국가기간산업에 대한 인수합병시국가안보 심사 규제 방향

@article{ART001404328},
author={ 윤성승 },
title={국가기간산업에 대한 인수합병시국가안보 심사 규제 방향},
journal={법과정책연구},
issn={1598-5210},
year={2009},
volume={9},
number={2},
pages={1001-1016},
doi={10.17926/kaolp.2009.9.2.1001},
url={http://dx.doi.org/10.17926/kaolp.2009.9.2.1001}

TY - JOUR
AU - 윤성승
TI - 국가기간산업에 대한 인수합병시국가안보 심사 규제 방향
T2 - 법과정책연구
PY - 2009
VL - 9
IS - 2
PB - 한국법정책학회
SP - 1001-1016
SN - 1598-5210
AB - When mergers and acquisitions of the companies having national security sensitive technology were occurred by the foreign companies, national security reviews are necessary to protect national security interest. The United States enacted Exon-Florio amendment to give the U.S. president the authority of such national security review. However, the U.S. government exercised such review authority using case by case review approach to balance the encouragement of foreign investment and the protection of national security. It did not abuse the power only to protect domestic companies from mergers and acquisitions by the foreign companies. Korea has similar national security reviews in The Act for the Promotion of Investment by Foreigner and Telecommunication Business Act. National security reviews in Korea must not be used just as defenses against hostile take over by the foreign companies. Instead, it must be used to protect national security. Moreover, the industry specific national security reviews are more desirable than the general national security reviews since they can use industry specific expertise to evaluate the national security issues. The scope of national security review must be confined to the national security sensitive industry and companies. Expending national security review to all the large foreign investments regardless of the characters of the industry is not desirable. The committees, which are in charge of national security review, also need to propose reasonable conditions to be attached to the foreign investment instead of disapproving the investment or ordering divesture of the acquisition when they found foreign investment could be threat to national security.
KW - 국가안보 심사, 인수합병, 공익성 심사, 외국인투자, 엑슨-플로리어법
DO - 10.17926/kaolp.2009.9.2.1001
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.17926/kaolp.2009.9.2.1001
ER -

윤성승 (2009). 국가기간산업에 대한 인수합병시국가안보 심사 규제 방향. 법과정책연구, 9( 2), 1001- 1016.

윤성승 . 2009, “국가기간산업에 대한 인수합병시국가안보 심사 규제 방향”, 법과정책연구, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1001-1016. Available from: doi:10.17926/kaolp.2009.9.2.1001

윤성승 “국가기간산업에 대한 인수합병시국가안보 심사 규제 방향” 법과정책연구 9.2 pp. 1001-1016 (2009): 1001.

윤성승 . 국가기간산업에 대한 인수합병시국가안보 심사 규제 방향 법과정책연구 [Internet]. 2009; 9( 2), : 1001-1016. Available from: doi:10.17926/kaolp.2009.9.2.1001

윤성승 . “국가기간산업에 대한 인수합병시국가안보 심사 규제 방향” 법과정책연구 9, no.2 (2009): 1001-1016. doi: 10.17926/kaolp.2009.9.2.1001

홈 권호 목록 논문 목록 논문 상세

국가기간산업에 대한 인수합병시국가안보 심사 규제 방향

법과정책연구

약어 : -

2009, vol.9, no.2, pp.1001 - 1016

DOI : 10.17926/kaolp.2009.9.2.1001

발행기관 : 한국법정책학회

연구분야 : 법학

윤성승¹

¹아주대학교

인용한 논문 수 : - 서지 간략 보기

초록

When mergers and acquisitions of the companies having national security sensitive technology were occurred by the foreign companies, national security reviews are necessary to protect national security interest. The United States enacted Exon-Florio amendment to give the U.S. president the authority of such national security review. However, the U.S. government exercised such review authority using case by case review approach to balance the encouragement of foreign investment and the protection of national security. It did not abuse the power only to protect domestic companies from mergers and acquisitions by the foreign companies. Korea has similar national security reviews in The Act for the Promotion of Investment by Foreigner and Telecommunication Business Act. National security reviews in Korea must not be used just as defenses against hostile take over by the foreign companies. Instead, it must be used to protect national security. Moreover, the industry specific national security reviews are more desirable than the general national security reviews since they can use industry specific expertise to evaluate the national security issues. The scope of national security review must be confined to the national security sensitive industry and companies. Expending national security review to all the large foreign investments regardless of the characters of the industry is not desirable. The committees, which are in charge of national security review, also need to propose reasonable conditions to be attached to the foreign investment instead of disapproving the investment or ordering divesture of the acquisition when they found foreign investment could be threat to national security.

키워드

국가안보 심사, 인수합병, 공익성 심사, 외국인투자, 엑슨-플로리어법

참고문헌(11)

[학술지] 구대환 / 2007 / 산업기술유출방지법 제정의 의미와 보호대상에 대한 고찰 / 창작과 권리 48 : 64 ~ 91
[학술지] 김민배 / 2007 / 산업기술의 유출방지 및 보호에 관한 법률과 쟁점 / 산업재산권 (23) : 1 ~ 36
[기타] 김준동 / 2001 / 주요국 서비스업 시장개방 현황과 WTO 뉴 라운드 서비스 협상: 통신, 환경, 에너지 서비스를 중심으로 / 대외경제정책연구원
[단행본] 최승재 / 2009 / 국가기간산업에서의 기업인수․ 합병에 대한 규제 / 국민대학교
[학술지] 최승재 / 2006 / 한국판 ‘엑슨-플로리어법’제정에 대한 연구 - 입법론을 중심으로 / 증권법연구 7 (2) : 311 ~ 363
[기타] David A. Menard / 2002 / The Flexibility of Exon-Floria Amendment and the Expansion of Telecommunications into the Global Economy / Pub. Cont. L. J : 313 ~ 314
[기타] Jim Mendenhall / 1991 / United States: Executive Authority to Divest Acquisitions under the Exon-Florio Amendment-the MAMCO Divesture / Harv. Int'l L.J : 286
[기타] Joseph Mamounas / 2007 / Controling Foreign Ownership of U.S. Strategic Assets: The Challenge of Maintaining National Security in a Globalized and Oil Dependent World
[기타] Matthew R. Byrne / 2006 / Protecting National Security and Promoting Foreign Investment: Maintaining the Exon-Florio Balance / Ohio St. L.J. : 849
[기타] Patrick L. Schmidt / 1993 / The Exon-Florio Statute: How It Affects Foreign Investors and Lenders in the United States / 27 Int'l Law
[기타] Regulations Pertaining to Mergers / 1991 / Acquisitions, and Takeovers by Foreign Persons / Fed. Reg. 58774