초록

The purpose of this study is to point out the improperness of the BAI's informations about the results after auditing and inspecting to the Ulsan Port Authority and Korea Container Terminal Authority. After auditing and inspecting to the Ulsan Port Authority and Korea Container Terminal Authority, the Board of Audit and Inspection of Korea(BAI) advised to the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs(MLTM) that you had better unify individual port authority than maintain present system because of government's expenditure reduction.. And MLTM request to the third party to examine the suitability of present system. At present, each port authority located in Busan, Incheon, Ulsan and Yoesu-Gwangyang port. Port authority is the most desirable port management and operating system under the fastly changing circumstances. Individual port authority could make a proper plan and carry out the most suitable policies for province or city surrounding the port authority. Furthermore port authority established in each port has many another good characteristics. For example, port authority takes a independent profit system and port committee including area's specialist having informations and interest about port and logistics. But the unified port authority could not do that like individual port authority. So it is difficult for individual port authority and the province and city concerned to accept the BAI's information. So MLTM have to decide prudently whether they unify the individual port authority or maintain the present system.

키워드

Port Authority, Unification of Port Authority, The Board of Audit and Inspection of Korea, Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs

참고문헌(26)open

  1. [보고서] 감사원 / 2009 / 감사결과 처분요구서-한국컨테이너부두공단 및 울산항만공사 기관운영감사

  2. [기타] / 2011 / 공감코리아 / 공감코리아

  3. [보고서] 국토해양부 / 2011 / 동향자료

  4. [기타] 국토해양부 / 2011 / 보도자료

  5. [학술지] 김종득 / 2011 / 동북아물류허브화에 따른 광주·전남지역 물류전문인력 양성에 관한 연구 / 무역연구 7 (1) : 389 ~ 409

  6. [보고서] 김형태 / 2000 / 지방자치단체의 항만관리능력 향상 방안

  7. [학술지] 박노경 / 2010 / 컨테이너항만의 경쟁력 측정방법:DEA와 퍼지평가법 접근 / 무역연구 6 (2) : 155 ~ 169

  8. [기타] 백성운 / 2008 / 부채 눈덩이, 컨테이너부두공단은 부도공단 / 백성운’s 보도자료

  9. [기타] / 2010 / 도쿄, 요코하마, 오사카 및 고베 통합항만을 추진하는 이유 / 쉬핑투데이

  10. [학술지] 이성우 / 2003 / 주요 외국 항만운영 형태와 우리나라 항만공사 발전방향 / 월간 해양수산

  11. [학위논문] 이언철 / 2011 / 중국 요녕성 주요 항만간 협력전략에 관한 연구

  12. [기타] / 2011 / 공공기관 선진화 공공기관 부실 가져와 / 조선일보

  13. [학술지] 최근배 / 2010 / 항만물류산업 분류에 관한 연구 / 무역연구 6 (3) : 253 ~ 276

  14. [단행본] 하명신 / 2011 / 항만물류의 이해 / 탑북스

  15. [기타] 한국조세연구원 / 2011 / 공공기관 선진화, 과거, 현재 그리고 미래

  16. [기타] / 감사원법

  17. [기타] / 공공기관의 운영에 관한 법률

  18. [기타] / 항만공사법

  19. [기타] / 항만법

  20. [기타] / 2011 / Containerization International March 2011

  21. [인터넷자료] / 로테르담항만공사 / 로테르담항만공사

  22. [인터넷자료] / 법제처

  23. [인터넷자료] / 부산항만공사

  24. [인터넷자료] / 여수광양항만공사

  25. [인터넷자료] / 울산항만공사

  26. [인터넷자료] / 인천항만공사