초록

This study suggests a class procedure which uses a movie to maximize interest and motivation to do writing. It also suggests a way in which learners can assess their own writing. Using a movie, a teacher leads students to expressing their views and opinions about a specific situation and context. In the first half of a 15 week semester, various writing skills and strategies were learned using a general writing text. In the second half, students expressed their opinions in an essay about a specific situation that showed logical development. A key part of this study is the assessment of the writing product. This study emphasizes that students need to focus on the story flow and logical construction while also considering context. A way of assessment is suggested with individual, pair and group activities that focus on three factors: context, organization and grammar. The factor students focus on is observed for a whole semester and how the focus shifts is checked from interviews and a questionnaire. This encourages students to be aware of the constituents of their essays. This awareness directly shows that the activity of writing is complementary to writing assessment.

키워드

English writing, movie, situation and context, assessment

참고문헌(44)open

  1. [학술지] 김소연 / 2010 / 동사(구) 자각력 형성을 통한 영화 활용 쓰기 학습에 대한 고찰 / 영상영어교육(STEM Journal) 11 (2) : 45 ~ 66

  2. [학술지] 김지은 / 2007 / 중학생 영작문 실력 향상을 위한 자동 문법 채점 시스템 구축 / 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지 7 (5) : 36 ~ 46

  3. [학술지] 송현영 / 2012 / 외국어고등학교 학생들의 영작문 오류 분석 / 영어학 12 (3) : 425 ~ 449

  4. [학술지] 오희정 / 2006 / 한국 대학생의 영작문에 나타난 모국어 간섭으로 인한 어휘구 오류 / 영어학 6 (2) : 399 ~ 416

  5. [학술지] 이광호 / 2011 / 의사소통능력 향상을 위한 영어 쓰기 지도법 / 언어학 연구 (19) : 169 ~ 192

  6. [학술지] 이준용 / 2009 / 영작문의 오류 분석 및 처리 / 새한영어영문학 51 (2) : 241 ~ 261

  7. [학술지] 이지연 / 2007 / 영어 교사들의 주관적 평가 방법에 따른 영작문 평가 시 평가항목의 타당도 / 응용언어학 23 (1) : 147 ~ 171

  8. [학술지] 이호 / 2005 / 영작문 평가 상황에서 학생들의 평가 과정에 대한 연구 / 영어교육연구 17 (3) : 215 ~ 234

  9. [학술지] 장혜진 / 2006 / 영화를 이용한 작문수업 활성화 방안: 스쿨오브락과 퀸카로 살아남는 법을 이용하여 / 영상영어교육(STEM Journal) 7 (1) : 71 ~ 94

  10. [학술지] 정상욱 / 2007 / 영화 속 미국 역사를 활용한 영어 쓰기 교재 개발 / 영상영어교육(STEM Journal) 8 (2) : 127 ~ 151

  11. [학술지] 정양수 / 2010 / 고등학생의 자유주제 영작문에서 나타난 오류분석 연구 / 현대영미어문학 28 (4) : 127 ~ 148

  12. [학술지] Berg, E. C. / 1999 / The effects of trained peer response on ESL students’ revision types and writing quality / Journal of Second Language Writing 8 : 215 ~ 241

  13. [단행본] Brown, H. D. / 2004 / Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices / Longman

  14. [단행본] Brown, H. D. / 2007 / Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy / Longman

  15. [학술지] Brown, J. D. / 1984 / A categorical instrument for scoring second language writing skills / Language Learning 34 (4) : 21 ~ 38

  16. [단행본] Byrne, D. / 1986 / Teaching oral English / Longman

  17. [학술지] Caulk, N. / 1994 / Comparing teacher and student responses to written work / TESOL Quarterly 28 : 181 ~ 188

  18. [학술지] Cynthia Daugherty / 2005 / Something to Write about: Movies as Materials for Beginning Academic Writing / 영상영어교육(STEM Journal) 6 (2) : 211 ~ 232

  19. [단행본] Ferris, D. R. / 2004 / Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and practice / Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

  20. [보고서] Frase, R. / 1999 / Computer analysis of the TOEFL test of written English

  21. [단행본] Griffin, D. / 2008 / The accidental husband [Motion picture] / Yari Film Group

  22. [보고서] Hale, G. / 1996 / A study of writing tasks assigned in academic degree programs

  23. [단행본] Hamp-Lyons, L. / 1991 / Assessing second language writing in academic contexts / Ablex : 5 ~ 15

  24. [단행본] Hamp-Lyons, L. / 1991 / Assessing second language writing in academic contexts / Ablex : 241 ~ 278

  25. [단행본] Jacobs, H. / 1981 / Testing ESL composition: A practical approach / Newbury House

  26. [학술지] 김재경 / 2009 / A Social Network Analysis of Weblogs in Collaborative College Writing / 영어교육 64 (2) : 77 ~ 102

  27. [학술지] Lee, Kyonglim / 2006 / The Effect of Genre-Based Instruction: Improving English Writing Ability in the Classroom / 영어교육 61 (1) : 257 ~ 281

  28. [학술지] Leki, I. / 1990 / Potential problems with peer responding in ESL classes / The CATESOL Journal 3 : 5 ~ 19

  29. [단행본] Lewis, M. / 1996 / Challenge and change in language teaching / MacMillan ELT : 10 ~ 17

  30. [보고서] Longford, N. T. / 1996 / Adjustment for reader rating behavior in the test of written English

  31. [학술지] Lumley, T. / 1995 / Rater characteristics and rater bias: Implications for training / Language Testing 12 : 54 ~ 71

  32. [보고서] Myford, C. M. / 1996 / Reader calibration and its potential role in equating for the test of written English

  33. [학술지] Nelson, G. L. / 1993 / Peer response groups: Do L2 writers use peer comments in revising their drafts? / TESOL Quarterly 27 : 135 ~ 142

  34. [단행본] Pavlik, C. / 2007 / Interactions 1: Writing / McGraw-Hill

  35. [단행본] Phillips, D. / 2001 / Longman introductory course for the TOEFL test / Pearson Education

  36. [단행본] Sakyi, A. A. / 2000 / Fairness and validation in language assessment / Cambridge University Press : 129 ~ 152

  37. [단행본] Schottman, E. / 1996 / Amazing English process writing portfolio program: Teacher’s handbook / Addison-Wesley

  38. [학술지] Shi, L. / 2001 / Native- and nonnative-speaking EFL teachers’ evaluation of Chinese students’ English writing / Language Testing 18 (3) : 303 ~ 325

  39. [단행본] Sokolik, M. / 2003 / Practical English language teaching / McGraw-Hill : 87 ~ 108

  40. [학술지] Song, B. / 1996 / Do English and ESL faculty differ in evaluating the essays of native English-speaking and ESL students? / Journal of Second Language Writing 5 : 163 ~ 182

  41. [학술지] Sweedler-Brown, C. O. / 1993 / ESL essay evaluation: The influence of sentence-level and rhetorical feature / Journal of Second Language Writing 2 : 3 ~ 17

  42. [학술지] Truscott, J. / 1996 / The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes / Language Learning 46 (2) : 327 ~ 369

  43. [단행본] Weigle, S. C. / 2002 / Assessing writing / Cambridge University Press

  44. [학술지] Zhu, W. / 1995 / Effects of training for peer response on students’ comments and interaction / Written Communication 12 : 492 ~ 528