We use cookies to improve your experience. By continuing to browse this site, you accept our cookie policy.×
Skip main navigation
Aging Health
Bioelectronics in Medicine
Biomarkers in Medicine
Breast Cancer Management
CNS Oncology
Colorectal Cancer
Concussion
Epigenomics
Future Cardiology
Future Medicine AI
Future Microbiology
Future Neurology
Future Oncology
Future Rare Diseases
Future Virology
Hepatic Oncology
HIV Therapy
Immunotherapy
International Journal of Endocrine Oncology
International Journal of Hematologic Oncology
Journal of 3D Printing in Medicine
Lung Cancer Management
Melanoma Management
Nanomedicine
Neurodegenerative Disease Management
Pain Management
Pediatric Health
Personalized Medicine
Pharmacogenomics
Regenerative Medicine
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.2217/nmt.11.83

SUMMARY The current relationship between family caregivers and home care providers needs to be reconceptualized from one that is nonsupportive and potentially exploitive, to one that fosters a collaborative, empowering relationship. I present my argument in three parts. First, I focus on the problem of the current complementary model of care, one in which home care workers supplement and compensate for the care provided by family caregivers. In effect, I outline how this model of dementia home care in Canada perpetuates an inequitable distribution of care between formal and familial caregivers. Here, I underscore the negative consequences of this complementary approach on the caregiver–provider relationship. In the second part, I call for a reappraisal of ‘supportive relationships’ between home support workers and caregivers, identifying underlying values and principles (e.g., quity) that I believe should inform home care practices and policies in the future. Finally, I propose some possible strategies that may ultimately support both family caregivers and providers in promoting optimal dementia home care.

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: ▪ of interest ▪▪ of considerable interest

References

  • Neufeld A, Harrison MJ, Hughes K, Stewart M. Non-supportive interactions in the experience of women family caregivers. Health Soc. Care Commun.15(6),530–541 (2007).
  • Guberman N, Lavoe J, Pepin J, Lauzon S, Motejo M. Formal service practitioners’ views of family caregivers responsibilities and difficulties. Can. J. Aging25(1),43–53 (2006).▪ Based on a qualitative study undertaken in Quebec (Canada), this article identifies home care practitioners’ perceptions of the responsibilities, difficulties and needs for support of caregivers. Although aware of the difficulties facing caregivers and the negative impacts of caregiving, a majority of practitioners had high expectations of caregivers in treatment plans and tended to view family care work as mainly instrumental, ignoring the family relations between caregivers and their relatives.
  • Hokenstad A, Hart A, Gould D, Halpe DR, Levine C. Closing the home care case: clinicians’ perspectives on family caregiving. Home Health Care Manage. Pract.17(5),388–397 (2005).
  • Forbes DA, Markle-Reid M, Hawranik P et al. Availability and acceptability of Canadian home and community-based services: perspectives of family caregivers and persons with dementia. Home Health Care Serv. Quarterly27(2),75–99 (2008).▪▪ The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore the use and satisfaction with home and community-based services for persons with dementia from the perspectives of family caregivers. The findings suggest a need for an integrated continuing care model that includes the person living with dementia and their family caregivers as partners in care.
  • Nolan M, Ingram P, Watson R. Working with family carers of people with dementia: ‘negotiated’ coping as an essential outcome. Dementia1(1),75–93 (2002).▪▪ Using questionnaire data from 156 carers of people with dementia in Australia, this article calls for a reappraisal of the ways in which a successful intervention is defined and promotes a partnership approach in which carers play a significant role in determining ‘what works’.
  • Alzheimer Society of Canada. Rising Tide: The Impact of Dementia on Canadian Society – Executive Summary. Alzheimer Society of Canada, ON, Canada, 1–20 (2010).▪▪ This national report outlines a series of recommendations based on the comparisons of current policies and strategies from various regions of Canada and beyond. In light of the number of people living with dementia, maintaining the status quo is not an option.
  • Smetanin P, Kobak P, Briante C, Stiff D, Sherman G, Ahmad S. Rising Tide: The Impact of Dementia in Canada 2008 to 2038. Risk Analytica, ON, Canada (2009).
  • Cohen CA. Caregivers for people with dementia: what is the family physician’s role? Can. Fam. Physician46,377–380 (2000).
  • Chappell N, Penning M. Behavioural problems and distress among caregivers of people of persons with dementia. Ageing Soc.11,299–317 (1996).
  • 10  Belle S, Burgio L, Burns et al. Enhancing the quality of life of dementia caregivers from different ethnic or racial groups. Am. Coll. Physicians145(10),727–742 (2006).
  • 11  Brodaty H, Thomson C, Thompson C, Fine M. Why caregivers of people with dementia and memory loss don’t use services. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry20(6),537–546 (2005).
  • 12  Mittleman MS, Roth DL, Clay OJ, Haley WE. Preserving the health of Alzheimer caregivers: impact of a spouse caregiver intervention. AMJ Geroatr. Psychiatry15(9),780–789 (2007).
  • 13  Ory MG, Hoffman RR, Yee JL, Tennstedt S, Schulz R. Prevalence and impact of caregiving: a detailed comparison between dementia and non-dementia caregivers. Gerontologist39,177–185 (1999).
  • 14  Pinquart M, Sorensen S. Helping caregivers of persons with dementia: which interventions work and how large are their effects? Intern. Psychogeriatr.18(4),577–595 (2006).
  • 15  Parker D, Mills S, Abbey J. The effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review. Int. J. Evid. Based Health Care6,137–172 (2008).
  • 16  Twigg J, Atkin K. Carers Perceived: Policy and Practice in Informal Care. Open Press, PA, USA (1994).
  • 17  Fortinsky RH. Health care triad and dementia care: integrative framework and future directions. Aging Mental Health5(1),S35–S45 (2001).
  • 18  Mahmood A, Martin-Matthews A. Dynamics of carework: boundary management and relationship issues for home support workers and elderly clients. In: Aging and Caring at the Intersection of Work and Home Life: Blurring the Boundaries. Martin-Matthews A, Phillips JE (Eds). Taylor & Francis/Psychology Press, NY, USA, 21–42 (2008).
  • 19  Chappell N, Blandford A. Informal and formal care: exploring the complementarity. Ageing Soc.11,299–317 (1991).
  • 20  Armstrong P. Relocating care: home care in Ontario. In: Women’s Health in Canada: Critical Perspectives on Theory and Policy. Morrow M, Hankivsky O, Varcoe C (Eds). University of Toronto Press, ON, Canada, 528–553 (2007).
  • 21  Armstrong P, Armstrong H. Thinking it through women, work and caring in the new millennium. In: Caring for/Caring About: Women, Home Care and Unpaid Caregiving. Grant KR, Amaratunga C, Armstrong P, Boscoe M, Pederson A, Willson K (Eds). Garamond Press, ON, Canada, 5–43 (2004).
  • 22  Armstrong P. Health care privatization: women are paying the price. Can. Women’s Health Network5(2–3),7–8 (2002).
  • 23  Fast J, Williamson DL, Keating NC. The hidden costs of informal elder care. J. Family Eco. Issues20(3),301–326 (1999).
  • 24  Ward-Griffin C, Marshall V. Reconceptualizing the relationship between ‘public’ and ‘private’ eldercare. J. Aging Stud.17,189–208 (2003).▪ Data from a critical ethnographic study of community nurses and family caregivers providing care to frail elderly people in Ontario (Canada) are used to analyze the relationships between formal and family caregivers and to illustrate the utility of a new model of care.
  • 25  Ward-Griffin C, McKeever P. Relationships between nurses and family caregivers: partners in care? Adv. Nursing Sci.22(3),89–103 (2000).
  • 26  Glazer N. The home as workshop: women as amateur nurses and medical care providers. Gender Soc.4(4),479–499 (1990).
  • 27  Feder J, Levine C. Explaining the paradox of long-term care policy. An example of dissonant cultures. In: The Cultures of Caregiving: Conflict and Common Ground Among Families, Health Professionals and Policy Makers. Levine C, Murray T (Eds). John Hopkins University Press, MD, USA, 103–112 (2008).
  • 28  Williams A. Restructuring home care in the 1990s: geographical differentiation in Ontario, Canada. Health Place12,222–238 (2006).
  • 29  McWilliam C, Ward-Griffin C, Sweetland D et al. The experience of empowerment in in-home services delivery. Home Health Care Serv. Quarterly20(4),49–71 (2001).
  • 30  Sims-Gould J, Byrne K, Craven C, Martin-Matthews A. Why I became a home support worker: recruitment in the home health sector. Home Health Care Serv. Quarterly29,171–194 (2010).
  • 31  Benzein E, Johansson B, Saveman B. Families in home care: a resource or burden? District nurses’ beliefs. J. Clin. Nursing7,867–875 (2004).▪▪ The aim of this descriptive study was to explore district nurses’ beliefs about families in home care. Study findings highlighted both facilitating and constraining beliefs held by nurses; families can be both a resource and a burden.
  • 32  Ward-Griffin C, Hall J, St-Amant O et al. Managing care resources: client–caregiver-provider relationships in home-based dementia care. J. Aging Res.2012,590724 (2012).
  • 33  Strang V, Koop PM, Peden J. The experience of respite during home-based family caregiving for persons with advanced cancer. J. Palliat. Care18(2),97–104 (2002).
  • 34  Carpentier N, Pomey MP, Contreras R et al. Social care interface in early-stage dementia: Practitioners’ perspectives on the links between formal and informal networks. J. Aging Health20(6),710–738 (2008).
  • 35  McWilliam C, Ward-Griffin C. Implementing organizational changes in health and social services. J. Organizational Change Manag.19(2),119–135 (2006).
  • 36  Stone R. Home and community based care: towards a caring paradigm. In: The Lost Art of Caring: A Challenge to Health Professionals, Families, Communities and Society. Cluff LE, Binstock RH, Baltimore MD (Eds). John Hopkins University, MD, USA, 153–177 (2001).
  • 37  Molyneaux V, Butchard S, Simpson J, Murray C. Reconsidering the term ‘carer’: a critique of the universal adoption of the term ‘carer’. Ageing Soc.31,422–437 (2011).
  • 38  Clemmer S, Ward-Griffin C, Forbes D. Family members providing home-based palliative care to older adults: the enactment of multiple roles. Can. J. Aging27(3),267–283 (2008).
  • 39  Henderson J. ‘He’s not my carer – he’s my husband’: personal and policy constructions of care in mental health. J. Soc. Work Pract.5(2),149–159 (2001).
  • 40  Forbat E. Relationship difficulties in dementia care: a discursive analysis of two women’s accounts. Dementia2(1),67–84 (2003).
  • 41  Nolan MR, Keady J, Aveyard B.Relationship-centred care is the next logical step (Comment). Br. J. Nursing10(12),757 (2001).
  • 42  Hall J, McWilliam C. About the culture of in-home nursing. Home Health Care Serv. Quarterly25(3–4),75–90 (2006).
  • 43  Ryan T, Nolan M, Enderby P, Reid D.‘Part of the family’: sources of job satisfaction amongst a group of community-based dementia care workers. Health Soc. Care Commun.12(2),111–118 (2004).
  • 44  Johns C. Becoming a Reflective Practitioner. Blackwell Science Ltd, London, UK, (2000).
  • 45  McWilliam CL, Hoch J, Coyte P et al. Can we afford consumers choice in home care? Care Manage. J.8(4),10–18 (2007).
  • 46  Cook A. Social inclusion. In: Dementia and Well-Being: Possibilities and Challenges. Dunedin Academic Press Ltd, Edinburgh, UK, 60–70 (2008).
  • 47  Hartrick Doane G, Varcoe C. Relational practice and nursing obligations. Adv. Nursing Sci.30(3),192–205 (2007).
  • 48  Forbes DA, Neufeld A. Invited article: discourse: looming dementia care crisis: Canada needs an integrated model of continuing care now! Can. J. Nursing Res.40(1),9–16 (2008).
  • 49  Torjman S, Makhoul A. The Caledon Institute of Social Policy: Caregivers and Dementia. Maytree, ON, Canada (2008).▪▪ Presents the results of a study that examined the needs of caregivers of people with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementia.
  • 50  Keating N, Dosman D, Swindle et al. Sharing the work: care networks of frail seniors in Canada. In: Aging and Caring at the Intersection of Work and Home Life: Blurring the Boundaries. Martin-Matthews A, Phillips JE (Eds). Taylor & Francis/Psychology Press, NY, USA, 165–184 (2008).
  • 101  Ontario home care association. Home care nursing in Ontario (2011). www.homecareontario.ca/public/ (Accessed 23 November 2011)