Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T17:24:55.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Authoring Ethnicized Subjects: Rigoberta Menchú and the Performative Production of the Subaltern Self

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Arturo Arias
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The debate over Rigoberta Menchú's testimonio has centered on whether or not Menchú told the “truth” regarding details of her personal life. According to her critics, her “lies” discredit her testimony and reduce the moral authority of leftist intellectuals who teach testimonial texts. This focus on verifiable facts ignores the literary value of testimonios in general and the importance of Menchú's testimony in particular in a discursive war tied to cold war politics. This essay explores the problematics of truth, the nature of testimonio as a genre, and the relation between political solidarity and subaltern narrative. It also examines the function of Menchú's testimonio as a discourse on ethnicity and considers the relation among the anthropologist, the subaltern subject, and truth. The conclusion deals with the need to rethink the concept of identity, with the desires and fantasies of subjective transformation, and with the notion of identity politics.

Type
Talks from the Convention
Information
PMLA , Volume 116 , Issue 1: Special Topic: Globalizing Literary Studies , January 2001 , pp. 75 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Arias, Arturo. “Changing Indian Identity: Guatemala's Violent Transition to Modernity.” Guatemalan Indians and the State, 1521-1988. Ed. Smith, Carol. Austin: U of Texas P, 1990. 230–57.Google Scholar
Arias, Arturo, ed. The Rigoberta Menchú Controversy. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2001.Google Scholar
Arias, Arturo, and Arriaza, Gilberto. “Claiming Collective Memory: Mayan Languages and Civil Rights.” Social Justice 25.3(1998): 70–79.Google Scholar
Beverley, John. Against Literature. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1993.Google Scholar
Bhabha, Homi. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Burgos-Debray, Elisabeth. I, Rigoberta Menchú: An Indian Woman in Guatemala. London: Verso, 1984.Google Scholar
Colom, Yolanda. Mujeres en la alborada. Guatemala: Artemis Edinter, 1998.Google Scholar
Earle, Duncan. “Menchú Tales and Maya Social Landscapes: The Silencing of Words and Worlds.” Arias, Rigoberta Menchú Controversy 288–308.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977. Ed. and trans. Gordon, Colin. New York: Pantheon, 1980.Google Scholar
Gugelberger, Georg M. “Institutionalization of Transgression.” Introduction. The Real Thing: Testimonial Discourse and Latin America. Ed. Gugelberger. Durham: Duke UP, 1996. 1–19.Google Scholar
Lovell, W. George, and Lutz, Christopher H. “The Primacy of Larger Truths: Rigoberta Menchú and the Tradition of Native Testimony in Guatemala.” Arias, Rigoberta Menchú Controversy 171–97.Google Scholar
Menchú, Rigoberta. “Rigoberta Menchú: Those Who Attack Me Humiliate the Victims.” With Juan Jesús Aznárez. Arias, Rigoberta Menchú Controversy 109–17.Google Scholar
Montejo, Victor. “Truth, Human Rights, and Representation: The Case of Rigoberta Menchú.” Arias, Rigoberta Menchú Controversy 372–91.Google Scholar
Moreiras, Alberto. “Pastiche Identity and Allegory of Allegory.” Latin American Identity and Constructions of Difference. Ed. Chanady, Amaryll. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1994. 204–38.Google Scholar
Payeras, Mario. Los fusiles de octubre. México: Pablos, 1991.Google Scholar
Porras, Gustavo. “Guatemala: La profundización de las relaciones capitalistas.” ECA 353 (1978): 374–406.Google Scholar
Proyecto Interdiocesano de Recuperación de la Memoria. Guatemala, nunca más: Informe. 4 vols. Guatemala: ODHAG, 1998.Google Scholar
Said, Edward. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon, 1978.Google Scholar
Sklodowska, Elzbieta. “La forma testimonial y la novelística de Miguel Barnet.” Revista/Review Interamericana 12 (1982): 375–84.Google Scholar
Sklodowska, Elzbieta. “The Poetics of Remembering, the Politics of Forgetting: Rereading I, Rigoberta Menchú.” Arias, Rigoberta Menchú Controversy 251–69.Google Scholar
Sommer, Doris. “Rigoberta's Secrets.” Latin American Perspectives 18 (1991): 32–50.10.1177/0094582X9101800303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Ed. Nelson, Cary and Grossberg, Larry. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 1988. 271–313.10.1007/978-1-349-19059-1_20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoll, David. “David Stoll Breaks the Silence.” Arias, Rigoberta Menchú Controversy 118–20.Google Scholar
Stoll, David. Rigoberta Menchú and the Story of All Poor Guatemalans. Boulder: Westview, 1998.Google Scholar
Stoll, David. “Stoll: I Don't Seek to Destroy Menchú.” With Dina García Fernández. Arias, Rigoberta Menchú Controversy 66–69.Google Scholar
Taracena, Arturo. “Arturo Taracena Breaks His Silence.” With Luis Aceituno. Arias, Rigoberta Menchú Controversey 82–94.Google Scholar
Žnižek, Slavoj. Gaze and Voice as Love Objects. Durham: Duke UP, 1996.Google Scholar