References
Evans D, Freund D, Dittus R, Robertson J, Henry D. The use of economic analysis as a basis for inclusion of pharmaceutical products on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. Department of Health, Housing and Community services, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, 1990
Henry D. Economic analysis as an aid to subsidisation decisions. The development of Australian Guidelines for Pharmaceuticals. PharmacoEconomics 1: 54–67, 1992
Hillman AL, Eisenberg JM, Pauly MV, Bloom BS, Glick H, et al. Avoiding bias in the conduct and reporting of cost-effectiveness research sponsored by pharmaceutical companies. New England Journal of Medicine 324: 1362–1365, 1991
Johannesson M. The Australian guidelines for subsidisation of pharmaceuticals: the road to cost-effective drug prescribing? PharmacoEconomics 2: 355–362, 1992
Mitchell A, Henry D. Potential for bias in economic analyses. New England Journal of Medicine 325: 1384, 1991
References
Henry D. Letter to the Editor. PharmacoEconomics 2: 422–424, 1992
Johannesson M. The Australian guidelines for subsidisation of pharmaceuticals: the road to cost-effective drug prescribing? PharmacoEconomics 2: 355–362, 1992
Ontario Ministry of Health. Guidelines for preparation of economic analysis to be included in submission to drug programs branch for listing in the Ontario drug benefit formulary/comparative drug index. Drug Programme Branch. Ministry of Health, Toronto, 1991
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03260130.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Henry, D.A., Johannesson, M. The Australian Guidelines for Subsidisation of Pharmaceuticals. PharmacoEconomics 2, 422–426 (1992). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199202050-00010
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199202050-00010