Abstract
Background: Major changes in the roles and responsibilities of pharmacists across the world are occurring. A new Scottish Community Pharmacy contract was introduced in April 2006, following the introduction of a similar contract in England in 2005. This contract encourages greater involvement in medicines management and other clinical cognitive roles, whilst retaining a supply function.
Objective: To use a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to examine the strength of preference of community pharmacists for existing and potential new roles, prior to the introduction of the new contract.
Study design: The DCE was a component of a larger questionnaire, which assessed demography, workload, attitudes to, and satisfaction with, proposed new roles, and current levels of activity. Attributes and levels for the DCE were based on the recent policy document for Scotland, The Right Medicine, and informed consensus, respectively. Scenarios were organised into pairs, and pharmacists were asked “Which job would you prefer?” The questionnaire was mailed to all pharmacists working in the community setting in Scotland (n = 1621), as identified from a telephone survey. The questionnaire was totally anonymous, and two reminders were sent.
Results: There was an overall response rate of 56.4% (914/1621). Community pharmacists preferred to work in an extended pharmacy team, to have strong integration with secondary care, and to provide a minor illness advice service. In 2003, they would forgo an annual income of £3443, £2183 and £2798, respectively to achieve this. However, overall, the pharmacists preferred more income to less. Repeat dispensing, chronic disease management, offering health promotion services, and the number of prescriptions dispensed per month were not significant predictors of job choice.
Conclusion: Community pharmacists placed the highest value on organisational aspects of their work, and having a first contact primary care role. Although total income was important, there were indications that they would be prepared to forgo income to attain their preferred job.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Scottish Executive. The right medicine: a strategy for pharmaceutical care in Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive, 2001
Department of Health. Pharmacy in the future: a vision for pharmacy in the new NHS. London: Department of Health, 2000
Welsh Assembly Government. Remedies for success: a strategy for pharmacy in Wales. Cardiff: Welsh Assembly Government, 2002
Bond CM, Laing A, McKee L, et al. Evolution and change in community pharmacy. Aberdeen: Community Pharmacy Research Consortium, 2003
Hassell K. Contemporary workforce patterns and historical trends: the pharmacy labour market over the last forty years. Pharm J 2002; 269 (7213): 291–296
Bond C, Scott A, Inch J, et al. Examining alternatives for the remuneration of community pharmacy: report to Scottish Pharmaceutical General Council Research Trust. Aberdeen: University of Aberdeen, 2003
Inch J, Bond C, Lee A, et al. Scottish community pharmacists’ current involvement in and attitudes towards’ extended service’ provision: a national survey. Int J Pharm Pract 2005; 13: 289–301
Ryan M, Farrar S. Eliciting preferences for health care using conjoint analysis. BMJ 2000; 320: 1530–1533
Ryan M, Gerard K. Using discrete choice experiments in health economics: moving forward. In: Scott A, Maynard A, Elliott R. Advances in health economics. Wiley: Chichester, 2002
Scott A. Eliciting GPs’ preferences for pecuniary and non-pecuniary job characteristics. J Health Econ 2001: 20; 329–347
Zwerina K, Huber J, Kuhfeld W. A general method for constructing efficient choice designs. Durham (NC): Duke University, 1996
Carlsson F, Martinsson P. Design techniques for stated preference methods in health economics. Health Econ 2003; 12: 281–294
Inch J, Bond C, Lee A, et al. Scottish Community Pharmacists’ current involvement in and attitudes towards’ extended service’ provision: a national survey. Int J Pharm Pract 2005; 13: 289–301
Rosen S. The theory of equalising differences. In: Ashenfelter O, Layard R, editors. Handbook of labour economics. Vol I. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1986: 641–692
Briggs AH, Gray AM. Handling uncertainty when performing economic evaluations of health care interventions. Health Technol Assess 1999; 3 (2): 1–134
Ratcliffe J. The use of conjoint analysis to elicit willingness to pay: proceed with caution? Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2000; 16: 270–290
Skjoldborg US, Gyrd-Hansen D. Conjoint analysis: the cost variable. An Achilles’ heel? Health Econ 2003; 12: 479–492
Lancsar E, Savage E. Deriving welfare measures from discrete choice experiments: inconsistency between current methods and random utility and welfare theory. Health Econ Lett 2004; 13: 901–907
Lancsar E, Savage E. Deriving welfare measures from discrete choice experiments: a response to Ryan and Santos Silva. Health Econ Lett 2004; 13: 919–924
Ryan M. Deriving welfare measures in discrete choice experiments: a comment to Lancsar and Savage (1). Health Econ Lett 2004; 13: 909–912
Santos Silva JMC. Deriving welfare measures in discrete choice experiments: a comment to Lancsar and Savage (2). Health Econ Lett 2004; 13: 913–918
Scott A. Identifying and analysing dominant preferences in discrete choice experiments: an application in health care. J Econom Psyc 2002; 23: 383–398
Lloyd AJ. Threats to the estimation of benefit: are preference elicitation methods accurate? Health Econ 2003; 12: 393–402
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by the Scottish Pharmaceutical General Council (SPGC) Research Trust. The research was conducted whilst Anthony Scott was at the Health Economics Research Unit (HERN). HERN is funded by the Chief Scientists Office of the Scottish Executive Health Department. The authors thank Verity Watson for assistance with the design of the experiment and two anonymous referees for helpful comments. The views in this paper are those of the authors and not the SPGC or the Scottish Executive. Christine Bond has received two separate unrestricted research grants from the SPGC. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scott, A., Bond, C., Inch, J. et al. Preferences of Community Pharmacists for Extended Roles in Primary Care. Pharmacoeconomics 25, 783–792 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200725090-00006
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200725090-00006