Going digital: opportunities and barriers in the use of technology for health research

Autores/as

  • Cauane Blumenberg Programa de Pós-Graduação em Epidemiologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas. Pelotas, RS, Brazil/Grupo de Pesquisa e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande. Rio Grande, RS, Brazil
  • David Peiris The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales. Sydney, Australia
  • Christian Loret de Mola Grupo de Pesquisa e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande/Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande. Rio Grande, RS, Brazil/Universidade Cientifica del Sur. Lima, Peru
  • Manohan Sinnadurai The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales. Sydney, Australia
  • Maoyi Tian The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales. Sydney, Australia/The George Institute for Global Health at Peking University Health Science Center. Beijing, China
  • Alline M Beleigoli Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University. Adelaide, Australia/Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde do Adulto, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte, Brasil
  • Maria Lazo-Porras Cronicas, Centro de Excelencia en Enfermedades Crónicas, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia. Lima, Peru/Division of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, University of Geneva and Geneva University Hospitals. Geneva, Switzerland
  • Francisco Diez-Canseco Cronicas, Centro de Excelencia en Enfermedades Crónicas, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia. Lima, Peru
  • Miguel Paredes Rimac Seguros, Clínica Internacional, Pacífico Business School. Lima, Peru
  • L Max Labán-Seminario Cronicas, Centro de Excelencia en Enfermedades Crónicas, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia. Lima, Peru/CI-Emerge, Centro de Investigación en Enfermedades Emergentes y Cambio Climático, Universidad Nacional de Piura. Piura, Peru
  • Jessica Hanae Zafra-Tanaka Cronicas, Centro de Excelencia en Enfermedades Crónicas, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia. Lima, Peru/Division of Tropical and Humanitarian Medicine, University of Geneva and Geneva University Hospitals. Geneva, Switzerland
  • Devarsetty Praveen The George Institute for Global Health. New Delhi, India/University of New South Wales. Australia/Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education. India
  • J Jaime Miranda The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales. Sydney, Australia/Cronicas, Centro de Excelencia en Enfermedades Crónicas, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia. Lima, Peru

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21149/12977

Palabras clave:

digital health, health technology, artificial intelligence, data collection, web-based intervention

Resumen

Digital health refers to the use of novel information com­munication technologies in healthcare. The use of these technologies could positively impact public health and health outcomes of populations by generating timely data, and facili­tating the process of data collection, analysis, and knowledge translation. Using selected case studies, we aim to describe the opportunities and barriers in the use of technology applied to health-related research. We focus on three areas: strategies to generate new data using novel data collection methods, strategies to use and analyze existing data, and using digital health for health-related interventions. Exemplars from seven countries are provided to illustrate activity across these areas. Although the use of health-related technologies is increasing, challenges remain to support their adoption and scale-up –especially for under-served populations. Research using digital health approaches should take a user-centered design, actively working with the population of interest to maximize their uptake and effectiveness.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

World Health Organization. Classification of digital health interventions v1.0: a shared language to describe the uses of digital technology for health. Geneva: WHO, 2018 [cited 2021 May]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/260480/1/WHO-RHR-18.06-eng.pdf?ua=1

Bhattacharyya O, Mossman K, Gustafsson L, Schneider EC. Using human-centered design to build a digital health advisor for patients with complex needs: persona and prototype development. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(5):e10318. https://doi.org/10.2196/10318

Russell SJ, Norvig P. Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1995.

Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM. Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method. Hoboken: Wiley, 2014.

Hardigan PC, Succar CT, Fleisher JM. An analysis of response rate and economic costs between mail and web-based surveys among practicing dentists: a randomized trial. J Community Health. 2012;37(2):383-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-011-9455-6

Blumberg SJ, Ganesh N, Luke JV, Gonzales G. Wireless substitution: state-level estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, 2012. Nat Health Stat Report. 2013;(70):1-16 [cited 2021 May]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr070.pdf

Blumenberg C, Menezes AMB, Gonçalves H, Assunção MCF, Wehrmeister FC, Barros AJD. How different online recruitment methods impact on recruitment rates for the web-based coortesnaweb project: a randomised trial. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019;19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0767-z

Harris ML, Loxton D, Wigginton B, Lucke JC. Recruiting online: lessons from a longitudinal survey of contraception and pregnancy intentions of young australian women. Am J Epidemiol. 2015;181(10):737-46. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwv006

Tourangeau R, Yan T. Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychol Bull. 2007;133(5):859-83. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.859

Porter C, Favara M, Sánchez A, Scott D. The impact of COVID-19 lockdowns on physical domestic violence: Evidence from a list randomization experiment. SSM - Population Health. 2021;14:100792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100792

Greenleaf AR, Gibson DG, Khattar C, Labrique AB, Pariyo GW. Building the evidence base for remote data collection in low- and middle-income countries: comparing reliability and accuracy across survey modalities. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(5):e140. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7331

Couper MP. Web surveys: a review of issues and approaches. Public Opinion Quarterly. 2000;64(4):464-94. https://doi.org/10.1086/318641

Blumenberg C, Barros AJD. Response rate differences between web and alternative data collection methods for public health research: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Public Health. 2018;63(6):765-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-018-1108-4

Cornesse C, Bosnjak M. Is there an association between survey characteristics and representativeness? A meta-analysis. Survey Res Meth. 2018;12(1):1-13. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2018.v12i1.7205

Blumenberg C, Menezes AMB, Gonçalves H, Assunção MCF, Wehrmeister FC, Barros FC, et al. The role of questionnaire length and reminders frequency on response rates to a web-based epidemiologic study: a randomised trial. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2019;22(6):625-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2019.1629755

Bälter KA, Bälter O, Fondell E, Lagerros YT. Web-based and mailed questionnaires: a comparison of response rates and compliance. Epidemiology. 2005;16(4):577-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ede.0000164553.16591.4b

Guo Y, Kopec JA, Cibere J, Li LC, Goldsmith CH. Population survey features and response rates: a randomized experiment. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(8):1422-6. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2016.303198

McInroy LB. Pitfalls, potentials, and ethics of online survey research: LGBTQ and other marginalized and hard-to-access youths. Soc Work Res. 2016;40(2):83-94. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/svw005

Gonçalves H, Wehrmeister FC, Assunção MCF, Tovo-Rodrigues L, Oliveira IO Murray J, et al. Cohort Profile Update: The 1993 Pelotas (Brazil) Birth Cohort follow-up at 22 years. Int J Epidemiol. 2018;47(5):1389-90e. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyx249

Tian M, Ajay VS, Dunzhu D, Hameed SS, Li X, Liu Z, et al. A cluster-randomized, controlled trial of a simplified multifaceted management program for individuals at high cardiovascular risk (SimCard Trial) in Rural Tibet, China, and Haryana, India. Circulation. 2015;132(9):815-24. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.115.015373

OpenMRS Inc. OpenMRS [internet]. OpenMRS, 2021 [cited 2021 May 31]. Available from: https://openmrs.org/

Tian M, Yin X, Dunzhu D, Liu Z, Li C, Sun H, et al. A qualitative evaluation of a simplified cardiovascular management program in Tibet, China. Global Health. 2018;14(1):24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-018-0342-0

Patel A, Praveen D, Maharani A, Oceandy D, Pilard Q, Kohli MPS, et al. Association of multifaceted mobile technology–enabled primary care intervention with cardiovascular disease risk management in rural Indonesia. JAMA Cardiol. 2019;4(10):978-86. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2019.2974

Loret de Mola C, Blumenberg C, Martins RC, Martins-Silva T, Carpena MX, Del-Ponte B, et al. Increased depression and anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazilian mothers: a longitudinal study. Braz J Psychiatry. 2021;43(3). https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-4446-2020-1628

Loret de Mola C, Martins-Silva T, Carpena MX, Del-Ponte B, Blumenberg C, Martins RC, et al. Maternal mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in the 2019 Rio Grande birth cohort. Braz J Psy. 2021;43(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-4446-2020-1673

Health Action International. About ACCISS. Health Action International, 2021 [cited 2021 Jan 17]. Available from: https://haiweb.org/what-we-do/about-acciss/

Lazo-Porras M. Acciones para mejorar el acceso a Insulina en el Perú – ACCISS Fase 2. Perú: Cronicas, 2020 [cited 2021 Jun 20]. Available from: https://cronicas-upch.pe/acciones-para-mejorar-el-acceso-a-insulina-en-el-peru-acciss-fase-2/

Pappa GL, Cunha TO, Bicalho PV, Ribeiro A, Couto Silva AP, Meira JW, et al. Factors associated with weight change in online weight management communities: a case study in the loseit reddit community. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(1):e17. https://doi.org/10.2196%2Fjmir.5816

Neal B, Tian M, Li N, Elliott P, Yan LL, Labarthe DR, et al. Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of the Salt Substitute and Stroke Study (SSaSS)-A large-scale cluster randomized controlled trial. Am Heart J. 2017;188:109-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2017.02.033

Meng Q, Xu K. Progress and challenges of the rural cooperative medical scheme in China. Bull World Health Organ. 2014;92(6):447-51. https://doi.org/10.2471%2FBLT.13.131532

Huang L, Yu J, Neal B, Liu Y, Yin X, Hao Z, et al. Feasibility and validity of using death surveillance data and SmartVA for fact and cause of death in clinical trials in rural China: a substudy of the China salt substitute and stroke study (SSaSS). J Epidemiol Community Health. 2021;75:540-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2020-214063

Beleigoli AM, Andrade AQ, Cançado AG, Paulo MN, Diniz MDFH, Ribeiro AL. Web-based digital health interventions for weight loss and lifestyle habit changes in overweight and obese adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(1):e298. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9609

Beleigoli A, Andrade AQ, Diniz MDF, Ribeiro AL. Personalized web-based weight loss behavior change program with and without dietitian online coaching for adults with overweight and obesity: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(11):e17494. https://doi.org/10.2196/17494

Rubinstein A, Miranda JJ, Beratarrechea A, Diez-Canseco F, Kanter R, Gutierrez L, et al. Effectiveness of an mHealth intervention to improve the cardiometabolic profile of people with prehypertension in low-resource urban settings in Latin America: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4(1):52-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-8587(15)00381-2

Bernabe-Ortiz A, Pauschardt J, Diez-Canseco F, Miranda JJ. Sustainability of mHealth effects on cardiometabolic risk factors: five-year results of a randomized clinical trial. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(4):e14595. https://doi.org/10.2196/14595

Carrillo-Larco RM, Jiwani SS, Diez-Canseco F, Kanter R, Beratarrechea A, Irazola V, et al. Implementation tells us more beyond pooled estimates: secondary analysis of a multicountry mHealth Trial to reduce blood pressure. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018;6(11):e10226. https://doi.org/10.2196/10226

Kwan JL, Lo L, Ferguson J, Goldberg H, Diaz-Martinez JP, Tomlinson G, et al. Computerised clinical decision support systems and absolute improvements in care: meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. BMJ. 2020;370:m3216. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3216

Lewkowicz D, Wohlbrandt A, Boettinger E. Economic impact of clinical decision support interventions based on electronic health records. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):871. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05688-3

Peiris D, Usherwood T, Panaretto K, Harris M, Hunt J, Patel B, et al. The Treatment of cardiovascular risk in primary care using Electronic Decision suppOrt (TORPEDO) study: intervention development and protocol for a cluster randomised, controlled trial of an electronic decision support and quality improvement intervention in Australian pri-mary healthcare. BMJ Open. 2012;2(6):e002177. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002177

Peiris D, Sun L, Patel A, Tian M, Essue B, Jan S, et al. Systematic medical assessment, referral and treatment for diabetes care in China using lay family health promoters: protocol for the SMARTDiabetes cluster randomised controlled trial. Implementation Sci. 2015;11(1):116. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0481-8

Crawford F, Nicolson DJ, Amanna AE, Martin A, Gupta S, Leese GP, et al. Preventing foot ulceration in diabetes: systematic review and meta-analyses of RCT data. Diabetologia. 2020;63(1):49-64. https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs00125-019-05020-7

Lazo-Porras M, Bernabe-Ortiz A, Taype-Rondan A, Gilman RH, Malaga G, Manrique H, et al. Foot thermometry with mHeath-based supplementation to prevent diabetic foot ulcers: A randomized controlled trial. Wellcome Open Res. 2020;5:23. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15531.2

Andrade AQ, Beleigoli AMR, Silva TMS, de Fátima H, Diniz M, Ribeiro ALP. Exploring the User Engagement Scale Short Form as a determinant of adherence in digital health interventions. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019;264:1901-2. https://doi.org/10.3233/shti190704

O’Brien HL, Cairns P, Hall M. A practical approach to measuring user engagement with the refined user engagement scale (UES) and new UES short form. Int J Hum Comput. 2018;112:28-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.01.004

Yardley L, Spring BJ, Riper H, Morrison LG, Crane DH, Curtis K, et al. Understanding and promoting effective engagement with digital behavior change interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2016;51(5):833-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.06.015

Link MW, Murphy J, Schober MF, Buskirk TD, Hunter-Childs J, Langer- Tesfaye C. Mobile technologies for conducting, augmenting and potentially replacing surveys: executive summary of the AAPOR task force on emerging technologies in public opinion research. Public Opinion Quarterly. 2014;78(4):779-87. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfu054

Malodia S, Gupta S, Jaiswal AK. Reverse innovation: a conceptual framework. J Acad Mark Sci. 2020;48(5):1009-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00703-4

Descargas

Publicado

2022-06-13

Cómo citar

1.
Blumenberg C, Peiris D, Loret de Mola C, Sinnadurai M, Tian M, M Beleigoli A, Lazo-Porras M, Diez-Canseco F, Paredes M, Labán-Seminario LM, Zafra-Tanaka JH, Praveen D, Miranda JJ. Going digital: opportunities and barriers in the use of technology for health research. Salud Publica Mex [Internet]. 13 de junio de 2022 [citado 20 de mayo de 2024];64:S22-S30. Disponible en: https://www.saludpublica.mx/index.php/spm/article/view/12977

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a