초록

The majority of guarantees in support of international transactions are furnished in an indirect manner. The parties of such indirect guarantees include the applicant, the counterguarantee bank (first instructing bank), the guarantee bank (second issuing bank), and the beneficiary. The relationship between the applicant and the counter- guarantee bank has been labelled as one of mandate. The relationship between the counter- guarantee bank and the guarantee bank has also been labelled as one of mandate. If the complying documents are presented to the guarantee bank by the beneficiary, the guarantee bank must honour. There is no direct link between the counter-guarantor and the beneficiary. The consequence is that the beneficiary cannot make a presentation to the counter- guarantee bank, even where the guarantee bank wrongfully dis-honours its undertaking under the guarantee. However, where the applicable law so permits, the beneficiary may be entitled to claim damages from the counter- guarantee bank if the counter- guarantee bank’s conduct gives rise to a tortuous liability vis-a-vis the beneficiary. The guarantee bank engaging in indirect guarantees, due to its complexity, requires care consideration of various factors such as, extension due to unscheduled closure on expiry date and, automatic extension. The counter-guarantee bank is reminded that in the case of a counter-guarantee subject to URDG758 there is an indemnity for foreign laws and usages to the guarantee bank.

키워드

Counter-Guarantee, Independence Principle of Demand Guarantee, Indirect Guarantee

참고문헌(32)open

  1. [기타] Affaki, G. / 2011 / Guide to ICC Uniform Rules for Demand Guarantees URDG758 / International Chamber of Commerce

  2. [단행본] Bertrams, R. F. / 2013 / Bank Guarantees in International Trade / Kluwer Law International

  3. [단행본] Byrne, J. E. / 2014 / Standby & Demand Guarantee Practice / The Institute of International Banking Law & Practice

  4. [학술지] 채진익 / 2014 / 독립적 구상보증상의 지급청구와 그 사례 연구 / 무역학회지 39 (5) : 417 ~ 442

  5. [단행본] Ellinger, P. / 2010 / The Law and Practice of Documentary Letters of Credit / Hart Publishing

  6. [단행본] Enonchong, N. / 2011 / The Independence Principle of Letter of Credit and Demand Guarantees / Oxford University Press

  7. [학술지] Enonchong, N. / 2015 / The Law Applicable to Demand Guarantees and Counter-guarantees / Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly, May 19 : 4 ~ 215

  8. [학술지] 한재필 / 2008 / 독립적 보증에 있어 계약당사자간 법률관계에 관한 연구 -총론적 접근을 중심으로- / 무역학회지 33 (5) : 303 ~ 328

  9. [기타] ICC / 2014 / Rethinking Trade & Finance 2014 / ICC

  10. [학술지] Institute of International Baning Law & Practice / 2014 / Statistics US Banks / Documentary Credit World 18 (10) : 59 ~ 62

  11. [학술지] Jebamony, S. / 2015 / Practical Concerns and Considerations abound When Using Counter Undertakings / Documentary Credit World 19 (3) : 29 ~ 33

  12. [학술지] 김용길 / 2014 / 국제거래에서 독립적 보증의 당사자간 계약관계 / 무역보험연구 15 (2) : 215 ~ 239

  13. [단행본] Kurkela, M. S. / 2008 / Letter of Credit and Bank Guarantees under International Trade Law / Oxford University Press

  14. [학술지] 오원석 / 2010 / 국제거래에서 구상보증의 독립성의 제한 - 서울고등법원 2000나8863 판결 사례연구 - / 무역상무연구 47 : 157 ~ 182

  15. [기타] / 1983 / Banque de Paris et des Pays Bas v. SA Omnium Technique des Transport par Pipelines et Commercial Bank of Syria

  16. [기타] / 2007 / Banque Saudi Fransi v. Lear Siegler Inc / 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 47

  17. [기타] / 2006 / Banque Saudi Fransi v. Lear Siegler Service / 1 All ERC (Comm) 67

  18. [기타] / 2011 / British Arab Commercial Bank Plc v. Bank of Communications / EWHC 281(Comm); [2011] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 664

  19. [기타] / 2009 / CA Liege, 16 October 2007 / Revue Droit Commercial Belge

  20. [기타] / 1985 / Recueil Dalloz Sirey

  21. [기타] / 1995 / Cass, 29 March 1994 Recueil Dalloz Sirey

  22. [기타] / 1999 / Chartered Electronics Industries Pte Ltd v. Development Bank of Singapore / 4 SLR 655

  23. [기타] / 1978 / Edward Owen Engineering Ltd v. Barclays Bank International / 1 QB 159

  24. [기타] / 1985 / Esal (Commodities) Ltd v. Oriental Credit Ltd and Wells Fargo Bank NA / 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 546

  25. [기타] / 2010 / French Court of Cassation, Commercial Section / Eurocopter v. Banque Melli Iran, No. 09-12.701

  26. [기타] / 1994 / Gulf Bank KSC v. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd (No.2) / 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 145

  27. [기타] / 1990 / I.E. Contractors v. Lloyd’s Bank PLC and Rafidain Bank(CA) / 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 496

  28. [기타] / 2001 / Korean Seoul High Court Decision 2000Na8863

  29. [기타] / 2005 / Marubeni Hong Kong and South China Ltd. v. Government of Mongolia / 1 WRL 2497; 2005 2 Lloyd’s Rep 231

  30. [기타] / 1988 / Teib.com. Brussels / Journal des Tribunaux 1988 460

  31. [기타] / 1985 / United Trading Corp. SA v. Allied Arab Bank / 2 Lloyd’s Rep 554

  32. [기타] / 1996 / Wahda Bank v. Arab Bank / 1 Lloyd’s Rep 470