Paper Status Tracking
Contact us
[email protected]
Click here to send a message to me 3275638434
Paper Publishing WeChat

Article
Affiliation(s)

University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China

ABSTRACT

With the rapid development of social media, emojis have gradually become an indispensable communication tool in computer-mediated communication (CMC). In recent years, researchers have found that emojis not only have semantic and syntax functions (e.g., punctuation), but also perform pragmatic functions. Therefore, this thesis is to investigate the differences in pragmatic functions of “smile” emoji between people of different ages. And this paper is a small-scale quantitative research based on the eight pragmatic functions of emoticons proposed by Yus (2014). To find out similarities and differences of “smile” emoji between people of different ages, this paper compared the use frequency and pragmatic functions of “smile” emoji in two WeChat groups which are from youth and middle-aged people and did statistical analysis by Statistic Package for Social Science (SPSS). According to similarities and differences in frequency and pragmatic functions, “smile” emoji can be divided into four categories, which are: (1) similar frequency but different functions; (2) different frequency but similar function, (3) emojis exist only in one group; and (4) similar in both use frequency and function. So, the results suggest that there is a difference between people of different ages using “smile” emoji in WeChat communication. Thus, this study will provide insights into how to use emojis in WeChat when people at different ages communicate with each other can make a successful conversation.

KEYWORDS

smile emoji, pragmatic functions, frequency, WeChat communication

Cite this paper

Sino-US English Teaching, August 2021, Vol. 18, No. 8, 207-215 doi:10.17265/1539-8072/2021.08.001

References

Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Darics, E. (2012). Instant message in work-based virtual teams: The analysis of non-verbal communication used for the contextualization of transactional and relational communicative goals. Retrieved from http://erika.darics.co/download/darics_phd.pdf

Diane, F. Witmer & Sandra Lee Katzman. (1997). On-line smiles: Does gender make a difference in the use of graphic accents? Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2(4), 1083-6101.

Dresner, E., & Herring, C. (2010). Functions of the nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and illocutionary force. Communication Theory, 20(3), 1468-2885.

Ge, J., & Herring, S. C. (2018). Communicative functions of emoji sequences on Sina Weibo. First Monday, 23(11). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i11.9413

Gibson, W., Huang, P. P., & Yu, Q. Y. (2018). Emoji and communicative action: The semiotics, sequence and gestural actions of “face covering hand”. Discourse, Context & Media, 26, 91-99.

Glenn, P. (2003). Laughter in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.

Holt, E. (2013). Conversation analysis and laughter. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedic of applied linguistics (pp. 1033-1038). Chichester: Blackwell.

Ikeda, K., & Bysouth, D. (2013). Laughter and turn-taking: Warranting next speakership in multiparty interaction. In P. Glenn and E. Holt (Eds.), Studies in laughter in interaction (pp. 39-64). London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Kavanagh, B. (2010). A cross-cultural analysis of Japanese and Chinese non-verbal online blogging communities. Language & Communication, 48, 53-65.

Li, L., & Yang, Y. (2018). Pragmatic functions of emoji in internet-based communication-a corpus-based study. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 3(16). Retrieved from https://sfleducation.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40862-018-0057-z

Luor, T., Wu, L. L., Lu, H. P., & Tao, Y. H. (2010). The effect of emoticons in simplex and complex task-oriented communication: An empirical study of instant messaging. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 889-895.

McKay, I. (2020). Some distributional patterns in the use of typed laughter-derived expressions on Twitter. Journal of Pragmatics, 166(4), 97-113.

Provine, R. R., Spencer, R. J., & Mandell, D. L. (2007). Emotional expression online Emoticons punctuate website text messages. Language Social Psychol, 26(3), 299-307.

Rezabek, L. L., & Cochenour, J. J. (1998). Visual cues inn computer-mediated communication: Supplementing text with emoticons. Journal of Visual Literacy, 18(2), 201-215.

Sampietro, A. (2019). Emoji and rapport management in Spanish WhatsApp chats. Journal of Pragmatics, 143(4), 109-120. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.009

Tossell, C. C., Kortum, P., Shepard, C., & Barg-Walkow, L. H. (2012). A longitudinal study of emoticon uses in text messaging from smartphones. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 659-663.

Yus, F. (2014). Not all emoticons are created equal. Linguagemem (Dis)curso, 14(3). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4017-140304-0414

About | Terms & Conditions | Issue | Privacy | Contact us
Copyright © 2001 - David Publishing Company All rights reserved, www.davidpublisher.com
3 Germay Dr., Unit 4 #4651, Wilmington DE 19804; Tel: 1-323-984-7526; Email: [email protected]