Induced Physical Mutagenesis and its Effect in Cytological Behavior of Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal)

Article Preview

Abstract:

The mitotic effect of physical mutagen gamma rays was observed in the root tip cells of Ashwagandha. The Chromosome analysis has been showed as an important tool for establish variability of the plant seed by use of physical mutagen gamma rays. The gamma rays have of low wavelength and high penetrable power. The plant has tremendous medicinal values and it is known from ancient times. The dry and well matured seeds of ashwagandha were irradiated with different doses of gamma rays viz., 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45 and 50 KR respectively. The chromosome number of control plant is 2n = 48. The gamma rays affect the normal cytological behavior of ashwagandha species. The chromosomal aberrations increase with increase in the doses of gamma rays to optimum level of 30KR, because it causes changes in the chromosome structure, cellular structure and metabolism of plants. The chromosome aberration like, Sticky metaphase, Precocious moment chromosome, Fragments, Anaphasic bridge, Anaphasic laggard, Telophasic laggard. The present investigation was carried out to study the cytogenetic analysis of the species Withania somnifera. The chromosomal aberration increases with increase in the doses to optimum level (50 KR) of physical mutagen gamma rays.

Info:

Pages:

152-161

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Agarwal R., Ansari M. Y. K., J. Cytol. Genet. 2 (2001) 129-134.

Google Scholar

[2] Ahmed S., Yasmin R., Cytologia 57 (1992) 155-160.

Google Scholar

[3] Bandyopadhyay B., Bose S., 48 (1983) 13-19.

Google Scholar

[4] Baquar S.R., S. Akhtar, A. Hussain, Botaniska Notiser 118 (1965) 289-298.

Google Scholar

[5] Bhandari M.M. (1990). Flora of the Indian Desert, Scientific publishers, Jodhpur.

Google Scholar

[6] Bharathi T., Gnanamurthy S., Dhanavel D., International Journal of Advanced Research 1(5) (2013) 136-141

Google Scholar

[7] Bipasa C., Shella S., Mutat. res. 283 (1992) 287-294.

Google Scholar

[8] Bir S., M. Sidhu (1980). Cytological Observations on Weed Flora of Patiala District, Punjab," In: S.S. Bir, Eds., Recent Researches in plant science; Kalyani publishers, Ludhiana, 261-271.

Google Scholar

[9] Blinks L. R., J. cellcomp. Physiol. 39 (1952) 11.

Google Scholar

[10] Cequea H., Cequea D., Imery J., Nirichio M., Cytologia 68 (2003) 329-333.

DOI: 10.1508/cytologia.68.329

Google Scholar

[11] Chatha G. S., S. S. Bir, Plant sciences. 9 (1998) 199-256.

Google Scholar

[12] Chevallier A. (1996). The Encyclopedia of Medicinal plants, Dorling Kindersley, London.

Google Scholar

[13] Chidambaram A., Sundaramoorthy P., Murugan A., Sankar Ganesh K., Baskaran L., Iran J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 6 (1) (2008) 17-22.

Google Scholar

[14] Das A., Datta A. K, Ghose S., J Trop Med Plants 10 (2009) 249-256.

Google Scholar

[15] Das A., Datta A. K., Ghose S., Bhattacharyya A., J. Trop. Med. Pl. 10 (2009) 225-230.

Google Scholar

[16] Dhamayanthi K. P. M., Reddy V. R. K., Cytologia 65 (2000) 129-133.

Google Scholar

[17] Dhanavel D., S. Gnanamurthy, M. Girija., Int. J. Curr. Sci. (2012) 245-250.

Google Scholar

[18] Elangovan M., Selvaraj R., 25-26th, Feb, 1995. In: proc. symp. On Frontiers in Biodiversity, Madras, India, Abstract No. 16.

Google Scholar

[19] Gunkel J. E., Sparrow A. H., Brookhaven Symp. Biol. 6 (1954) 252-277.

Google Scholar

[20] Gupta A. P., Verma R. K., Misra H. O., Gupta M. M., J. Medi. Aro. Plant Sci. 18 (1996) 788-790.

Google Scholar

[21] Iqbal M., Datta A. K., J. Trop. Med. Pl. 8 (2007) 47-53.

Google Scholar

[22] Iqbal M., Datta A. K., Cytologia 72 (2007) 43-47.

Google Scholar

[23] Kaul K. N. (1957). The Orign, Distribution and Cultivation and cultivation of Ashwagantha the so called Withania somnifera of Indian Literature," Symposium on the Utilization of Indian Medicinal plants, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi, 7-8.

Google Scholar

[24] Khan Z., Gupta H, Ansari M. Y. K., Choudry S., Biol and Med. 1(2) (2009) 66-69.

Google Scholar

[25] Kothari S. K., Singh C. P., Vijay K. Y., Singh K., J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 78 (2003) 422-425.

Google Scholar

[26] Kumar A., B. A., Mir D, Sehgal T. H. Dar, S. Koul, M. K. Kaul, S. N. Raina, G. N. Qazi., Plant systematics and Evolution 291(3-4) (2011) 141-151.

Google Scholar

[27] Kumar G., Gupta P., Turk. J. Biol. 33 (2009) 123-128.

Google Scholar

[28] Kumar G., Singh V., J. Ind. Bot. Soc. 82 (2003) 19-22.

Google Scholar

[29] Miege J., Ann Fac Sci Univ Dakar 5 (1960) 75-85.

Google Scholar

[30] Mir B. A., S. Loul A. Kumar M. K. Kaul, A. S. Soodan, S. N. Raina, Indian Journal of Biotecnolog 9 (2010) 325-328.

Google Scholar

[31] Mohan Ram H. Y., I. Kamini, Phytomorphology 14 (1964) 574-587.

Google Scholar

[32] Pavadai P., S. Gnanamurthy, D. Dhanavel, International Journal of Advanced Research 1(7) (2013) 223-228.

Google Scholar

[33] Sharma V., Kumar G., Cytologia 69(3) (2004) 243-248.

Google Scholar

[34] Shroni K., Bodele., Wall. Ex. Nees. 3(6) (2013) 55-57.

Google Scholar

[35] Singh B. B., Rad Bot 14 (1974) 195-199.

Google Scholar

[36] Singh G R., Sareen P. K., Sharan R. P., J. Cytol. Genet. 34 (1999) 21-23.

Google Scholar

[37] Utsunomiya K. S., Bione N. C. P., Pagliarini M. S., Cytologia 67 (2002) 169-176.

Google Scholar

[38] Woodstock and Justics, Rad. Bot. 7 (1967) 129-136. ( Received 18 June 2014; accepted 26 June 2014 )

Google Scholar