Going digital: opportunities and barriers in the use of technology for health research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21149/12977Palabras clave:
digital health, health technology, artificial intelligence, data collection, web-based interventionResumen
Digital health refers to the use of novel information communication technologies in healthcare. The use of these technologies could positively impact public health and health outcomes of populations by generating timely data, and facilitating the process of data collection, analysis, and knowledge translation. Using selected case studies, we aim to describe the opportunities and barriers in the use of technology applied to health-related research. We focus on three areas: strategies to generate new data using novel data collection methods, strategies to use and analyze existing data, and using digital health for health-related interventions. Exemplars from seven countries are provided to illustrate activity across these areas. Although the use of health-related technologies is increasing, challenges remain to support their adoption and scale-up –especially for under-served populations. Research using digital health approaches should take a user-centered design, actively working with the population of interest to maximize their uptake and effectiveness.
Descargas
Citas
World Health Organization. Classification of digital health interventions v1.0: a shared language to describe the uses of digital technology for health. Geneva: WHO, 2018 [cited 2021 May]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/260480/1/WHO-RHR-18.06-eng.pdf?ua=1
Bhattacharyya O, Mossman K, Gustafsson L, Schneider EC. Using human-centered design to build a digital health advisor for patients with complex needs: persona and prototype development. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(5):e10318. https://doi.org/10.2196/10318
Russell SJ, Norvig P. Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1995.
Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM. Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method. Hoboken: Wiley, 2014.
Hardigan PC, Succar CT, Fleisher JM. An analysis of response rate and economic costs between mail and web-based surveys among practicing dentists: a randomized trial. J Community Health. 2012;37(2):383-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-011-9455-6
Blumberg SJ, Ganesh N, Luke JV, Gonzales G. Wireless substitution: state-level estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, 2012. Nat Health Stat Report. 2013;(70):1-16 [cited 2021 May]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr070.pdf
Blumenberg C, Menezes AMB, Gonçalves H, Assunção MCF, Wehrmeister FC, Barros AJD. How different online recruitment methods impact on recruitment rates for the web-based coortesnaweb project: a randomised trial. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019;19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0767-z
Harris ML, Loxton D, Wigginton B, Lucke JC. Recruiting online: lessons from a longitudinal survey of contraception and pregnancy intentions of young australian women. Am J Epidemiol. 2015;181(10):737-46. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwv006
Tourangeau R, Yan T. Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychol Bull. 2007;133(5):859-83. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.859
Porter C, Favara M, Sánchez A, Scott D. The impact of COVID-19 lockdowns on physical domestic violence: Evidence from a list randomization experiment. SSM - Population Health. 2021;14:100792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100792
Greenleaf AR, Gibson DG, Khattar C, Labrique AB, Pariyo GW. Building the evidence base for remote data collection in low- and middle-income countries: comparing reliability and accuracy across survey modalities. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(5):e140. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7331
Couper MP. Web surveys: a review of issues and approaches. Public Opinion Quarterly. 2000;64(4):464-94. https://doi.org/10.1086/318641
Blumenberg C, Barros AJD. Response rate differences between web and alternative data collection methods for public health research: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Public Health. 2018;63(6):765-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-018-1108-4
Cornesse C, Bosnjak M. Is there an association between survey characteristics and representativeness? A meta-analysis. Survey Res Meth. 2018;12(1):1-13. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2018.v12i1.7205
Blumenberg C, Menezes AMB, Gonçalves H, Assunção MCF, Wehrmeister FC, Barros FC, et al. The role of questionnaire length and reminders frequency on response rates to a web-based epidemiologic study: a randomised trial. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2019;22(6):625-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2019.1629755
Bälter KA, Bälter O, Fondell E, Lagerros YT. Web-based and mailed questionnaires: a comparison of response rates and compliance. Epidemiology. 2005;16(4):577-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ede.0000164553.16591.4b
Guo Y, Kopec JA, Cibere J, Li LC, Goldsmith CH. Population survey features and response rates: a randomized experiment. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(8):1422-6. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2016.303198
McInroy LB. Pitfalls, potentials, and ethics of online survey research: LGBTQ and other marginalized and hard-to-access youths. Soc Work Res. 2016;40(2):83-94. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/svw005
Gonçalves H, Wehrmeister FC, Assunção MCF, Tovo-Rodrigues L, Oliveira IO Murray J, et al. Cohort Profile Update: The 1993 Pelotas (Brazil) Birth Cohort follow-up at 22 years. Int J Epidemiol. 2018;47(5):1389-90e. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyx249
Tian M, Ajay VS, Dunzhu D, Hameed SS, Li X, Liu Z, et al. A cluster-randomized, controlled trial of a simplified multifaceted management program for individuals at high cardiovascular risk (SimCard Trial) in Rural Tibet, China, and Haryana, India. Circulation. 2015;132(9):815-24. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.115.015373
OpenMRS Inc. OpenMRS [internet]. OpenMRS, 2021 [cited 2021 May 31]. Available from: https://openmrs.org/
Tian M, Yin X, Dunzhu D, Liu Z, Li C, Sun H, et al. A qualitative evaluation of a simplified cardiovascular management program in Tibet, China. Global Health. 2018;14(1):24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-018-0342-0
Patel A, Praveen D, Maharani A, Oceandy D, Pilard Q, Kohli MPS, et al. Association of multifaceted mobile technology–enabled primary care intervention with cardiovascular disease risk management in rural Indonesia. JAMA Cardiol. 2019;4(10):978-86. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2019.2974
Loret de Mola C, Blumenberg C, Martins RC, Martins-Silva T, Carpena MX, Del-Ponte B, et al. Increased depression and anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazilian mothers: a longitudinal study. Braz J Psychiatry. 2021;43(3). https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-4446-2020-1628
Loret de Mola C, Martins-Silva T, Carpena MX, Del-Ponte B, Blumenberg C, Martins RC, et al. Maternal mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in the 2019 Rio Grande birth cohort. Braz J Psy. 2021;43(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-4446-2020-1673
Health Action International. About ACCISS. Health Action International, 2021 [cited 2021 Jan 17]. Available from: https://haiweb.org/what-we-do/about-acciss/
Lazo-Porras M. Acciones para mejorar el acceso a Insulina en el Perú – ACCISS Fase 2. Perú: Cronicas, 2020 [cited 2021 Jun 20]. Available from: https://cronicas-upch.pe/acciones-para-mejorar-el-acceso-a-insulina-en-el-peru-acciss-fase-2/
Pappa GL, Cunha TO, Bicalho PV, Ribeiro A, Couto Silva AP, Meira JW, et al. Factors associated with weight change in online weight management communities: a case study in the loseit reddit community. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(1):e17. https://doi.org/10.2196%2Fjmir.5816
Neal B, Tian M, Li N, Elliott P, Yan LL, Labarthe DR, et al. Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of the Salt Substitute and Stroke Study (SSaSS)-A large-scale cluster randomized controlled trial. Am Heart J. 2017;188:109-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2017.02.033
Meng Q, Xu K. Progress and challenges of the rural cooperative medical scheme in China. Bull World Health Organ. 2014;92(6):447-51. https://doi.org/10.2471%2FBLT.13.131532
Huang L, Yu J, Neal B, Liu Y, Yin X, Hao Z, et al. Feasibility and validity of using death surveillance data and SmartVA for fact and cause of death in clinical trials in rural China: a substudy of the China salt substitute and stroke study (SSaSS). J Epidemiol Community Health. 2021;75:540-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2020-214063
Beleigoli AM, Andrade AQ, Cançado AG, Paulo MN, Diniz MDFH, Ribeiro AL. Web-based digital health interventions for weight loss and lifestyle habit changes in overweight and obese adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(1):e298. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9609
Beleigoli A, Andrade AQ, Diniz MDF, Ribeiro AL. Personalized web-based weight loss behavior change program with and without dietitian online coaching for adults with overweight and obesity: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(11):e17494. https://doi.org/10.2196/17494
Rubinstein A, Miranda JJ, Beratarrechea A, Diez-Canseco F, Kanter R, Gutierrez L, et al. Effectiveness of an mHealth intervention to improve the cardiometabolic profile of people with prehypertension in low-resource urban settings in Latin America: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4(1):52-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-8587(15)00381-2
Bernabe-Ortiz A, Pauschardt J, Diez-Canseco F, Miranda JJ. Sustainability of mHealth effects on cardiometabolic risk factors: five-year results of a randomized clinical trial. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(4):e14595. https://doi.org/10.2196/14595
Carrillo-Larco RM, Jiwani SS, Diez-Canseco F, Kanter R, Beratarrechea A, Irazola V, et al. Implementation tells us more beyond pooled estimates: secondary analysis of a multicountry mHealth Trial to reduce blood pressure. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018;6(11):e10226. https://doi.org/10.2196/10226
Kwan JL, Lo L, Ferguson J, Goldberg H, Diaz-Martinez JP, Tomlinson G, et al. Computerised clinical decision support systems and absolute improvements in care: meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. BMJ. 2020;370:m3216. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3216
Lewkowicz D, Wohlbrandt A, Boettinger E. Economic impact of clinical decision support interventions based on electronic health records. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):871. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05688-3
Peiris D, Usherwood T, Panaretto K, Harris M, Hunt J, Patel B, et al. The Treatment of cardiovascular risk in primary care using Electronic Decision suppOrt (TORPEDO) study: intervention development and protocol for a cluster randomised, controlled trial of an electronic decision support and quality improvement intervention in Australian pri-mary healthcare. BMJ Open. 2012;2(6):e002177. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002177
Peiris D, Sun L, Patel A, Tian M, Essue B, Jan S, et al. Systematic medical assessment, referral and treatment for diabetes care in China using lay family health promoters: protocol for the SMARTDiabetes cluster randomised controlled trial. Implementation Sci. 2015;11(1):116. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0481-8
Crawford F, Nicolson DJ, Amanna AE, Martin A, Gupta S, Leese GP, et al. Preventing foot ulceration in diabetes: systematic review and meta-analyses of RCT data. Diabetologia. 2020;63(1):49-64. https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs00125-019-05020-7
Lazo-Porras M, Bernabe-Ortiz A, Taype-Rondan A, Gilman RH, Malaga G, Manrique H, et al. Foot thermometry with mHeath-based supplementation to prevent diabetic foot ulcers: A randomized controlled trial. Wellcome Open Res. 2020;5:23. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15531.2
Andrade AQ, Beleigoli AMR, Silva TMS, de Fátima H, Diniz M, Ribeiro ALP. Exploring the User Engagement Scale Short Form as a determinant of adherence in digital health interventions. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019;264:1901-2. https://doi.org/10.3233/shti190704
O’Brien HL, Cairns P, Hall M. A practical approach to measuring user engagement with the refined user engagement scale (UES) and new UES short form. Int J Hum Comput. 2018;112:28-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.01.004
Yardley L, Spring BJ, Riper H, Morrison LG, Crane DH, Curtis K, et al. Understanding and promoting effective engagement with digital behavior change interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2016;51(5):833-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.06.015
Link MW, Murphy J, Schober MF, Buskirk TD, Hunter-Childs J, Langer- Tesfaye C. Mobile technologies for conducting, augmenting and potentially replacing surveys: executive summary of the AAPOR task force on emerging technologies in public opinion research. Public Opinion Quarterly. 2014;78(4):779-87. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfu054
Malodia S, Gupta S, Jaiswal AK. Reverse innovation: a conceptual framework. J Acad Mark Sci. 2020;48(5):1009-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00703-4
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 Salud Pública de México
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Al proponer un trabajo para su publicación, los autores aceptan las condiciones contenidas en las presentes normas y ceden a Salud Pública de México los derechos patrimoniales sobre el artículo en cuestión, a fin de que ésta lo edite, publique, reproduzca, difunda, comercialice, traduzca o autorice su traducción a cualquier idioma.
Los derechos transferidos incluyen la publicación del artículo por cualquier medio, sea éste impreso, magnético o electrónico, o por cualquier otro soporte o medio de difusión que exista o pueda crearse en el futuro, así como la realización de publicaciones mediante la concesión de licencias totales o parciales a terceros.
Los artículos aceptados serán publicados en Salud Pública de México bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional.
Los trabajos propuestos deberán ser originales e inéditos, y no podrán presentarse a ninguna otra revista mientras se encuentren sometidos a la consideración de Salud Pública de México.También se reciben trabajos completos publicados previamente en forma de resumen, o trabajos no publicados presentados en congresos o seminarios.
Todos los trabajos serán publicados con pleno conocimiento de los autores.
Los artículos firmados son responsabilidad de los autores y no necesariamente reflejan la opinión de la revista, del Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública o de la institución a la que están afiliados los autores.