Skip to main content
Log in

Cationic Antimicrobial Peptides

Issues for Potential Clinical Use

  • Drug Development
  • Published:
BioDrugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many different types of organisms use antimicrobial peptides, typically 20–40 amino acids in length, for defence against infection. Most are capable of rapidly killing a wide range of microbial cells. They have been classified according to their active structures into six extensive groups. It is not yet clear how these peptides kill bacterial cells, but it is widely believed that some cationic antimicrobial peptides kill by disrupting bacterial membranes, allowing the free exchange of intra- and extra-cellular ions. The selectivity of these peptides appears to relate to differences between the external membranes of prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. The action of the peptides may involve the formation of ‘barrel-stave’ or ‘torroidal’ pores, the introduction of packing defects in the membrane phospholipids, or large-scale disruption of the membrane by a very dense aggregation of parallel-oriented peptide, called the ‘carpet mechanism’.

Antimicrobial peptides are attractive candidates for clinical development because of their selectivity, their speed of action and because bacteria may not easily develop resistance against them. Some antimicrobial peptides are already in clinical and commercial use, including ambicin (nisin), polymixin B and gramicidin S. There have been several attempts at developing peptides to make them more suitable for clinical use. For those peptides that act against bacterial membranes, it is possible to differentiate between those structural features that contribute to the specificity of initial membrane binding and those that contribute to the subsequent breach of membrane integrity. The design of novel antimicrobial peptides would necessitate the optimisation of multiple parameters, a problem that has proved difficult to solve.

Potential problems to be overcome include high production costs, toxicity against eukaryotic cells, susceptibility to proteolytic degradation and the development of allergies to the peptides. Biosynthesis, using recombinant DNA techniques, could make commercial-scale synthesis feasible but the peptides are usually lethal to the micro-organisms used to produce them. Proteolytic degradation can be reduced by modifying the peptides to contain nonstandard amino acids, or by restricting the use of peptides to topical applications. The problem of sensitisation could be overcome by the use of our own natural antibiotics to prevent or treat infections.

Despite early hopes that bacteria would not easily develop resistance to antimicrobial peptides, it is clear that some strains of bacteria already have.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Epand RM, Vogel HJ. Diversity of antimicrobial peptides and their mechanisms of action. Biochim Biophys Acta 1999; 1462: 11–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Peptaibol database [online]. Available from URL: http://www.public-1.cryst.bbk.ac.uk/peptaibol/welcome.html [Accessed 2003 Jun 12]

  3. Zasloff M. Magainins, a class of antimicrobial peptides from Xenopus skin: isolation, characterization of two active forms, and partial cDNA sequence of a precursor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1987; 84: 5549–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Antimicrobial Sequences database [online]. Available from URL: http://bbc-ml.univ.trieste.it/~tossi/pagl.html [Accessed 2003 Jun 12]

  5. Huang HW. Action of antimicrobial peptides: two-state model. Biochemistry 2000; 39: 8347–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ludtke SJ, He K, Wu Y, et al. Cooperative membrane insertion of magainin correlated with its cytolytic activity. Biochim Biophys Acta 1994; 1190: 181–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Oren Z, Shai Y. Mode of action of linear amphipathic alpha-helical antimicrobial peptides. Biopolymers 1998; 47: 451–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Vunnam S, Juvvadi P, Merrifield RB. Synthesis and antibacterial action of cecropin and proline-arginine-rich peptides from pig intestine. J Pept Res 1997; 49: 59–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hancock REW, Rozek A. Role of membranes in the activities of antimicrobial cationic peptides. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2002; 206: 143–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Heller WT, Waring AJ, Lehrer RL, et al. Multiple states of beta-sheet peptide protegrin in lipid bilayers. Biochemistry 1998; 37: 17331–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Matsuzaki K, Yoneyama S, Fujii N, et al. Membrane permeabilization mechanisms of a cyclic antimicrobial peptide, tachyplesin I, and its linear analog. Biochemistry 1997; 36: 9799–806

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cornet B, Bonmatin JM, Hetru C, et al. Refined 3-dimensional solution structure of insect defensin-A. Structure 1995; 3: 435–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kondejewski LH, Farmer SW, Wishhart D, et al. Modulation of structure and antibacterial and hemolytic activity by ring size in cyclic gramicidin S analogs. J Biol Chem 1996; 271: 25261–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Märki F, Hänni E, Fredenhagen A, et al. Mode of action of the lanthionine-containing peptide antibiotics duramycin, duramycin-B and duramycin-C, and cinnamycin as indirect inhibitors of phospholipase-A2. Biochem Pharmacol 1991; 42: 2027–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Thomas CJ, Surolia A. Kinetics of the interaction of endotoxin with polymyxin B and its analogs: a surface plasmon resonance analysis. FEBS Lett 1999; 445: 420–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Vaara MJ. Increased outer-membrane resistance to ethylenediaminetetraacetate and cations in novel lipid A mutants. J Bacteriol 1981; 148: 426–34

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Heiander IM, Kilpelainen I, Vaara M. Phosphate groups in lipopolysaccharides of Salmonella typhimurium rfaP mutants. FEBS Lett 1997; 409(3): 457–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Guo L, Lim KB, Gunn JS, et al. Regulation of lipid A modifications by Salmonella typhimurium virulence genes phoP-phoQ. Science 1997; 276: 250–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hirakura Y, Kobayashi S, Matsuzaki K. Specific interactions of the antimicrobial peptidecyclic beta-sheet tachyplesin I with lipopolysaccharides. Biochim Biophys Acta 2002; 1562: 32–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ruhr E, Sahl HG. Mode of action of the peptide antibiotic nisin and influence on the membrane potential of whole cells and on cytoplasmic and artificial membrane vesicles. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1985; 27: 841–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kazan K, Marcus JP, Goulter KC, et al. Application of genes encoding antimicrobial peptides for the control of fungal pathogens of canola [online]. Available from URL: http://www.regional.org.aU/au/gcirc/4/508.htm [Accessed 2003 Jun 12]

  22. Dathe M, Wieprecht T. Structural features of helical antimicrobial peptides: their potential to modulate activity on model membranes and biological cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1999; 1462: 71–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kondejewski LH, Jelokhani-Niaraki M, Farmer SW, et al. Dissociation of antimicrobial and hemolytic activities in cyclic peptide diastereomers by systematic alterations in amphipathicity. J Biol Chem 1999; 274: 13181–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Micrologix Biotech Inc. [online]. Available from URL: http://www.mbiotech.com [Accessed 2003 Jun 12]

  25. IntraBiotics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [online]. Available from URL: http://www.intrabiotics.com/news/index.html [Accessed 2003 Jun 12]

  26. Chen J, Falla TJ, Liu H, et al. Development of protegrins for the treatment and prevention of oral mucositis: structure-activity relationships of synthetic protegrin analogues. Biopolymers 2000; 55: 88–98

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Genaera Corporation [online]. Available from URL: http://www.genaera.com/infectiousdisease.html [Accessed 2003 Jun 12]

  28. Izumiya N, Kato T, Aoyaga H, et al. Synthetic aspects of biologically active cyclic peptides: gramicidin S and tyrocidines. New York: Halstead Press, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gellman SH. Beta-amino acid oligomers with magainin-like activity [abstract]. Biophys J 2001; 80: 2d

    Google Scholar 

  30. Johnson DA, Yeh CK, Dodds MWJ. Effect of donor age on the concentrations of histatins in human parotid and submandibular/sublingual saliva. Arch Oral Biol 2000; 45: 731–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Schröder J-M. Clinical significance of epithelial peptide antibiotics. BioDrugs 1999; 11: 293–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Groisman EA, Parra-Lopez C, Salcedo M, et al. Resistance to host microbial peptides is necessary for Salmonella virulence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992; 89: 11939–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Guo L, Lim KB, Poduje CM, et al. Lipid A acylation and bacterial resistance against vertebrate antimicrobial peptides. Cell 1998; 95: 189–98

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Banemann A, Deppisch H, Gross R. The lipopolysaccharide of Bordetella bronchiseptica acts as a protective shield against antimicrobial peptides. Infect Immun 1998; 66: 5607–12

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author has provided no information on sources of funding or on conflicts of interest directly relevant to the content of this review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeremy P. Bradshaw.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bradshaw, J.P. Cationic Antimicrobial Peptides. BioDrugs 17, 233–240 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2165/00063030-200317040-00002

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00063030-200317040-00002

Keywords

Navigation