Skip to main content
Log in

Drug Fever

A Descriptive Cohort Study from the French National Pharmacovigilance Database

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Drug Safety Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Although known as a rare adverse drug reaction (ADR), drug fever (DF) remains an important issue in medicine, with the risk of leading to inappropriate and potentially harmful diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. Only sparse data regarding DF have been published.

Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate which drugs were associated with DF, and report outcomes.

Methods: Cases of DF without skin reactions were selected from all ADRs reported from 1986 to 2007 in the French National Pharmacovigilance Database. Drugs potentially responsible for DF were assessed using a qualitative case-by-case analysis (Naranjo’s criteria) and quantitative measurement (proportional reporting ratio [PRR]). A drug was implicated as the cause of DF when the following criteria were validated: three or more cases and PRR of at least two with a Chi-squared value of at least four.

Results: A total of 167 DF cases involving 115 drugs were eligible. Based on the PRR, 22 drugs were significantly associated with DF. Antibacterials represented the most frequently reported drugs, including amikacin (PRR 39.6 [95% CI 23.6, 69.0], oxacillin (9.1 [3.6, 23.4]), cefotaxime (5.5 [2.0, 15.3]), ceftriaxone (5.4 [2.6, 11.3]), rifampicin (4.0 [1.8, 9.2]), vancomycin (4.0 [1.4, 11.5]), ciprofloxacin (3.1 [1.2, 8.0]), isoniazid (3.9 [1.4, 11.4]), pristinamycin (3.1 [1.0, 9.1]) and cotrimoxazole (2.6 [1.2, 5.8]). Median time [interquartile range] from drug administration to fever onset was 2 days [1.0–10.5]. A diagnosis of DF was made following cessation of the suspected drugs (3 days [1.0–11.5] after fever onset. Drug rechallenge was performed (38.0%), resulting in recurrence of DF in all cases. DF resulted in life-threatening events (0.6%), hospitalization or prolonged hospital stay (24.5%) and persistent disability (0.6%). Final outcome was favourable in 96.9% of cases after drug discontinuation.

Conclusion: Diagnosing DF is challenging. Based on this large series, antibacterials remain the major class of drugs responsible for DF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Table II
Fig 1
Table III
Table IV
Fig

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mackowiak PA, Le Maistre CF. Drug fever: a critical appraisal of conventional concepts. An analysis of 51 epi sodes in two Dallas hospitals and 97 episodes reported in the English literature. Ann Intern Med 1987; 106: 728–33

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Johnson DH, Cunha BA. Drug fever. Infect Dis Clin North Am 1996 Mar; 10: 85–91

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Classen DC, Pestotnik SL, Evans RS, et al. Adverse drug events in hospitalized patients: excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality. JAMA 1997; 277: 301–6

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kumar KL, Reuler JB. Drug fever. West J Med 1986; 144: 753–5

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Lipsky BA, Hirschmann JV. Drug fever. JAMA 1981; 245: 851–4

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Young EJ, Fainstein V, Musher DM. Drug-induced fever: cases seen in the evaluation of unexplained fever in a general hospital population. Rev Infect Dis 1982; 4: 69–77

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tabor PA. Drug-induced fever. Drug Intell Clin Pharm 1986; 20: 413–20

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Patel RA, Gallagher JC. Drug fever. Pharmacotherapy 2010; 30: 57–69

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Oizumi K, Onuma K, Watanabe A, et al. Clinical study of drug fever induced by parenteral administration of antibiotics. Tohoku J Exp Med 1989; 159: 45–56

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tisdale J, Miller D. Drug induced disease: prevention, detection, management. Bethesda (MD): American Society of Health System Pharmacists, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  11. Evans SJ, Waller PC, Davis S. Use of proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) for signal generation from spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2001; 10:483–6

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thiessard F, Roux E, Miremont-Salamé G, et al. Trends in spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports to the French pharmacovigilance system (1986–2001). Drug Saf 2005; 28: 731–40

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bégaud B, Martin K, Haramburu F, et al. Rates of spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions in France [letter]. JAMA 2002; 288: 1588

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pleasants RA, Walker TR, Samuelson WM. Allergic reactions to parenteral beta-lactam antibiotics in patients with cystic fibrosis. Chest 1994; 106: 1124–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wood K, On behalf of the MedDRA Working Party. The medical dictionary for drug regulatory affairs (MedDRA). Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 1994; 3: 7–13

    Google Scholar 

  16. World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Drug Statistics Methodology. ATC/DDD index 2012 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_index/ [Accessed 2012 Jun 26]

  17. Naranjo CA, Busto U, Sellers EM, et al. A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1981; 30: 239–45

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. World Health Organization. International classification of diseases and related health problems 10th revision, 2007 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/ [Accessed 2012 Jun 26]

  19. CIOMS. Basic requirements for the use of terms for reporting adverse drug reactions. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 1992; 1:39–45

    Google Scholar 

  20. Almenoff J, Tonning JM, Gould AL, et al. Perspectives on the use of data mining in pharmacovigilance. Drug Saf 2005; 28: 981–1007

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Evans SJ. Pharmacovigilance: a science or fielding emergencies? Stat Med 2000; 19: 3199–209

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Barbado FJ, Gómez-Cerezo J, Peña JM, et al. Fever of unknown origin: classic and associated with human immunodeficiency virus infection. a comparative study. J Med 2001; 32: 152–62

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Barbado FJ, Vazquez JJ, Pena JM, et al. Fever of unknown origin: a survey on 133 patients. J Med 1984; 15: 185–92

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Colpan A, Onguru P, Erbay A, et al. Fever of unknown origin: analysis of 71 consecutive cases. Am J Med Sci 2007; 334: 92–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. de Kleijn EM, Vandenbroucke JP, van der Meer JW. Fever of unknown origin (FUO): I. A prospective multicenter study of 167 patients with FUO, using fixed epidemiologic entry criteria. The Netherlands FUO Study Group. Medi cine (Baltimore) 1997; 76: 392–400

    Google Scholar 

  26. Erten N, Saka B, Ozturk G, et al. Fever of unknown origin: a report of 57 cases. Int J Clin Pract 2005; 59: 958–60

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kazanjian PH. Fever of unknown origin: review of 86 patients treated in community hospitals. Clin Infect Dis 1992; 15: 968–73

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Knockaert DC, Vanneste LJ, Vanneste SB, et al. Fever of unknown origin in the 1980s: an update of the diagnostic spectrum. Arch Intern Med 1992 Jan; 152: 51–5

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Knockaert DC, Vanderschueren S, Blockmans D. Fever of unknown origin in adults: 40 years on. J Intern Med 2003 Mar; 253: 263–75

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Larson EB, Featherstone HJ, Petersdorf RG. Fever of un determined origin: diagnosis and follow-up of 105 cases, 1970–1980. Medicine (Baltimore) 1982; 61: 269–92

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu K-S, Sheng W-H, Chen Y-C, et al. Fever of unknown origin: a retrospective study of 78 adult patients in Taiwan. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2003; 36: 243–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Petersdorf RG, Beeson PB. Fever of unexplained origin:report on 100 cases. Medicine (Baltimore) 1961; 40: 1–30

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Saltoglu N, Tasova Y, Midikli D, et al. Fever of unknown origin in Turkey: evaluation of 87 cases during a nine-year-period of study. J Infect 2004; 48: 81–5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tabak F, Mert A, Celik AD, et al. Fever of unknown origin in Turkey. Infection 2003; 31: 417–20

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Zenone T. Fever of unknown origin in adults: evaluation of 144 cases in a non-university hospital. Scand J Infect Dis 2006; 38: 632–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Roush MK, Nelson KM. Understanding drug-induced febrile reactions. Am Pharm 1993; NS33(10): 39–42

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Harris LF, Holdsambeck HK. Drug fever: surprisingly common and costly. Ala Med 1986; 56: 19–22

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Grépinet C, Guillocheau E, Berteloot A, et al. Drug-induced fever during treatment with levofloxacin: a case-report [in French]. Therapie 2008; 63: 341–3

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sprague JE, Banks ML, Cook VJ, et al. Hypothalamicpituitary-thyroid axis and sympathetic nervous system in volvement in hyperthermia induced by 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (ecstasy). J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2003; 305: 159–66

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Elting LS, Rubenstein EB, Kurtin D, et al. Mississippi mud in the 1990s: risks and outcomes of vancomycin-associated toxicity in general oncology practice. Cancer 1998; 83: 2597–607

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Bailie GR, Neal D. Vancomycin ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity: a review. Med Toxicol Adverse Drug Exp 1988; 3: 376–86

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Darko W, Medicis JJ, Smith A, et al. Mississippi mud no more: cost-effectiveness of pharmacokinetic dosage adjustment of vancomycin to prevent nephrotoxicity. Pharmacotherapy 2003; 23: 643–50

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hazell L, Shakir SAW. Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions: a systematic review. Drug Saf 2006; 29: 385–96

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Mannesse CK, van Puijenbroek EP, Jansen PAF, et al. Hyponatraemia as an adverse drug reaction of antipsychotic drugs: a case-control study in VigiBase. Drug Saf 2010; 33: 569–78

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Poluzzi E, Raschi E, Motola D, et al. Antimicrobials and the risk of torsades de pointes: the contribution from data mining of the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System. Drug Saf 2010; 33: 303–14

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Strandell J, Bate A, Hägg S, et al. Rhabdomyolysis a result of azithromycin and statins: an unrecognized interaction. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2009; 68: 427–34

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

No sources of funding were used to conduct this study or prepare this manuscript. None of the authors has any conflict of interest.

The authors would like to acknowledge Jenny Lu, MD, from Toxikon Consortium, Chicago, IL, USA, for her review of this manuscript and François Maignen, from the European Medicines Agency, London, UK, for his methodological help. We appreciate the assistance of the French pharmacovigilance centers in our work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vodovar, D., LeBeller, C., Mégarbane, B. et al. Drug Fever. Drug Saf 35, 759–767 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03261972

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03261972

Keywords

Navigation