  1. Fatima El Sakka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joseph J. Assaad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Farook R. Hamzeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Charbel Nakhoul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph J. Assaad.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sakka, F.E., Assaad, J.J., Hamzeh, F.R. et al. Thixotropy and interfacial bond strengths of polymer-modified printed mortars. Mater Struct 52, 79 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-019-1356-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-019-1356-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation