The Modified Structural Quasi Score Estimator for Poisson Regression Parameters with Covariate Measurement Error

Fevi Novkaniza (1), Khairil Anwar Notodiputro (2), I Wayan Mangku (3), Kusman Sadik (4)
(1) Department of Statistics, IPB University, Bogor, West Java, 16680, Indonesia
(2) Department of Statistics, IPB University, Bogor, West Java, 16680, Indonesia
(3) Department of Mathematics, IPB University, Bogor, West Java, 16680, Indonesia
(4) Department of Statistics, IPB University, Bogor, West Java, 16680, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (IJASEIT) :
Novkaniza, Fevi, et al. “The Modified Structural Quasi Score Estimator for Poisson Regression Parameters With Covariate Measurement Error”. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 12, no. 5, Sept. 2022, pp. 1875-81, doi:10.18517/ijaseit.12.5.12163.
This article proposed the Modified Structural Quasi Score (MSQS) estimators for Poisson regression parameters when a covariate is subject to measurement error. We study the situation when the true covariate in the Poisson regression model is unobserved, and the surrogate for this covariate is related to the true covariate by the additive measurement error model. We assumed that true covariate as a random variable with unknown density function distribution and its observable values as surrogates, which also has Poisson distribution. We applied the Empirical Bayes Deconvolution (EBD) method for estimating the true covariate density with a finite discrete support set. To estimate Poisson regression parameters, we construct an MSQS estimating equation based on proper functions for the mean and variance of the Poisson distributed surrogate. The MSQS estimator for the Poisson regression parameter is the root of the quasi-score function based on the quasi-likelihood method. We did some simulation scenarios for assessing the MSQS estimator by assuming the true covariate comes from Gamma distribution as a conjugate before Poison distribution. We compute the standard error of the mean, standard deviation, and bias of the MSQS estimator for various sample sizes to examine the estimator's appropriateness. The simulation showed that a combination of the finite discrete support set of surrogates based on the range values and smaller-scale parameter of Gamma distribution yields smaller values of bias estimator and the estimated standard deviation.

L. P. Fí¡vero and P. Belfiore, Regression Models for Count Data: Poisson and Negative Binomial. 2019.

Z. Xie, “Predicting publication productivity for researchers: A piecewise Poisson model,” J. Informetr., vol. 14, no. 3, p. 101065, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2020.101065.

F. Pagliara and F. Mauriello, “Modelling the impact of High-Speed Rail on tourists with Geographically Weighted Poisson Regression,” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., vol. 132, no. July 2018, pp. 780-790, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2019.12.025.

K. Chen, R. Huang, N. H. Chan, and C. Y. Yau, “Subgroup analysis of zero-inflated Poisson regression model with applications to insurance data,” Insur. Math. Econ., vol. 86, pp. 8-18, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2019.01.009.

K. Adusumilli, D. Kurisu, T. Otsu, and Y.-J. Whang, “Inference on distribution functions under measurement error,” J. Econom., vol. 215, no. 1, pp. 131-164, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2019.09.002.

E. Kroc and B. D. Zumbo, “A transdisciplinary view of measurement error models and the variations of X=T+E,” J. Math. Psychol., vol. 98, p. 102372, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2020.102372.

F. Elmagbri and R. M. Mnatsakanov, “Nonparametric density estimation based on the scaled Laplace transform inversion,” Trans. A. Razmadze Math. Inst., vol. 172, no. 3, pp. 440-447, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.trmi.2018.09.003.

M. B. Kamel and T. Sayed, “Cyclist-vehicle crash modeling with measurement error in traffic exposure,” Accid. Anal. Prev., vol. 144, no. January, p. 105612, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105612.

B. Efron, “Empirical Bayes deconvolution estimates,” Biometrika, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 1-20, 2015, doi: 10.1093/biomet/asv068.

M. Thamerus, “Modelling Count Data with Heteroscedastic Measurement Error in the Covariates,” Discuss. Pap. 58, SFB 386, vol. 58, 1997.

Rozliman N.A, Nur Ibrahim Adriana Irawati, and R. Mohammad Yunus, “Bayesian approach to errors-in-variables in regression models,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 1842, 2017, doi: 10.1063/1.4982856.

M. Li, Y. Ma, and R. Li, “Semiparametric regression for measurement error model with heteroscedastic error,” J. Multivar. Anal., vol. 171, pp. 320-338, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jmva.2018.12.012.

G. Y. Yi, “Statistical Analysis with Measurement Error or Misclassication: Strategy, Method and Application,” 2017.

A. Kukush, H. Schneeweis, and R. Wolf, “Three estimators for the poisson regression model with measurement errors,” Stat. Pap., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 351-368, 2004, doi: 10.1007/BF02777577.

L. Li, M. Palta, and J. Shao, “A measurement error model with a poisson distributed surrogate,” Stat. Med., vol. 23, no. 16, pp. 2527-2536, 2004, doi: 10.1002/sim.1838.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).