Budget strategy in the conditions of economic globalization
-
Author(s)Igor ChugunovLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3612-7236
,
Valentyna MakohonLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2331-8455
,
Tetiana КrykunLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0355-5768
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(3).2019.08
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2019, Issue #3, pp. 101-110
- Cited by
- 1264 Views
-
320 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Economic changes create a strong need for the reconsideration of the system of financial and budgetary knowledge and paradigms already created in developed countries regarding the possibility of their use in the countries with developing economies. In this article, the authors clarify that the process of formation of the efficient and mutually agreed budget policy with strategic tasks of the social and economical development of countries requires development of the budget strategy. Its essence is the dynamic realization of the system of goals, principles, directions, tasks of state authorities, co-ordination and adequacy of their long-term regulatory measures to internal and external changes in the economic environment and social transformations aimed at ensuring macroeconomic stability, accelerating economic growth and improving the well-being of the population. The principles of budget strategy development have been clearly defined: scientific substantiation; integrity; efficiency; systematic approach; adaptability; variability; interdependence; purposefulness; sociality; legitimacy. The share of government expenditures, budget deficit and public debt in the gross domestic product in the EU and Ukraine has been estimated. The priority directions of budget strategies in the conditions of economic transformations have been defined, in particular, regarding the increase of efficiency of public expenditures and establishment of restrictions on their level of growth; improvement of the mechanism for managing budget deficits, public debt and guarantees and reduction of their limits. The research has demonstrated a huge influence of the budget strategy on the social and economical processes and on the development of the social relations.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)Е62, H60, O40
-
References28
-
Tables3
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Average growth rate and the share of government expenditures in GDP, %
- Table 2. The share of budget deficit and public debt in GDP for 2008–2017, %
- Table 3. Projected increase in the share of government expenditures in GDP, %
-
- Bič, J. (2012). Change in the EU Budget after 2014 and Reforms of the EU Policies. Současná Evropa, 1, 53-72.
- Biryukov, A. G. (2014). О некоторых вопросах реализации долгосрочной бюджетной политики [O nekotorykh voprosakh realizatsii dolgosrochnoy byudzhetnoy politiki]. Finansovyy Zhurnal, 1(19), 61-68.
- Bolder, J., & Deeley, S. (2011). The Canadian Debt-Strategy Model: an Overview of the Principal Elements (Staff Discussion Paper No. 2011-3). Bank of Canada.
- Checherita-Westphal, C., & Rother, P. (2012). The impact of high government debt on economic growth and its channels: An empirical investigation for the euro area. European Economic Review, 56(7), 1392-1405.
- Council Directive (2011). Council Directive 2011/85/EU of 8 November 2011 on requirements for budgetary frameworks of the Member States. Official Journal of the European Union, L 306, 41-47.
- Dában, Т., Detragiache, Е., Bella, G., Milesi-Ferretti, М., & Symansky, S. (2003). Rules-Based Fiscal Policy in France, Germany, Italy, and Spain (Occasional Paper No. 225). Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.
- Dogaru, T.-C., & Dumitrescu-Peculea, A. (2016). Medium-term budgetary framework in the EU Member States: study case. Global Journal on Humanites and Social Sciences, 2(2), 163-169.
- Eberhard, M., & Presbitero, A. (2015). Public debt and growth: Heterogeneity and non-linearity. Journal of International Economics, 97, 45-58.
- European Commission (2004). Frequently asked questions: budget and financial perspectives (Press releases database MEMO/04/30). Brussels.
- European Commission (2010). Communication from the commission Europe 2020. A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Brussels.
- European Commission (2018). The 2018 Ageing Report: Economic and Budgetary Projections for the 28 EU Member States (2016–2070) (Institutional Paper 079). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
- Eurostat (n.d.). Official site of the Statistical Office of the European Commission.
- Geier, A. (2011). The debt brake – The Swiss fiscal rule at the federal level (Working Paper of the FFA No. 15).
- Höglund, L., & Svärdsten, F. (2018). Strategy work in the public sector – A balancing act of competing discourses. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 34, 225-232.
- Jakš, J. (2006). Financial Perspectives (Framework) 2007–2013 and the Challenge of the Eastern EU Enlargement (CAP Working Paper No. 11).
- Kutsenko, T. F. (2002). Бюджетно-налоговая политика [Byudzhetno-nalogovaya politika] (256 p.). M.: Finansy i statistika.
- Kuzmics, C., & Steg, J.-H. (2016). On public good provision mechanisms with dominant strategies and balanced budget (Center for Mathematical Economics Working Paper No. 553).
- Lysiak, L. V. (2009). Бюджетна політика у системі державного регулювання соціально-економічного розвитку України [Biudzhetna polityka u systemi derzhavnoho rehulyuvannya sotsialno-ekonomichnoho rozvytku Ukrainy] (600 p.). Kyiv: DNNU AFU.
- Ministry of Finance of Ukraine (n.d.). Official site of Ministry of Finance of Ukraine.
- Mintzberg, Н., Quinn, J., & Ghoshal, S. (2003). The Strategy Process: Concepts, Contexts, Cases (489 p.). Financal Times Management.
- Nicolae, P. V. (2013). The Financial and Budgetary Discipline in Romania – The Arrears of the Local Public Authorities. Annals – Economy Series, 2, 221-226.
- North, D. C. (1991). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (164 p.). Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions, Cambridge University Press.
- Ono, T., & Uchida, Y. (2018). Human Capital, Public Debt, and Economic Growth: A Political Economy Analysis. Journal of Macroeconomics, 57, 1-14.
- Panizza, U., & Presbitero, A. (2014). Public debt and economic growth: Is there a causal effect? Journal of Macroeconomics, 41, 21-41.
- Paykovich, P. R. (2015). Сущность и задачи бюджетной политики государства [Sushchnost i zadachi byudzhetnoy politiki gosudarstva]. Ekonomika i Predprinimatelstvo, 5-1, 162-165.
- PwC (2017). The Long View How will the global economic order change by 2050? (The World in 2050 – Summary report).
- Sherwood, M. (2015). Medium-Term Budgetary Frameworks in the EU Member States (European Commission Discussion Paper No. 021).
- UNCTAD (June 13-18, 2004). São Paulo Consensus (Document TD/410). United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
-
Impact on poverty and income inequality in Malaysia’s economic growth
Rabiul Islam ,
Ahmad Bashawir Abdul Ghani ,
Irwanshah Zainal Abidin ,
Jeya Malar Rayaiappan
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(1).2017.05
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 15, 2017 Issue #1 pp. 55-62 Views: 11267 Downloads: 5171 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯPoverty and income inequality are extreme issues that still exist in Malaysia. Any rise in poverty and income inequality definitely affect economic growth. There are many great efforts taken by the government of Malaysia to eradicate poverty and to reduce the gap of income inequality which occurs since 1970’s. The incidence of poverty and income inequality is higher in rural areas compared to urban areas. This paper is mainly to study the level of poverty and income inequality in Malaysia together with government intervention to develop Malaysia’s economic growth. The research is focused among the working people at Ipoh, Perak. In this paper, questionnaire forms are being distributed to get information regarding the issue of poverty and income inequality. It also looks into the strategies taken by the government of Malaysia to eradicate poverty and income inequality. Few recommendations are given in terms of education policy, financial aid and assistance from government and non-government organization (NGO) to upgrade the standard and quality of living among the poor and lower-income group of people.
-
Impact of inflation on economic growth: evidence from Nigeria
Anthony Olugbenga Adaramola ,
Oluwabunmi Dada
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(2).2020.01
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 17, 2020 Issue #2 pp. 1-13 Views: 8001 Downloads: 4877 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯIn an attempt to examine the influence of inflation on the growth prospects of the Nigerian economy, the study employs the autoregressive distributed lag on the selected variables, i.e. real gross domestic product (GDP), inflation rate, interest rate, exchange rate, degree of economy`s openness, money supply, and government consumption expenditures for the period 1980–2018. The study findings indicate that inflation and real exchange rate exert a significant negative impact on economic growth, while interest rate and money supply indicate a positive and significant impact on economic growth. Other variables in the model depict no influence on the economic growth of Nigeria. The causality result shows the unidirectional relationships between interest rate, exchange rate, government consumption expenditures and gross domestic product. However, inflation and the degree of openness show no causal relationship with gross domestic product. As a result, the study recommends that a more pragmatic effort is needed by the monetary authorities to target the inflation vigorously to prevent its adverse effect by ensuring a tolerable rate that would stimulate the economic growth of Nigeria.
-
Formalization of the impact of imbalances in the movement of financial resources on economic growth of countries in Central and Eastern Europe
Serhiy Kozmenko ,
Maxim Korneyev
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/afc.01(1).2017.06
Accounting and Financial Control Volume 1, 2017 Issue #1 pp. 48-58 Views: 6193 Downloads: 1332 TO CITEThe article deals with the impact of financialization on economic growth in countries of Central and Eastern Europe. It determinesthe impact of imbalances in the movement of financial resources caused by financialization on economic growth of these countries. It proves that the implementation of measures aimed at increasing the openness of the economy and maintaining solvent demand have a positive impact on economic growth of the surveyed countries in the long run. It also proves the importance of developing a set of measures of strategic nature regulating imbalances in the movement of financial resources caused by financialization.
