تجزیه و تحلیل پایداری زیست‌محیطی محلات شهر همدان براساس مقایسۀ روش‌های تصمیم‌گیری چندمعیاره و دیدگاه ساکنین

نوع مقاله : مقالات مستقل پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه علوم محیط زیست دانشکده علوم دریایی و محیطی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران

2 گروه جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، دانشگاه آزاد واحد سمنان

3 گروه علوم محیط زیست دانشگاه مازندران

چکیده

پایداری محیط و کیفیت محیط شهری یکی از مسائل شهری است که به دلیل اینکه به‌صورت جدی با زندگی ساکنین در ارتباط است، مورد توجه محققین قرار گرفته است. هدف از این پژوهش ارزیابی و اولویت‌بندی پایداری زیست‌محیطی در محلات شهری همدان است. ابتدا به روش نمونه گیری خوشه‌ای و سپس تصادفی ساده 8 محله انتخاب گردید تا خانوارهای ساکن در این محلات به عنوان افراد آزمودنی انتخاب شوند. حجم نمونه با استفاده از روش کوکران برابر با 368 نفر بود. ابزار اندازه‌گیری پایداری زیست‌محیطی، شامل 12 معیار و 71 گویه بود. تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها با استفاده از نرم افزار SPSS و GIS انجام شد. برای پایداری زیست‌محیطی محلات از 12 معیار اصلی استفاده شد. با توجه به پرسش‌نامۀ ساکنین، میزان توجه و اهمیت زیرمعیارها مشخص شد. با استفاده از روش‌های AHP و ANP  میزان اهمیت معیارها مشخص گردید و براساس آن معیارهای کیفیت مکان، آزردگی ناشی از حجم ترافیک، چالش‌های زیست‌محیطی و اقدامات حفاظتی مصرف آب چهار معیار مهم بودند. با توجه به تحلیل صورت گرفته آزمون T تک نمونه‌ای مشخص شد که شاخص‌های اقدامات حفاظتی مصرف آب، رضایتمندی از شاخص تحرک و دسترسی، آزردگی ناشی از حجم ترافیک، نارضایتی از صدا و چالش‌های زیست‌محیطی در محلات شهر همدان مطلوب نیستند. نقشۀ پایداری محلات شهر همدان براساس معیارهای مورد استفاده، روش‌های AHP و ANP و آنالیزهای GIS تهیه شد. نتایج نشان داد که با استفاده از هر دو روش محلات پایدار و ناپایدار مشترک هستند (در برخی موارد تفاوت رتبه وجود دارد) که این نشان می‌دهد شهر همدان از لحاظ پایداری چندان پایدار نیست چرا که فاصلۀ محلات پایدار و ناپایدار از سایر محلات زیاد است. از لحاظ فضایی، محلات با پایداری بسیار بالا عموماً در جنوب شهر قرار گرفتند. محلات بلوار ارم و بوستان ارم دارای بالاترین پایداری و محلات قلیانی و چاپارخانه دارای پایین‌ترین پایداری هستند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Analyzing the Environmental Sustainability of Hamedan City Neighborhoods Based on the Comparison of Multi-criteria Decision-making Methods and Residents' Views

نویسندگان [English]

  • mohammad rahmani 1
  • komeil abdi 2
  • ahmad mohammadi 3
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran
2 Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Azad University of Semnan
3 Department of Environmental Sciences, Mazandaran University
چکیده [English]

The sustainability of the environment and the quality of the urban environment is one of the issues that have received the attention of researchers because it is seriously related to the residents’ lives. The purpose of this research is to evaluate and prioritize environmental sustainability in the urban areas of Hamadan. First, eight neighborhoods were selected by cluster sampling and then by simple random sampling, the households living in these neighborhoods were selected as subjects. The sample size using Cochran's method was equal to 368 people. The instrument for measuring environmental sustainability included 12 criteria and 71 items. Data analysis was done using SPSS and GIS software. The 12 main criteria were used for the environmental sustainability of localities. The level of attention and importance of the sub-criteria was determined according to the residents' questionnaire. Using AHP and ANP methods, the importance of the criteria was determined and based on that criteria, quality of place, annoyance caused by traffic volume, environmental challenges, and protective measures of water consumption were considered the four important criteria. According to the analysis of the T single-sample, it was found that the indicators of water consumption protection measures, satisfaction with the mobility and accessibility index, annoyance caused by the volume of traffic, dissatisfaction with noise, and environmental challenges in Hamedan city are not favorable. Hamedan neighborhood sustainability map was prepared based on the criteria used, AHP and ANP methods, and GIS analysis. Findings revealed that Hamadan City is not very stable in terms of sustainability. The results also demonstrated that by using both methods, stable and unstable neighborhoods are the same (in some cases, there is a difference in rank), which shows that Hamadan city is not very stable in terms of sustainability, because the distance between stable and unstable neighborhoods is large. Eram Boulevard and Eram Bostan neighborhoods had the highest stability while Qalani and Chaparkhaneh neighborhoods had the lowest stability.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Environmental sustainability
  • urban areas
  • quality of life
  • GIS
  • Hamadan city

مراجع

Alborz, A. (2017). The nature of quality of life: A conceptual model to inform assessment. Journal of policy and practice in intellectual disabilities, 14(1), 15-30.
Ameen, R. F. M., & Mourshed, M. (2019). Urban sustainability assessment framework development: The ranking and weighting of sustainability indicators using analytic hierarchy process. Sustainable Cities and Society, 44, 356-366.
Chaokromthong, K., & Sintao, N. (2021). Sample size estimation using Yamane and Cochran and Krejcie and Morgan and green formulas and Cohen statistical power analysis by G* Power and comparisions. Apheit International Journal, 10(2), 76-86.
El Din, H. S., Shalaby, A., Farouh, H. E., & Elariane, S. A. (2013). Principles of urban quality of life for a neighborhood. HBRC journal, 9(1), 86-92.
Feroz, A. K., Zo, H., & Chiravuri, A. (2021). Digital transformation and environmental sustainability: A review and research agenda. Sustainability, 13(3), 1530.
Gavrilidis, A. A., Ciocănea, C. M., Niţă, M. R., Onose, D. A., & Năstase, I. I. (2016). Urban landscape quality index–planning tool for evaluating urban landscapes and improving the quality of life. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 32, 155-167.
Haghi, Y., Ali Babalo, L., Ansari Gabli, A., & Karmi, S. (2022). Investigating and analyzing the status of urban quality indicators from the perspective of citizens (Case study: Garmi city). Geography and Human Relationships, 4(4), 111-122.
Hajibabaei, S., Ziari, K., & Zakerhaghighi, K. (2022). Measuring the Effective Variables on Urban Expansion and Physical Development Simulation of Hamadan City Using Integrated Model of Cellular automata, Logistic Regression and Markov Chain. Journal of Studies of Human Settlements Planning, 17(1), 49-62.
Hickel, J., & Kallis, G. (2020). Is green growth possible?. New political economy, 25(4), 469-486.
Jarah, S. H. A., Zhou, B., Abdullah, R. J., Lu, Y., & Yu, W. (2019). Urbanization and urban sprawl issues in city structure: A case of the Sulaymaniah Iraqi Kurdistan Region. Sustainability, 11(2), 485.
Kaklauskas, A., Herrera-Viedma, E., Echenique, V., Zavadskas, E. K., Ubarte, I., Mostert, A., ... & Podviezko, A. (2018). Multiple criteria analysis of environmental sustainability and quality of life in post-Soviet states. Ecological indicators, 89, 781-807.
Kaswan, V., Choudhary, M., Kumar, P., Kaswan, S., & Bajya, P. (2019). Green production strategies. Encyclopedia of Food Security and Sustainability; Ferranti, P., Berry, E., Jock, A., Eds, 492-500.
Kazemiyeh, F., & Eidi, A. (2022). Assessing the Environmental Sustainability of Tourism in the Target Villages of East Azerbaijan Province. Tourism Management, 17(58), 101-131.
Klopp, J. M., & Petretta, D. L. (2017). The urban sustainable development goal: Indicators, complexity and the politics of measuring cities. Cities, 63, 92-97.
Krellenberg, K., Bergsträßer, H., Bykova, D., Kress, N., & Tyndall, K. (2019). Urban sustainability strategies guided by the SDGs—A tale of four cities. Sustainability, 11(4), 1116.
Kumar, S., Raut, R. D., Nayal, K., Kraus, S., Yadav, V. S., & Narkhede, B. E. (2021). To identify industry 4.0 and circular economy adoption barriers in the agriculture supply chain by using ISM-ANP. Journal of Cleaner Production, 293, 126023.
Luo, M., & Lau, N. C. (2018). Increasing heat stress in urban areas of eastern China: Acceleration by urbanization. Geophysical Research Letters, 45(23), 13-060.
Maleki, M., Asadi, M., Naghadehi, S. Z., Khosravi, A., Wang, J., Stewart, I. D., & Shakeryari, M. (2023). Detecting local climate zone change and its effects on PM10 distribution using fuzzy machine learning in Tehran, Iran. Urban Climate, 49, 101506.
Maleki, M., Rahmati, M., Sadidi, J., & Babaee, E. (2014, November). Landslide risk zonation using AHP method and GIS in Malaverd catchment, Kermanshah, Iran. In International Conference on Geospatial Information Research (GI Research 2014) (pp. 15-17).
Maleki, M., Tavakkoli Sabour, S. M., Zeaieanfirouzabadi, P., & Raeisi, M. (2018). Comparison of optic and radar data for terrain feature extraction. Journal of RS and GIS for Natural Resources, 9(2), 93-107.
Moore, M., Gould, P., & Keary, B. S. (2003). Global urbanization and impact on health. International journal of hygiene and environmental health, 206(4-5), 269-278.
Nadali, A., Rahmani, A., Asgari, G., Leili, M., Norouzi, H. A., & Naghibi, A. (2019). The assessment of trihalomethanes concentrations in drinking water of Hamadan and Tuyserkan Cities, Western Iran and its health risk on the exposed population. Journal of research in health sciences, 19(1), e00441.
Patil, G. R., & Sharma, G. (2020). Urban Quality of Life: An assessment and ranking for Indian cities. Transport Policy.
Sapena, M., Wurm, M., Taubenböck, H., Tuia, D., & Ruiz, L. A. (2021). Estimating quality of life dimensions from urban spatial pattern metrics. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 85, 101549.
Roseland, M., & Spiliotopoulou, M. (2016). Converging urban agendas: Toward healthy and sustainable communities. Social Sciences, 5(3), 28.
Saraswat, I., Mishra, R. K., & Kumar, A. (2017). Estimation of PM10 concentration from Landsat 8 OLI satellite imagery over Delhi, India. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 8, 251-257.
Sepehri, M., Malekinezhad, H., Hosseini, S. Z., & Ildoromi, A. R. (2019). Assessment of flood hazard mapping in urban areas using entropy weighting method: a case study in Hamadan city, Iran. Acta Geophysica, 67(5), 1435-1449.
Sepulveda-Alzate, Y. M., Garcia-Benau, M. A., & Gómez-Villegas, M. (2022). Materiality assessment: The case of Latin American listed companies. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 13(1), 88-113.
Sherman, H. (1950). CHAPTER IX. The Internal Environment and the Quality of Life. In The Nutritional Improvement of Life (pp. 146-163). New York Chichester, West Sussex: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/sher93880-011
Strokal, M., Bai, Z., Franssen, W., Hofstra, N., Koelmans, A. A., Ludwig, F., ... & Kroeze, C. (2021). Urbanization: an increasing source of multiple pollutants to rivers in the 21st century. npj Urban sustainability, 1(1), 1-13.
Tripathi, A. D., Mishra, R., Maurya, K. K., Singh, R. B., & Wilson, D. W. (2019). Estimates for world population and global food availability for global health. In The role of functional food security in global health (pp. 3-24). Academic Press.
Ukko, J., Nasiri, M., Saunila, M., & Rantala, T. (2019). Sustainability strategy as a moderator in the relationship between digital business strategy and financial performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 236, 117626.
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2015). World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision—Highlights. New York: United Nations.
Van Berkum, S., Dengerink, J., & Ruben, R. (2018). The food systems approach: sustainable solutions for a sufficient supply of healthy food (No. 2018-064). Wageningen Economic Research.
Vessali, S, and Tavakkol, M. M (2011). Investigating the effect of social capital on the quality of life in Tehran. Urban Sociological Studies (Urban Studies) Volume 2, Number 2, pp. 197-220.
 
 
 
Wu, H., Li, Y., Hao, Y., Ren, S., & Zhang, P. (2020). Environmental decentralization, local government competition, and regional green development: Evidence from China. Science of the total environment, 708, 135085.
Wu, X., & Zhi, Q. (2016). Impact of shared economy on urban sustainability: From the perspective of social, economic, and environmental sustainability. Energy Procedia, 104, 191-196.
Yari Boroujeni, N., Saedvandi, M., & Bahramian, A. (2020). Achieving Environmental Sustainability in Modern Housing by Introducing Nature. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 22(5), 377-389.
Zabetian, E., & Kheyroddin, R. (2019). Comparative evaluation of relationship between psychological adaptations in order to reach thermal comfort and sense of place in urban spaces. Urban Climate, 29, 100483.
Zare Naghadehi, S., Asadi, M., Maleki, M., Tavakkoli-Sabour, S. M., Van Genderen, J. L., & Saleh, S. S. (2021). Prediction of Urban Area Expansion with Implementation of MLC, SAM and SVMs’ Classifiers Incorporating Artificial Neural Network Using Landsat Data. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10(8), 513.
Zolfagharzadeh, M. M., Khazaei, S., Naghsh, A., & Rad, M. F. (2016). Identification and Ranking Indexes of Evaluation and Selection of Foresight Methods in Cultural Policy Making. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7(1), 80.
 
 
مطالعات ساختار و کارکرد شهری
دوره 10، شماره 36
مهر 1402
صفحه 259-283

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 24 اسفند 1401
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 02 خرداد 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 08 مهر 1402

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار