Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter March 14, 2005

A Practitioner's Guide to Lag Order Selection For VAR Impulse Response Analysis

  • Ventzislav Ivanov and Lutz Kilian

It is common in empirical macroeconomics to fit vector autoregressive (VAR) models to construct estimates of impulse responses. An important preliminary step in impulse response analysis is the selection of the VAR lag order. In this paper, we compare the six lag-order selection criteria most commonly used in applied work. Our metric is the mean-squared error (MSE) of the implied pointwise impulse response estimates normalized relative to their MSE based on knowing the true lag order. Based on our simulation design we conclude that for monthly VAR models, the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) tends to produce the most accurate structural and semi-structural impulse response estimates for realistic sample sizes. For quarterly VAR models, the Hannan-Quinn Criterion (HQC) appears to be the most accurate criterion with the exception of sample sizes smaller than 120, for which the Schwarz Information Criterion (SIC) is more accurate. For persistence profiles based on quarterly vector error correction models with known cointegrating vector, our results suggest that the SIC is the most accurate criterion for all realistic sample sizes.

Published Online: 2005-3-14

©2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 5.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.2202/1558-3708.1219/html
Scroll to top button