Lone Anarchists and Peace Pilgrims: The Relevance of Political Motivations to Sentencing

(2018) 44(2) Monash University Law Review

25 Pages Posted: 12 Jun 2019

See all articles by Jamie Walvisch

Jamie Walvisch

Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne

Date Written: March 26, 2019

Abstract

In late 2017, a Tasmanian ‘anarchist’ wearing a ‘Vote Yes’ [for same-sex marriage] badge headbutted former Prime Minister Tony Abbott. A few months later, six ‘peace pilgrims’ were sentenced for trespassing onto the Pine Gap military base as part of a political protest. These two cases raised the important question of what effect (if any) offenders’ political motivations should have on their sentences: an issue which has received surprisingly little academic attention in Australia to date.

This article examines the general relevance of political motivations to sentencing. It identifies two distinct approaches that have been taken in the Australian case law: a sympathetic approach, in which political motivations are considered to be mitigating; and an unsympathetic approach, in which politically motivated offences are seen to require strongly denunciatory and deterrent sentences. It explores the factors that influence sentencing judges’ adoption of a particular approach, and sketches out some key principles that should guide judges when determining whether an offender’s political motivations are mitigating, drawing on a combination of political philosophy and Australian constitutional law.

Keywords: Sentencing, Political Offenders, Legal Theory, Australian Constitutional Law

JEL Classification: K14

Suggested Citation

Walvisch, Jamie, Lone Anarchists and Peace Pilgrims: The Relevance of Political Motivations to Sentencing (March 26, 2019). (2018) 44(2) Monash University Law Review , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3394600 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3394600

Jamie Walvisch (Contact Author)

Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne ( email )

185 Pelham Street
Melbourne, VIC 3010
Australia

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
36
Abstract Views
376
PlumX Metrics