초록

In recent years, National Assembly and the Ministry of Justice has been working on the revision of the Criminal Procedure Code. Relations agencies in favor of their own to the revision are actively involved. Study of the Criminal Procedure Code so that these institutions are involved in the study concerns the flows are becoming a reality. Theory of the Criminal Procedure Law and the interpretation of the legislation and practices through demonstration is to show the direction of. Amendments to the Criminal Procedure Code in such a teaching and research groups are excluded while the Outsider is like. Law enforcement agencies and courts in criminal investigations and court proceedings, is nestled into a great pillar. So how to interpret the Criminal Procedure Code and the legislative organs, depending on the course of the proceedings of the phase and convenience will be different. Criminal Procedure Code had to take the castle that is not political in nature. Nevertheless, the human rights of criminals over the realization of democratic ideas and values , and the realization of justice should not be ignored, the point is clear. Nevertheless, judicial reform or the introduction of advanced criminal justice system as a justification for the ongoing revision process of the Criminal Procedure Code and look at the contents of the discussion, really criminal law had been sought by scholars until now have been reflected in values and ideology is suspect. Through the revision of the Criminal Procedure Act, each institution that they have more power or strength and I are trying to do, if not free, no longer a theoretical study of the Criminal Procedure Code can not be considered as law. Not only academic research scientists in various forms of social engagement have changed in a positive and realistic. According to subjective and academic research results to them in their own voice, pay, through this process has been developed for social and academic. Nevertheless, through the theory and implementation realities involved to satisfy the emotional staying power, the Polifessor type or Snoopyfessor to see that there is always the risk of falling. Institute of Criminal Law and also gets us to the center to pay their own voices,and the Society now brought into the discussion will be followed. Although the Ministry of Justice's Criminal Procedure Code amendments are submitted to the National Society's opinion, even if presented in the National Assembly, led by the Ministry of Justice and the Criminal Procedure Code that indicates the direction of the comments about the look is desirable. In addition, the Criminal Procedure Code and the Criminal Justice Institute, and the discussion of amendments to the Criminal Law Association takes over the discussion, led by the direction and content of legislation to do so will be identified.

키워드

사법개혁, 형사소송법, 사법제도개혁특별위원회, 제17차 개정 형사소송법,형법 개정

참고문헌(22)open

  1. [학술지] 강동범 / 2009 / 구속영장재판에 대한 불복 가부 / 형사법연구 21 (3) : 81 ~ 104

  2. [학술지] 김봉수 / 2010 / 피고인의 공소사실과 관련한 공동피고인에 대한 경찰작성 신문조서의 증거능력 -왜 제312조 ‘제4항’이 아니라 ‘제3항’을 적용하는가?- / 형사법연구 22 (1) : 73 ~ 96

  3. [학술지] 김재봉 / 2007 / 개정 형사소송법과 수임판사의 재판에 대한 불복 / 형사법연구 19 (4) : 37 ~ 62

  4. [학술지] 김태명 / 2010 / 다시 개정되어야 할 재정신청제도 / 형사정책연구 21 (2) : 83 ~ 133

  5. [학술지] 박노섭 / 2008 / 유죄협상제도 도입 가능성에 대한 연구 / 형사법연구 20 (1) : 115 ~ 135

  6. [학술지] 박용철 / 2010 / 진술거부권 불고지에 대한 소송법적 문제 / 형사법연구 22 (1) : 97 ~ 124

  7. [학술지] 변종필 / 2010 / 간이절차와 유죄협상 / 비교형사법연구 12 (2) : 183 ~ 216

  8. [학술지] 서보학 / 2009 / 참고인 강제구인제도에 대한 비판적 고찰 / 형사법연구 21 (3) : 57 ~ 80

  9. [학술지] 서보학 / 2010 / 검사독점적 영장청구제도에 대한 비판과 입법론적 대안 / 비교형사법연구 12 (1) : 275 ~ 306

  10. [학술지] 윤동호 / 2009 / 플리바게닝(Plea Bargaining) 도입론 비판 / 형사법연구 21 (3) : 3 ~ 22

  11. [학술지] 윤종행 / 2007 / 적법절차를 따르지 아니하고 수집한 압수물의 증거능력 - 대판 2007. 11. 15, 2007도3061() 공직선거법위반 - / 형사법연구 19 (4) : 329 ~ 354

  12. [학술지] 이승호 / 2007 / 개정 형사소송법상 전문증거(傳聞證據)의 증거가치에 대한 검토 / 형사법연구 19 (4) : 199 ~ 224

  13. [학술지] 이완규 / 2007 / 개정 형사소송법상 조서와 영상녹화물 / 비교형사법연구 9 (2) : 143 ~ 196

  14. [학술대회] 이호중 / 2010 / 공판 분야의 개정방안 / 2010년 공동학술회의 발표자료집

  15. [학술지] 조기영 / 2008 / 재정신청절차의 해석론적 쟁점 / 형사법연구 20 (1) : 137 ~ 165

  16. [학술지] 차정인 / 2007 / 개정 형사소송법상의 증거조사 / 형사법연구 19 (4) : 111 ~ 156

  17. [학술지] 천진호 / 2009 / 수사과정에서의 영상녹화제도의 합리적 운용방향 - 입법연혁적 논의를 중심으로 - / 비교형사법연구 11 (1) : 279 ~ 300

  18. [학술지] 최석윤 / 2008 / 법이 정한 절차에 따르지 아니하고 수집된 압수물의 증거능력 / 형사법연구 20 (1) : 259 ~ 280

  19. [학술지] 하태인 / 2011 / 수사상 긴급체포 요건과 운용 / 형사법연구 23 (1) : 285 ~ 308

  20. [학술지] 하태훈 / 2011 / 한국형사법학회 형사소송법 개정안에 대한 논평 - 수사 일반과 강제처분 부분 - / 형사법연구 23 (1) : 3 ~ 26

  21. [학술지] 한상훈 / 2009 / 형사소송의 구조와 검사, 피고인의 지위 - 당사자주의와 증거개시제도를 중심으로 - / 형사법연구 21 (4) : 397 ~ 428

  22. [학술지] 황태정 / 2010 / 개정 형사소송법상 공판준비절차 / 비교형사법연구 12 (2) : 93 ~ 124