Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2011, 56(10):433-442 | DOI: 10.17221/3236-CJAS

Growth and survival rates, puberty and fecundity in captive common barbel (Barbus barbus L.) under controlled conditions

T. Policar, P. Podhorec, V. Stejskal, P. Kozák, V. ©vinger, S.M. Hadi Alavi
South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Vodňany, Czech Republic

Growth and survival rates (specific growth rate - SGR; survival rate - S) of Barbus barbus L. were recorded in captivity during three years from the larval period (final body weight - W = 0.2 ± 0.03 g; SGR = 13.6 ± 1.1%/day and cumulative survival - S = 76.0 ± 2.5%) to the first reproductive season (W = 62.55 ± 13.5 g; SGR = 0.89 ± 0.05%/day; S = 59.3 ± 1.5%). Final body size and SGR were compared between both sexes. Females reached the significantly higher growth rate (SGR = 0.84 ± 0.01%/day) compared to males (SGR = 0.77 ± 0.01%/day). Early puberty was observed in 17 and 32 months old males and females, respectively. Multi-stripping activity was found out in both sexes during the first reproductive season. In total, 20%, 25.8%, 30.3%, 14.6% and 9% of females were stripped once, twice and three, four and five times, respectively. But all males produced sperm during the entire reproductive season. The highest and the lowest egg production was recorded in the middle (April) and at the beginning (March) of the reproductive season (2155 ± 925 vs. 1279 ± 298 eggs per stripping). The highest and the lowest sperm production was observed at the beginning (March) and at the end (May) of the reproductive season (7.9 ± 0.08 × 109 vs. 1.9 ± 0.06 × 109 per stripping).

Keywords: Barbus barbus; stripping; egg; sperm; puberty; intensive culture

Published: October 31, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Policar T, Podhorec P, Stejskal V, Kozák P, ©vinger V, Hadi Alavi SM. Growth and survival rates, puberty and fecundity in captive common barbel (Barbus barbus L.) under controlled conditions. Czech J. Anim. Sci.. 2011;56(10):433-442. doi: 10.17221/3236-CJAS.
Download citation

References

  1. Alavi S.M.H., Pąenička M., Policar T., Linhart O. (2008a): Morphology and fine structure of Barbus barbus (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) spermatozoa. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 24, 378-381. Go to original source...
  2. Alavi S.M.H., Pąenička M., Rodina M., Policar T., Linhart O. (2008b): Changes of sperm morphology, volume, density and motility and seminal plasma composition in Barbus barbus (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) during the reproductive season. Aquatic Living Resources, 21, 75-180. Go to original source...
  3. Alavi S.M.H., Pąenička M., Policar T., Rodina M., Kozák P., Linhart O. (2008c): Sperm characteristics in Barbus barbus as a function of nutrition throughout the reproductive season. Cybium, 32, 200-201.
  4. Alavi S.M.H., Pąenička M., Policar T., Rodina M., Hamáčková J., Kozák P., Linhart O. (2009a): Sperm quality in male Barbus barbus L. fed different diets during the spawning season. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry, 35, 683-693. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Alavi S.M.H., Rodina M., Policar T., Linhart O. (2009b): Relationships between semen characteristics and body size in Barbus barbus L. (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) and effects of ions and osmolality on sperm motility. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, Part A, 153, 430-437. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Alavi S.M.H., Rodina M., Hatef A., Stejskal V., Policar T., Hamáčková J., Linhart O. (2010): Sperm motility and monthly variations of semen characteristics in Perca fluviatilis (Teleostei: Percidae). Czech Journal of Animal Science, 55, 174-182. Go to original source...
  7. Baras E., Philippart J.C. (1999): Adaptive and evolutionary significance of a reproductive thermal threshold in Barbus barbus. Journal of Fish Biology, 55, 354-375. Go to original source...
  8. Fiala J., Spurný P. (2001): Intensive rearing of the common barbel (Barbus barbus L.) larvae using dry starter feeds and natural diet under controlled conditions. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 7, 320-326.
  9. Hajirezaee S., Amiri B.M., Mirvaghefi A., Ahmadi A.S. (2010): Evaluation of semen quality of endangered Caspian brown trout (Salmo trutta caspius) in different times of spermiation during the spawning season. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 55, 445-455. Go to original source...
  10. Hamáčková J., Sedova M.A., Pjanova S.V., Lepičová A. (2001): The effect 2-Phenoxyethanol, clove oil and Propiscin anaesthetics on perch (Perca fluviatilis) in relation to water temperature. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 46, 469-473.
  11. Kestemont P., Cooremans J., Abi-Ayad S.M., Mélard C. (1999): Cathepsin L in eggs and larvae of Perch Perca fluviatilis: variations with developmental stage and spawning period. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry, 21, 59-64. Go to original source...
  12. Krupka I. (1988): Early development of the barbel (Barbus barbus (Linnaeus, 1758)). Práce Ústavu rybárstva a hydrobiologie, 6, 115-138. (in Czech)
  13. Kucharczyk D., Targonska K., Hliwa P., Gomulka P., Kwiatkowski M., Krejszeff S., Perkowski J. (2008): Reproductive parameters of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) spawners during natural season and out-ofseason spawning. Reproductive Biology, 8, 285-289. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Labatzki P., Fuhrmann B. (1992): Rearing barbel fingerlings (Barbus barbus L.). Fortschrift für Fischereiwissenschaft, 10, 69-73. (in German)
  15. Lefler K.K., Hegyi A., Baska F., Gál J., Horváth A., Urbányi B., Szabo T. (2008): Comparison of ovarian cycles of Hungarian riverine fish species representing different spawning strategies. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 53, 441-452. Go to original source...
  16. Lusk S. (1996): Development and status of populations of Barbus barbus in the waters of the Czech Republic. Folia Zoologica, 45, 39-46.
  17. Lusk S., Lusková V., Halačka K., ©lechta V., ©lechtová V. (1998): Trends and production of a fish communities of the barbel zone. Folia Zoologica, 47, 67-72.
  18. Lusk S., Hanel L., Lusková V. (2004): Red list of the ichthyofauna of the Czech Republic: Development and present status. Folia Zoologica, 53, 215-226.
  19. Malison J.A., Procarione L.S., Kayes T.B., Hansen J.F., Held J.A. (1998): Induction of out-of-season spawning in walleye (Stizostedion vitreum). Aquaculture, 163, 151-161. Go to original source...
  20. Migaud H., Gardeur J.N., Fordoxcel L., Fontaine P., Brun-Bellut J. (2001): Influence of the spawning time during the reproductive period on the larval quality of Eurasian perch Perca fluviatilis. In: Hendry C.I., Van Stappen G., Wille M., Sorgeloos P. (eds): Larvi 2001 - Fish & Shellfish Larviculture, Symp. European Aquaculture Society, Oostende, Denmark, 371- 374.
  21. Migaud H., Gardeur J.N., Kestemont P., Fontaine, P. (2004): Off-season spawning of Eurasian perch Perca fluviatilis. Aquaculture International, 12, 87-102. Go to original source...
  22. Peňáz M. (1971): Differences in mortality rate and development in feeding and starvating larva of Chondrostoma nasus and Barbus barbus (Pisces). Folia Zoologica, 20, 85-94.
  23. Peňáz M. (1973): Embryonic development of the barb, Barbus barbus (Linnaeus, 1758). Folia Zoologica, 22, 363-374.
  24. Petersson E., Järvi T. (1993): Differences in reproductive traits between sea-ranched and wild sea-trout (Salmo trutta) originating from a common stock. Nordic Journal of Freshwater Research, 68, 91-97.
  25. Philippart J.C. (1982): First experiments on controlled rearing of fry and fingerlings of the barbel Barbus barbus (L.) in Belgium. Perspectives for stocking into rivers. Cahiers d'Ethologie Appliquee, 2, 173-202. (in French)
  26. Philippart J.C., Mélard C. (1983): A first operation of restoring Belgian rivers with hatchery reared fry and fingerlings of the barbel, Barbus barbus, and the chub, Leuciscus leuciscus. Cahiers d'Ethologie Appliquee, 3, 223-230. (in French)
  27. Philippart J.C., Mélard C., Poncin P. (1989): Intensive culture of the common barbel, Barbus barbus (L.) for restocking. In: Pauw N. De., Jaspers E., Ackefors H., Wilkins N. (eds): Aquaculture - A Biotechnology in Progress. European Aquaculture Society, Bredene, 483-491.
  28. Policar T., Simon V., Kozák P. (2004): Egg incubation in the Noble crayfish (Astacus astacus L.): the effect of controlled laboratory and outdoor ambient condition on hatching success, growth and survival rate of juveniles. Bulletin Français de la Pęche et de la Pisciculture, 372-373, 411-423. Go to original source...
  29. Policar T., Kozák P., Hamáčková J., Lepičová A., Musil J., Kouřil J. (2007): Effects of short-time Artemia spp. feeding in larvae and different rearing environments in juveniles of common barbel (Barbus barbus) on their growth and survival under intensive controlled conditions. Aquatic Living Resources, 20, 175-183. Go to original source...
  30. Policar T., Toner D., Alavi S.M.H., Linhart O. (2008): Reproduction and Spawning. In: Rougeot C., Toner D. (eds): Farming of Eurasian Perch. Special Publication BIM 24, Dublin, Ireland, 22-29.
  31. Policar T., Podhorec P., Stejskal V., Hamáčková J., Alavi S.M.H. (2010): Fertilization and hatching rates and larval performance in captive common barbel (Barbus barbus L.) throughout the spawning season. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 26, 812-815. Go to original source...
  32. Poncin P. (1989): Effects of different photoperiods on the reproduction of the barbel, Barbus barbus (L.) reared at constant temperature. Journal of Fish Biology, 35, 395-400. Go to original source...
  33. Poncin P., Mélard C., Philippart J. (1987): Use of temperature and photoperiod in the control of the reproduction of 3 European cyprinids: Barbus barbus (L.) Leuciscus cephalus (L.) and Tinca tinca (L.), reared in captivity. Preliminary results. Bulletin Français de la Pęche et de la Pisciculture, 304, 1-12. (in French) Go to original source...
  34. Poncin P., Thiry M., Lepoint A., Philippart J. C. (1996): Histological and biometrical study of intraovarian oocytes in barbel (Barbus barbus) reared in captivity. Folia Zoologica, 45, 117-121.
  35. Prokeą M., ©ovčík P., Peňáz M., Baruą V., Spurný P. (2006): Growth of barbel, Barbus barbus, in the River Jihlava following major habitat alteration and estimated by two methods. Folia Zoologica, 55, 86-96.
  36. Wang N., Gardeur J.N., Henrotte E., Marie M., Kestemont P., Fontaine P. (2006): Determinism of the induction of the reproductive cycle in female Eurasian Perch, Perca fluviatilis: effects of environmental cues and modulating factors. Aquaculture, 261, 706-714. Go to original source...
  37. Wolnicki J., Górny W. (1995): Survival and growth of larval and juvenile barbel (Barbus barbus L.) reared under controlled conditions. Aquaculture, 129, 258-259. Go to original source...
  38. Wolnicki J., Sikorska J., Kamiński R. (2009): Response of larval and juvenile rudd Scardinius erythrophthalmus (L.) to different diets under controlled conditions. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 54, 331-337. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.