Vol 17 (2022): November
Human Resource Management

The Effect of Workload Rewards and Organizational Commitment on Employee Performance Through Job Satisfaction as an Intervening Variable
Pengaruh Reward Beban Kerja dan Komitmen Organisasi terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Melalui Kepuasan Kerja sebagai Variabel Intervening


Inneke Cahyati
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Sumartik
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia *

(*) Corresponding Author
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
Published October 15, 2022
Keywords
  • Job Satisfaction,
  • Employee Performance,
  • Organizational Commitment,
  • Workload,
  • Reward
How to Cite
Cahyati, I., & Sumartik. (2022). The Effect of Workload Rewards and Organizational Commitment on Employee Performance Through Job Satisfaction as an Intervening Variable. Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review, 17, 10.21070/ijler.v17i0.866. https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.v17i0.866

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of reward (X1), workload (X2), and organizational commitment (X3) on employee performance (Y) through job satisfaction as an intervening variable (Z). This research has a causal concept with the aim of obtaining truth results whether proven or not through the formulated hypothesis and using data analysis.  The analytical tool used in this research is path analysis technique with the help of SPSS (Statistical Package for the social science) version 25 for windows. The primary data in this study were obtained from a questionnaire whose measurement was using a Likert scale which was tested using validity and reliability tests. The results of this study show that (1) reward has a positive and significant effect on job satisfaction, (2) workload has a positive and significant effect on job satisfaction, (3) organizational commitment has a positive and significant effect on job satisfaction, (4) rewards have a positive effect and significant to employee performance, (5) workload has a positive and significant effect on employee performance, (6) organizational commitment has a positive and significant effect on employee performance, (7) job satisfaction has a positive and significant effect on employee performance, (8) reward has an effect positive and significant impact on employee performance through job satisfaction as an intervening variable, (9) workload has a positive and significant effect on employee performance through job satisfaction as an intervening variable, (10) organizational commitment has a positive and significant effect on employee performance through job satisfaction as an intervening variable.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. A. P. A. . Mangkunegara, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan, Cetakan Ke. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, 2000.
  2. M. Özpehlivan and A. Z. Acar, “Assessment of a Multidimensional Job Satisfaction Instrument. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,” vol. 210, pp. 283–290, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.368.
  3. P. S. dan T. A. J. Robbins, Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat, 2012.
  4. T. H. Handoko, Manajemen Personalia & Sumberdaya Manusia, Edisi Ke-2. Yogyakarta: BPFE-YOGYAKARTA, 2014.
  5. R. S. A. Meyrina, “The Implementation of Rewards and Punishment on The Performance of The Employees within The Ministry of Law and Human Rights,” J. Ilm. Kebijak. Huk., vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 139–157, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.balitbangham.go.id/index.php/kebijakan/article/view/151.
  6. Moekijat, manajemen personalia dan sumber daya manusia. Bandung, 2004.
  7. Fitriana, Ria, A. Eliyana, Yusuf, and Y. Suryani, “understaning the mediator of role of job satisfaction on lecturer’s organizational commitmen,” Bus. Manag. Res. Adv. Econ., 2016.
  8. C. M. Taurisa and I. Ratnawati, “Analisis Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi dan Kepuasan Kerja terhadap Komitmen Organisasional dalam meningkatkan Kinerja Karyawan,” J. Bisnis Dan Ekon. (JBE), vol. 2, no. 19, pp. 170–187, 2012.
  9. Mahmudi, manajemen sektor publik. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN, 2013.
  10. A. S. Putra, “Analisis Pengaruh Beban Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Divisi Marketing dan Kredit PT. WOM Finance Cabang Depok,” J. Stud. Manaj. Indones., vol. 22, 2012.
  11. B. Hartono and R. Setiawan, “Pengaruh Komitmen Organisasional terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Karyawan Paparon’s Pizza City of Tomorrow,” urnal Stud. Manaj. Dan Organ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2013.
  12. M. Hariasih and Sumartik, “Implementation of the Remuneration Grading System on Employee Performance through Employee Incentives for Conventional Bank in Sidoarjo,” Semin. Nas. FMI Ke-10, 2018.
  13. I. Yudha, “Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi dan Kepuasan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan pada PT. Jaya Abadi Sumber Pasifik Kota Jambi,” Manaj. Dan Kewirausahaan, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 24–35, 2018.
  14. Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitaif, Kualitatif dan R&D, Cetakan 11. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2015.
  15. U. Sekaran and Bougie, Metode penelitian untuk bisnis: pendeatan pengembangan-keahlian, Buku ke 2. Jakarta: Salemba Empat, 2017.
  16. I. Ghozali, Aplikasi Analisis Multivariete Dengan Program IBM SPSS-23, Edisi ke-8. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 2016.
  17. I. Fahmi, Manajemen sumber daya manusia, teori, dan aplikasi. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2016.
  18. Priansa, “Pengaruh Motivasi, Komitmen Organisasi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Dengan Pengembangan Karir Sebagai Variabel Intervening,” Ekon. Dan Bisnis Univ. Brawijaya, pp. 22–45, 2016.
  19. L. Paramita and G. Sendow, “Pengaruh Komunikasi Organisasi Dan Stres Kerja Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Serta Dampaknya Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Di Perusahaan Umum Bulog Divisi Regional Sulawesi Utara,” J. Ris. Ekon. Manajemen, Bisnis dan Akunt., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 131–142, 2016, doi: 10.35794/emba.v4i1.11580.