Skip to main content
Log in

Swarm intelligence for mixed-variable design optimization

  • Electrical Engineering
  • Published:
Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many engineering optimization problems frequently encounter continuous variables and discrete variables which adds considerably to the solution complexity. Very few of the existing methods can yield a globally optimal solution when the objective functions are non-convex and non-differentiable. This paper presents a hybrid swarm intelligence approach (HSIA) for solving these nonlinear optimization problems which contain integer, discrete, zero-one and continuous variables. HSIA provides an improvement in global search reliability in a mixed-variable space and converges steadily to a good solution. An approach to handle various kinds of variables and constraints is discussed. Comparison testing of several examples of mixed-variable optimization problems in the literature showed that the proposed approach is superior to current methods for finding the best solution, in terms of both solution quality and algorithm robustness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bonabeau, E., Dorigo, M., Theraulaz, G., 1999. Swarm Intelligence: from Natural to Artificial Systems. Oxford University Press.

  • Cao, Y.J., Wu, Q.H., 1997. Mechanical Design Optimization by Mixed-variable Evolutionary Programming. Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE Conference on Evoluionary Computation, IEEE Press, p.443–446.

  • Cao, Y.J., Jiang, L., Wu, Q.H., 2000. An evolutionary programming approach to mixed-variable optimization problems.International Journal of Applied Mathematical Modelling,24(10):931–942.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cha, J., Mayne, R., 1989. Optimization with discrete variables via recursive quadratic programming: part II.Transaction of the ASME,111:130–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J.L., Tsao, Y.C., 1993. Optimal design of machine elements using genetic algorithms.Journal of the Chinese Society of Mechanical Engineers,14:193–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coit, D.W., Smith, A.E., Tate, D.M., 1996. Adaptive penalty methods for genetic optimization of constrained combinatorial problems.INFORMS J. Computing,8: 173–182.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dorigo, M., Maniezzo, V., Colorni, A., 1996. The ant system: optimization by a colony of cooperating agents.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B,26:29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, J.F., Fenton, R.G., Cleghorn, W.L., 1991. A mixed ineger-discrete-continuous programming method and its application to engineering design optimization.Engineering Optimization,17:263–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajela, P., Shih, C., 1989. Multiobjective optimum design in mixed-integer and discrete design variable problems.AIAA Journal,28:670–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R., 1995. Particle Swarm Optimization. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, p.1942–1948.

  • Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R., Shi, Y., 2001, Swarm Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H.L., Chou, C.T., 1994. A global approach of nonlinear mixed discrete programming in design optimization.Engineering Optimization,22:109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, S.S., Zhang, C., Wang, H.P., 1995. On mixed-discrete nonlinear optimization problems: A comparative study.Engineering Optimization,23:287–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loh, H.T., Papalambros, P.Y., 1991a. A sequential linearization approach for solving mixed-discrete nonlinear design optimization problems.ASME Journal of Mechanical Design,113:325–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loh, H.T., Papalambros, P.Y., 1991b. Computational implementations and tests of a sequential linearization algorithm for mixed-discrete nonlinear design optimization problems.ASME Journal of Mechanical Design,113:335–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandgren, E., 1990. Nonlinear integer and discrete programming in mechanical design optimization.ASME Journal of Mechanical Design,112:223–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thierauf, G., Cai, J., 1997. Evolution Strategies-parallelization ad Application in Engineering Optimization.In: B.H.V. Topping (ed.), Parallel and Distributed Processing for Computational Mechanics. SaxeCoburg Publications, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H.F., Li, H., Chen, H., 2002. Power system voltage control by multiple STATCOMs based on learning humoral immune response.IEEE Proc. Part C,149: 301–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S.J., Chow, P.T., 1995. Genetic algorithms for nonlinear mixed discrete-integer optimization problems via meta-genetic parameter optimization.Engineering Optimization,24:137–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, C., Wang, H.P., 1993. Mixed-discrete nonlinear optimization with simulated annealing.Engineering Optimization,21:277–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 60074040, 6022506) and the Teaching and Research Award Program for Outstanding Young Teachers in Higher Education Institutions of China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guo, Cx., Hu, Js., Ye, B. et al. Swarm intelligence for mixed-variable design optimization. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A 5, 851–860 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2004.0851

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2004.0851

Key words

Document code

CLC number

Navigation