초록

Real estate such as land and buildings is indispensable for human beings to live. Moreover under the circumstances that land area is limited, the majority of the people are concentrated in big cities, we must note the point that the value of using is greater than the value of ownership. In other words, real estate constitutes the foundation of the lessee’ lives and in this sense, real estate lease ensuring the use of real estate in modern society has a vital significance. However, when the lease was terminated, the lessee should restore possession to the owner. If the lessee does not cooperate in restoration of possession, the lessor shall have the remedies. These Remedies greatly can be divided into two ways: public and private remedy. But the public remedy such as trial procedure cause waste of time and money to the lessor, so it may be insufficient to protect the rights of the lessor side. Therefore, in order to make the effective protection of the rights of property owners, self-help as a way to private remedy should be recognized. Historically, self-help has been regarded as the recourse for injured parties when no courts are available that will accept jurisdiction. So, judicial precedent and most scholars often place stricter limits on repossession of certain rights and on eviction of lessee. And in some cases, the lessor who resort to self help in such situations are prone to tort liability. Therefore, this article will be reviewed against specific requirements of validity on self-help. Also, considering the particularities of real estate lease, the necessity of self-help have reviewed to evaluate.

키워드

부동산 임대차(Real Estate Lease), 자력구제(Self-help), 긴급성(Urgency), 특단의 사정(Extraordinary Circumstance), 차임연체(Rent in Arrears), 출입특약(Special Agreement for Entry)

참고문헌(24)open

  1. [단행본] 강태성 / 2009 / 물권법 / 대명출판사

  2. [단행본] 곽윤직 / 2002 / 물권법 / 박영사

  3. [단행본] 권용우 / 2000 / 물권법 / 법문사

  4. [단행본] 김상용 / 2000 / 물권법 / 법문사

  5. [단행본] 김용한 / 1993 / 물권법론 / 박영사

  6. [단행본] 곽윤직 / 2004 / 민법총칙 / 박영사

  7. [단행본] 김증한 / 1995 / 민법총칙 / 박영사

  8. [단행본] 김형배 / 2010 / 민법학강의 / 신조사

  9. [단행본] 이영준 / 2007 / 민법총칙 / 박영사

  10. [단행본] 이영준 / 2004 / 한국민법론(물권법) / 박영사

  11. [단행본] 장경학 / 1995 / 민법총칙 / 법문사

  12. [학술지] 조성민 / 1995 / 긴급성 없는 자력구제의 認否 / 고시계 40 (9)

  13. [단행본] 최병조 / 1992 / 민법주해IV 물권(1) / 박영사

  14. [단행본] 현승종 / 2001 / 게르만법 / 박영사

  15. [단행본] 황적인 / 1994 / 주석민법II 물권법 / 법원사

  16. [단행본] 明石三郞 / 1961 / 自力救濟の 硏究 / 有斐閣

  17. [단행본] 舟橋諄一 / 1960 / 物權法 / 有斐閣

  18. [단행본] 板橋郁夫 / 1975 / 物權法 / 成文堂

  19. [단행본] 我妻榮 / 1986 / 物權法 / 岩波書店

  20. [단행본] 鈴木祿弥 / 2007 / 物權法講義 / 創文社

  21. [학술지] 道垣内弘人 / 2000 / 自救行為 / 月刊法学教室 (234)

  22. [학술지] 田中嗣久 / 2007 / 不動産賃貸をめぐる, いわゆる‘自力救濟’の問題について / 大阪經濟法科大學論集 92

  23. [학술지] 森田果 / 2008 / 不動産賃貸借における立入特約の有效性 / ジュリスト (1361)

  24. [단행본] Munchener Kommentar zum Burgerlichen Gesetzbuch / 1981 / Sachenrecht, Bd4 / C H Beck; M nchen