نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه آزاد واحد تهران مرکزی

2 استاد مدیریت ورزشی مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه آزاد واحد تهران مرکزی

3 استادیار مدیریت ورزشی مدیریت ورزشی، دانشگاه آزاد واحد تهران مرکزی

چکیده

بخشبندی شرکتکنندگان ورزشی و آگاهی از اهداف مشارکت آن‌ها، همواره یکی از اهداف بازاریابان ورزشی بوده است. هدف از پژوهش حاضر، آزمون مدل مفهومی بخشبندی تماشاگران ورزشی با رویکرد مدل پیوستار روان‌شناختی و مقیاس ارزیابی و سیاهة فراغت جدی بود. تعداد ۶۷۰ مرد ۱۸ تا ۶۵ سال تماشاگر مسابقات فوتبال لیگ برتر، به‌صورت هدفمند، تصادفی و داوطلبانه، مقیاس اندازهگیری میزان مشارکت تماشاگران فوتبال بیتون و همکاران (۲۰۰۹) و مقیاس اندازهگیری متغیر پیامدهای مشارکت اسلیم گولد و همکاران (۲۰۰۸) را تکمیل کردند. یافتههای معادلات ساختاری نشان داد که مدل مفهومی مبنی‌بر بخشبندی تماشاگران ورزشی، با استفاده از ترکیب دو مدل پیوستار روان‌شناختی (پی.سی.ام) و مقیاس ارزیابی و سیاهة فراغت جدی (اسلیم) دارای برازش بود. به‌طورکلی، میتوان نتیجه گرفت که ترکیب دو مدل پیوستار روان‌شناختی و ارزیابی و سیاهة فراغت جدی میتواند برای بخشبندی تماشاگران ورزشی و آگاهی از اهداف مشارکت آن‌ها، جهت استفاده و راهنمایی بازاریابان و صاحبان باشگاهها برای طراحی راهبردهای بازاریابی هدفمند و باهدف حفظ و ارتقای تماشاگران به‌سوی وفاداری به‌کار برده شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Examining the Conceptual Model of Sport Spectator Segmentation with PCM and SLIM Approach

نویسندگان [English]

  • aliA Malekian 1
  • Farshad Tojari 2
  • Zahra Haji Anzahaei 3

1 Ph.D. Student of Sport Management, Azad University Central Tehran Branch

2 Professor of Sport Management, Azad University Central Tehran Branch

3 Assistant Professor of Sport Management, Azad University Central Tehran Branch

چکیده [English]

Segmenting of the sport participants and awareness of their participation goals has always been one of the targets of sport marketers. The aim of the present study is to examining the conceptual model of sport spectator segmentation with PCM and SLIM approach. 670 male football spectator in the age range of 18 to 65 years who watched premier league randomly and voluntary were completed measuring scale of participation football fans (Beaton et al, 2009) and measuring scale variation of participation outcomes (Gould et al, 2008).The results of constructive equations indicate that the conceptual model based on integration of psychological continuum model and serious leisure inventory and measure has a great fitness. In conclusion, the integration of psychological continuum model and serious leisure inventory and measure can use to Segmenting of the sport participants and awareness of their participation goals to guide researchers and marketers to design targeted marketing strategy.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • consumer behavior
  • Psychological Continuum Model
  • Serious Leisure
  • Football Spectator
  1. Beaton, A. A., & Funk, D. C. (2008). An evaluation of theoretical frameworks for studying physically active leisure. Leisure Sciences, 30(1), 53-70.
  2. Beaton, A. A., Funk, D. C., & Alexandris, K. (2009). Operationalizing a theory of participation in physically active leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 41(2), 175-203.
  3. Behnam, M., Khabiri, M., Halban, S., Ahmadi, H. R., & Bakhshandeh, H. (2014). Investigating the Levels of Participation of Fans in Selected Iranian Super football League Teams Based on the Psychological Continuity Model. Sport management, 6(1), 135-55. (Persian).
  4. Cialdini, R. B. (2009). We have to break up. Perspectives on psychological science, 4(1), 5-6.
  5. Clyne, B., Bradley, M. C., Hughes, C. M., Clear, D., McDonnell, R., Williams, D., ... & Smith, S. M. (2013). Addressing potentially inappropriate prescribing in older patients: development and pilot study of an intervention in primary care (the OPTI-SCRIPT study). BMC health services research, 13(1), 307.
  6. Doyle, J. P., Kunkel, T., & Funk, D. C. (2013). Sports spectator segmentation: Examining the differing psychological connections among spectators of leagues and teams. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 14(2),    20-36.
  7. Funk, D. C., & James, J. (2001). The psychological continuum model: A conceptual framework for understanding an individual's psychological connection to sport. Sport Management Review, 4(2), 119-50.
  8. Funk, D. C., Beaton, A., & Pritchard, M. (2011). The stage-based development of physically active leisure: A recreational golf context. Journal of Leisure Research, 43(2), 268-89.
  9. Funk, D. C., Filo, K., Beaton, A. A., & Pritchard, M. (2009). Measuring the motives of sport event attendance: Bridging the academic-practitioner divide to understanding behavior. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 18(3), 126.
  10. Funk, D. C., Filo, K., Beaton, A. A., & Pritchard, M. (2009). Measuring the motives of sport event attendance: Bridging the academic-practitioner divide to understanding behavior. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 18(3), 126.
  11. Funk, D., Alexandris, K., & McDonald, H. (2008). Consumer behaviour in sport and events. Routledge.
  12. Funk, D., Alexandris, K., & McDonald, H. (2008). Consumer behaviour in sport and events. Routledge.
  13. Ghasemi H., & Asgari, B. (2013). The media coverage of wrestling and volleyball medals compared to the soccer field in the first half of the sports newspaper. Quarterly Journal of Extension of Communication Management in Sport Media, 1 (2), 56-62.
  14. Gibson, H., Willming, C., & Holdnak, A. (2002). We're Gators… not just Gator fans: Serious leisure and University of Florida football. Journal of Leisure Research, 34(4), 397-425.
  15. Gould, J., Moore, D., Karlin, N. J., Gaede, D. B., Walker, J., & Dotterweich, A. R. (2011). Measuring serious leisure in chess: Model confirmation and method bias. Leisure Sciences, 33(4), 332-40.
  16. Gould, J., Moore, D., McGuire, F., & Stebbins, R. (2008). Development of the serious leisure inventory and measure. Journal of Leisure Research, 40(1),         47-68.
  17. Heere, B., & Dickson, G. (2008). Measuring attitudinal loyalty: separating the terms of affective commitment and attitudinal loyalty. Journal of Sport Management, 22, 227-39.
  18. Hutzler, Y., Barda, R., Mintz, A., & Hayosh, T. (2016). Reverse integration in wheelchair basketball: A serious leisure perspective. Journal of Sport & Social Issues.
  19. Iwasaki, Y., & Havitz, M. E. (2004). Examining relationships between leisure involvement, psychological commitment and loyalty to a recreation agency. Journal of Leisure Research, 36(1), 45-72.
  20. Lee, C., & Payne, L. L. (2016). Experiencing flow in different types of serious leisure in later life. World Leisure Journal, 58(3), 163-78.
  21. Shupe, F. L., & Gagné, P. (2016). Motives for and personal and social benefits of airplane piloting as a serious leisure activity for women. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 45(1), 85-112.
  22. Stebbins, R. A. (1982). Serious leisure a conceptual statement. Sociological Perspectives, 25(2), 251-72.
  23. Stebbins, R. A. (1992). Amateurs, professionals, and serious leisure. Montreal. QC and Kingston, ON: McGill-Queen's University Press.
  24. Stebbins, R. A. (1997). Casual leisure: A conceptual statement. Leisure Studies, 16(1), 17-25.
  25. Stebbins, R. A. (2001). Serious leisure. Society, 38(4), 53-76.
  26. Stebbins, R. A. (2001). The costs and benefits of hedonism: Some consequences of taking casual leisure seriously. Leisure Studies, 20(4), 305-9.
  27. Stebbins, R. A. (2015). The serious leisure perspective. In Leisure and Positive Psychology: Linking Activities with Positiveness (11-40). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
  28. Stewart, B., Smith, A., & Nicholson, M. (2003). Sport consumer typologies: A critical review. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 12(4), 206-16.
  29. Taghizadeh, B., Ghorbani, H. O., Behnam, M. (2015). The Psychological Continuum Mmodel: Examination of Spectators’ Involvement Levels in the Football. Sport Science, 8(1), 64‐71. (Persian).