Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research
Date Submitted: Dec 2, 2020
Date Accepted: May 31, 2021
Associations between methods of meeting sexual partners and sexual practice among heterosexuals: a cross-sectional study in Melbourne, Australia
ABSTRACT
Background:
The association between meeting partners online and sexual practices has been under-studied in heterosexuals.
Objective:
This study examined the associations between the methods of meeting partners with sexual practices and HIV/STIs in heterosexuals.
Methods:
We conducted a survey among heterosexuals attending Melbourne Sexual Health Centre in 2019. This survey asked about the methods through which participants met their sexual partner(s), sexual practices and intravenous drug use (IVDU) over the past 3 months. Participants’ HIV/STI (chlamydia, gonorrhoea, syphilis) status was obtained from clinical testing. A multivariable logistic regression examined the association between each method of meeting and the participants’ sexual practices, IVDU, and STI status.
Results:
A total of 698 participants (325 males, 373 females) were included in the study. The majority of participants reported using only one method to meet partners (68.3% males, 65.7% females, p=0.046). Males most commonly met partners at social-venues (e.g. bar, pub, party) (38.8%, n=126), whilst females most commonly met through friends/family (47.7%, n=178). Paying for sex was associated with males meeting partners at sex-venues (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=145.34, 95%CI: 26.13-808.51) and the internet (AOR=10.00, 95%CI: 3.61-27.55). There was no association between IVDU and methods of meeting. Social-venues were associated with condomless vaginal sex in males (AOR=3.31, 95%CI: 1.94-5.71) and females (AOR=2.58, 95%CI: 1.61-4.13) and testing STI positive in males (AOR=3.04, 95%CI: 1.24-7.48) and females (AOR=3.75, 95%CI: 1.58-8.89).
Conclusions:
Heterosexuals that met partners at social-venues had a more than threefold risk of testing positive for STIs, indicating that heterosexuals may benefit from health promotion campaigns that are delivered through a public setting.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.