نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکترا مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه رازی

2 استادیار مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه رازی

چکیده

امروزه باشگاههای ورزشی ناگزیر هستند برای ماندن در بازار رقابتی، انتظارات مشتریان خود را همسو با داراییهایشان برآورده سازند. دراین‌زمینه، بهرة خوشنامی میتواند بستر لازم را فراهم آورد؛ بنابراین، هدف این پژوهش علاوه‌بر معرفی عوامل بهرة خوشنامی، بررسی مدل تأثیر خوشنامی باشگاههای ورزشی بر انتظارات مشتریان بود. جامعة آماری شامل 1300 مشتری باشگاههای استان کرمانشاه (طبق آمار موجود در ادارة تربیت‌بدنی استان) بود که نمونة آماری براساس جدول کرجسی- مورگان برابر با 367 نفر تعیین شد. برای جمعآوری دادهها از دو پرسشنامه استفاده شد: پرسش‌نامۀ بهرة ‌خوشنامی شامل 20 سؤال (81/0=α) و پرسش‌نامۀ انتظارات مشتریان شامل 18 سؤال (83/0=α) که روایی صوری آنها به تأیید 10 تن از اساتید مدیریت ورزشی و بازاریابی رسید. براساس یافتهها، شش عامل (جاذبههای عاطفی، محصولات و خدمات، چشم‌انداز و رهبری، محل و محیط کار، مسئولیتهای اجتماعی و زیست‌محیطی و عملکرد مالی) در بهره خوشنامی باشگاههای ورزشی دستهبندی شدند که ازاین‌میان، تنها، عامل جاذبههای عاطفی و مسئولیت‌های اجتماعی و زیست محیطی نتوانسته بودند بر انتظارات مشتریان تأثیرگذار باشد؛ براین‌اساس، مدیران برای تأمین انتظارات مشتریان خود باید به عوامل مؤثر به آن توجه کنند و راهبردهای نوینی درزمینۀ کسب خوشنامی باشگاه فراهم آوردند؛ زیرا، خوشنامی باشگاه نقش مهمی در انتظارات مشتریان از باشگاه دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Quotient Reputation with Customers' Expectations Sport Clubs

نویسندگان [English]

  • Akram Ghobadi Yeganeh 1
  • Shirin Zardoshtian 2

1 Ph.D. Student in Sport Management, Razi University

2 Assistant Professor of Sport Management, Razi University

چکیده [English]

Today, Sport Clubs are compelled to stay in the competitive market by satisfying the expectations of their customers in line with their assets. "The Quotient reputation", in this context, can provide the necessary ground. So, the purpose of this study, in addition to the introduction of the reputation, was investigated the impact of reputation Clubs model on the customers' expectations. The population consists of 1300 customer of Kermanshah province clubs (according to statistics of the Department of Physical Education) that a sample was set on 367 of people by Kersey- Morgan table. Two questionnaires were used to collect data: the Quotient reputation questionnaire contains 20 questions (α = 0.81) and customer expectations questionnaire contains 18 questions (α= 0.83); that its validity by 10 tons of sports management and marketing was confirmed. The findings, based on six factors (emotional appeal, products and services, vision and leadership, location and working environment, social responsibility and environmental and financial performance) in the sports clubs were classified reputation, of which only operating attractions emotional and environmental responsibilities could not impact on customers' expectations. Accordingly, the managers to meet the expectations of customers need to pay attention to factors affecting it and created new strategy in the field of business reputation of the club because the club reputation of the club has an important impact on our customers' expectations.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Reputation
  • Expectation
  • External Stakeholders
  • Sport Club
  1. Barnett, M., Jermier, M., & Lafferty, B. (2006). Corporate reputation: The Delphi national landscape. Corporate Reputation Review, 1, 26-38.
  2. Cherchiello, P. (2011). Statistical models to measure corporate reputation. The International Conference: Innovation and Society 2011, Statistical Methods for the Evaluation of Services (IES, Winter 2011), Journal of applied quantitative methods,6,4.
  3. Chun, R. (2005). Corporate reputation: Meaning and measurement. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2(7), 91-109.
  4. Dorescou, T., & Salgau, S. (2011). Consumer satisfaction the type of fitness club in Bacau, bulletin of the Transylvania University of Brasov. Bulletin of the Transylvania University of Brasov, 4(1), 115-22.
  5. Dunbar, R. L. M., & Schwalbach, J. (2000). Corporate reputation and performance in Germany. Corporate Reputation Review, 3(2), 115-23.
  6. Feldman, P., Bahamonde, R., & Bellido, I. (2014). A new approach for measuring corporate reputation. RAE, São Paulo, 1(54), 53-66.
  7. Feldner, S., & Berg, K. (2014). How corporations manage industry and consumer expectations via the CSR report. Relations Journal, 8(3), Available at: http://www.prsa.org/Intelligence/PRJournal/Vol8/No3 (Accessed 1-jun-2014).
  8. Fombrun, C. J., & Pan, M. (2006). Corporate reputations in China: How do consumers feel about companies? Corporate Reputation Review, 91(3), 165-70.
  9. Fombrun, C., Gardberg, N., & Sever, J. (1999). The reputation quotient: A multi stakeholder measure of corporate reputation. The Journal of Brand Management, 4(7), 1-29.
  10. Foroudi, P., Jim, Z., & Gupta, S. (2016). Influence of innovation and loyalty. Journal of business research. Available at: http://www. slideshare.net/panteagraph/influence-of-innovation-capability-and-customer-experience (Accessed on lion).
  11. Hong, Y., Shin, D., & Kim, J. (2016). High/ low reputation companies? Dialogic communication Activities and semantic networks on Facebook: A comparative study. Journal of Technological forecasting and social change, 24, 1-12.
  12. Interactive, H. (2012). Harris Poll reputation quotient. Available at: http://www.harrisinteractive.com/Products/ReputationQuotient.aspx (Accessed 15 December 2012).
  13. Jones, G., Jones, B., & Little, P. (2000). Reputation as a reservoir: Buffering against loss in times of economic crisis. Corporate Reputation Review, 3(1),     21-9.
  14. Kanto, D., Run, E., & Isa, A. (2013). Developing an alternative measurement of corporate reputation within the Malaysian context. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 5(1), 730-8.
  15. Landrum, H., Prybutok, V. R., Kappelman, L. A., & Zhang, X. (2008). Serves:  A parsimonious instrument to measure service quality and information system success. The Quality management Journal, 15(3), 17-25.
  16. Mahon, F. (2002). Corporate reputation: A research agenda using strategy and stakeholder literature. Journal of Business & Society, 41(4), 415-46.
  17. Parasurman, A., Zeithaml, V., & Berry, L. (1988). Serqual: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perception of service quality. Journal of Retaining, 64(1), 12-31.
  18. Rak, A. (2013). Brand and corporate image of a sport organization as a factor of building loyalty. Proceedings of 2013 International conference on Technology Innovation and Industrial Management, Phuket, Thailand.
  19. Roberts, P. W., & Dowling, G. R. (1997). The value of a firm's corporate reputation: How reputation helps attain and sustain superior profitability. Corporate Reputation Review, 1(1-2), 72-6.
  20. Rueangthanakiet, P. (2008). Members’ satisfaction of fitness service quality: A case study of california wow experience public company limited. (Master`s thesis). Srinakharinwirot University, in Bangkok, Thailand.
  21. Sandu, M. (2012). Some important definitions and measurement methods of corporate reputation. Annals of the Constantin Brâncuşi, University of Târgu Jiu, Economy Series, (4), 209-12.
  22. Schwaiger, M. (2004). Component and parameter of corporate reputation: An empirical study. Schmalenbach Business Review, 56, 46-71.
  23. Shahverdiani, S. (2010). Design quality measurement tool-based research services Servqual. Journal of Management Accounting, (5), 87-95. (Persian).
  24. Shamma, H. (2012). Toward a comprehensive understanding of corporate reputation: Concept, measurement and implications. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(16), 151-69.
  25. Tomiyama, K. (2012). Understanding the sports organizational reputation. Pster presentation in www.easm2012.com 18-21 September 2012, Aalborg, Denmark.