초록

Police officers’ testimony in court is expected to increase drastically due to enforcement of trial-oriented court proceeding, expanded implementation of court proceedings with laymen’s participation, introduction of investigators’ testimony system, etc. Under such circumstances, status of court testimony by police officers could be identified through a questionnaire survey conducted with police officers in the national police agency, where several problems were exposed as well. First, police officers did not have sufficient experience in the court testimony,and task burdens by police were expected to increase with an increase in the court testimony. Also lack of systematic instruction on the court testimony was also revealed as a problem, while no unified measures were shown to be available on recollection of memories related to the incident for a testimony. As improvement measures to resolve these problems,First, specialized instructions in relation to the court testimony were suggested to be implemented. It was emphasized that broad and systematic instructions should be directed to basic matters such as preparation for the court testimony, anticipated questions, required testimonial techniques, methods of memory recollection, legal knowledge such as perjury, etc. For instruction method, it was pointed out not be limited to one-time training but needs to be on a constant and regular basis taking into account such things as personnel transfer, recruitment of new officers, changes in regulations, etc. Secondly, needs for systematically managing police officers’ court testimony were discussed, with a statement that designation of a devoted department, provision of legal services through operation of specialized counselors, etc. were needed. Thirdly, it was suggested that police officers’ task loads were to be reduced through prior task discussions with the court and the prosecutors’ office having direct relations with police officers’ court testimony and that matters required for smooth testimony should be adjusted.

키워드

Court Testimony by Police Officers(경찰관 법정증언), Court Proceedings with Laymen’s Participation(국민참여재판), Investigator’s Testimony System(조사자증언제도), Trial-oriented Court Proceeding(공판중심주의)

참고문헌(21)open

  1. [단행본] 신동운 / 2011 / 신형사소송법 제3판 / 법문사

  2. [단행본] 신동운 / 2009 / 신형사소송법 제2판 / 법문사

  3. [단행본] 경찰청 / 2006 / 경찰관 법정증언 매뉴얼, In 기본(전문)매뉴얼 제71호

  4. [기타] 경찰청 / 2011 / 경찰백서

  5. [기타] 법무부 / 2007 / 개정 형사소송법

  6. [기타] 경찰청 수사국 / 2008 / 범죄분석

  7. [학술지] 김태명 / 2007 / 개정 형사소송법과 국민참여재판제도의 시행에 따른 경찰수사의 변화방향 / 형사정책연구 18 (3) : 811 ~ 838

  8. [기타] 구승모 / 2009 / 미국 공판정에서의 조사자 증언 활용 실무 / 해외연수검사논문

  9. [학술지] 나영민 / 2006 / 공판중심주의와 이에 따른 경찰수사의 대응방향 / 수사연구 (277)

  10. [학술지] 류장만 / 2008 / 조사자 증언 제도 연구 - 미국 실태를 중심으로 - / 법조 57 (5) : 293 ~ 350

  11. [학술지] 박종렬 / 2009 / 조사자 증언제도에 대한 고찰 / 법학연구 (36) : 289 ~ 305

  12. [학술지] 변필건 / 2009 / 조사 경찰관에 의한 전문진술의 현출방법에 관한 비교법적고찰 / 형사법의 신동향

  13. [학술지] 이동희 / 2007 / 배심제？공판중심주의에 따른 경찰활동의 변화방향 / 형사법연구 19 (3-하) : 735 ~ 754

  14. [학위논문] 이영돈 / 2011 / 경찰수사단계에서 체포된 피의자의 법적 지위에 관한 연구 : 영국 PACE(경찰과 형사증거법)와 비교를 중심으로

  15. [학술지] 최응렬 / 2009 / 국민참여재판 법정증언에 대비한 조사경찰관 역할의 변화 방향* / 한국공안행정학회보 18 (3) : 381 ~ 412

  16. [학술지] 홍승희 / 2004 / 공판중심주의적 법정심리절차가 수사절차에 미치는 영향 / 수사연구

  17. [단행본] 한상훈 / 2010 / 사개추위의 ｢국민의 형사재판 참여에 관한 법률｣ 성안시 쟁점과 결론, In 국민의 사법참여 / 경인문화사

  18. [학술지] 한인섭 / 2006 / 국민참여재판 하에서 경찰 역할의 변화 / 형사정책 18 (2) : 525 ~ 558

  19. [보고서] 한인섭 / 2008 / 경찰관 법정증언제도에 대한 연구

  20. [단행본] Kevin Tierney / 1970 / The courtroom testimony : A Policeman’s Guide / funk & Wagnalls

  21. [단행본] Don Lewis / 2001 / the Police Officer in the Courtroom / Thomas