Apitherapeutics and phage-loaded nanofibers as wound dressings with enhanced wound healing and antibacterial activity

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest

References

• 1 Abrigo M, Mcarthur SL, Kingshott P. Electrospun nanofibers as dressings for chronic wound care: advances, challenges, and future prospects. Macromol. Biosci. 14(6), 772–792 (2014). •• This review examines the electrospun wound dressings and their use for chronic wound care as well as efforts to develop smart multifunctional electrospun nanofiberous wound dressings.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 2 Vowden P, Vowden K, Carville K. Antimicrobial dressings made easy. Wounds Int. (2011) www.woundsinternational.com
  Google Scholar
• 3 Lansdown AB. Silver 2: toxicity in mammals and how its products aid wound repair. J. Wound Care 11(5), 173–177 (2002).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 4 Kwon YB, Lee HJ, Han HJ et al. The water-soluble fraction of bee venom produces antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects on rheumatoid arthritis in rats. Life Sci. 71(2), 191–204 (2002).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 5 Kim SH, Jung SY, Lee KW et al. Bee venom effects on ubiquitin proteasome system in hSOD1(G85R)-expressing NSC34 motor neuron cells. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 13, 179 (2013).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 6 Fennell JE, Shipman WH, Cole LJ. Antibacterial action of melittin, a polypeptide from the venom. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 127, 707–710 (1986).
  Google Scholar
• 7 Amin MA, Abdel-Raheem IT, Madkor HR. Wound healing and anti-inflammatory activities of bee venom-chitosan blend films. J. Drug Delivery Sci. Technol. 18, 424–430 (2008). • A study on the fabrication, characterization and evaluation of the wound-healing activity of bee venom/chitosan blend films. The possible mechanism of the anti-inflammatory action of the formulation was investigated.
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 8 Han TS, Sutradhar BC, Kim JM, Kim MH, Kim G, Choi SH. Healing effect of bee venom cream to full-thickness skin wound in rabbits. J. Biomed. Res. 13, 47–52 (2012).
  Google Scholar
• 9 Marcucci MC, Ferreres F, Garcia-Viguera C et al. Phenolic compounds from Brazilian propolis with pharmacological activities. J. Ethnopharmacol. 74(2), 105–112 (2001).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 10 Olczyk P, Komosinska-Vassev K, Winsz-Szczotka K et al. Propolis induces chondroitin/dermatan sulphate and hyaluronic acid accumulation in the skin of burned wound. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2013, 290675 (2013).
  Google Scholar
• 11 Sehn E, Hernandes L, Franco SL, Goncalves CC, Baesso ML. Dynamics of reepithelialisation and penetration rate of a bee propolis formulation during cutaneous wounds healing. Anal. Chim. Acta 635(1), 115–120 (2009). • Investigates the dynamics of wound healing of a bee propolis ointment. Photoacoustic spectroscopy demonstrated that the propolis ointment reached to deep region of wound.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 12 Olczyk P, Wisowski G, Komosinska-Vassev K et al. Propolis modifies collagen types I and III accumulation in the matrix of burnt tissue. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2013, 423809 (2013).
  Google Scholar
• 13 Brussow H, Hendrix RW. Phage genomics: small is beautiful. Cell 108(1), 13–16 (2002).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 14 Matsuzaki S, Rashel M, Uchiyama J et al. Bacteriophage therapy: a revitalized therapy against bacterial infectious diseases. J. Infect. Chemother. 11(5), 211–219 (2005). •• This review coves the use of bacteriophages to combat bacterial infections.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 15 Mendes JJ, Leandro C, Corte-Real S et al. Wound healing potential of topical bacteriophage therapy on diabetic cutaneous wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 21(4), 595–603 (2013). • A research study demonstrating the efficacy of using a topical bacteriophage formulation to treat chronic bacterial infection in two animal models of diabetes mellitus.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 16 Seth AK, Geringer MR, Nguyen KT et al. Bacteriophage therapy for Staphylococcus aureus biofilm-infected wounds: a new approach to chronic wound care. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 131(2), 225–234 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 17 Augustine R, Kalarikkal N, Thomas S. Advancement of wound care from grafts to bioengineered smart skin substitutes. Prog. Biomater. 3(2–4), 103–113 (2014). •• A review of skin substitutes including the potential of electrospun nanofibers as skin substitutes.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 18 Augustine R, Dominic EA, Reju I, Kaimal B, Kalarikkal N, Thomas S. Investigation on angiogenesis and its mechanism using zinc oxide nanoparticles-loaded electrospun tissue engineering scaffolds. RSC Adv. 4(93), 51528–51536 (2014).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 19 Sarhan WA, Azzazy HM, El-Sherbiny IM. Honey/chitosan nanofiber wound dressing enriched with allium sativum and cleome droserifolia: enhanced antimicrobial and wound healing activity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8(10), 6379–6390 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 20 Ahmed MBM. Biochemical studies on some products of honey bee [MSc thesis]. Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt (2006).
  Google Scholar
• 21 Aly AKA. Biochemical studies on bee gum [PhD thesis]. Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt (2012).
  Google Scholar
• 22 Sosnowski ZM. US 4382886 A (1983).
  Google Scholar
• 23 Sutjarittangtham K, Sanpa S, Tunkasiri T et al. Preparation of polycaprolactone/ethanolic extract propolis nanofibers films. Adv. Mater. Res. 506, 226–229 (2012).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 24 Sutjarittangtham K, Sanpa S, Tunkasiri T, Chantawannakul P, Intatha U, Sukum E. Bactericidal effects of propolis/polylactic acid (PLA) nanofibres obtained via electrospinning. J. Apic. Res. 53, 109–115 (2014).
  Google Scholar
• 25 Henning L, Mulfinger LM. US 08815296 (1997).
  Google Scholar
• 26 Fontes GC, Calado VMA, Rossi AM, Rocha-Leão MHMD. Characterization of antibiotic-loaded alginate-OSA starch microbeads produced by ionotropic pregelation. BioMed Res. Int. 2013, 472626 (2013).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 27 Sarhan WA, Azzazy HM. High concentration honey chitosan electrospun nanofibers: biocompatibility and antibacterial effects. Carbohydr. Polym. 122, 135–143 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 28 Sharaf S, Higazy A, Hebeish A. Propolis induced antibacterial activity and other technical properties of cotton textiles. Int. J. Boil. Mac. 59, 408–416 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 29 Gjødsbøl K, Christensen JJ, Karlsmark T, Jørgensen B, Klein BM, Krogfelt KA. Multiple bacterial species reside in chronic wounds: a longitudinal study. Int. Wound J. 3, 225–231 (2006).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 30 Yunoki S, Kohta M, Ohyabu Y, Iwasaki T. In vitro parallel evaluation of antibacterial activity and cytotoxicity of commercially available silver-containing wound dressings. Plas. Surg. Nurs. 35, 203–211 (2015). • Evaluated the antibacterial activity and cytotoxicity of several commercial Ag-based wound dressings including Aquacel Ag.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 31 Alvarez-Suarez JM, Gasparrini M, Forbes-Hernández TY, Mazzoni L, Giampieri F. The composition and biological activity of honey: a focus on Manuka honey. Foods 3, 420–432 (2014).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 32 Hider RC. Honeybee venom: a rich source of pharmacologically active peptides. Endeavour 12, 60–65 (1998).
  Google Scholar
• 33 Castaldo S, Capasso F. Propolis, an old remedy used in modern medicine. Fitoterapia 73, S1–S6 (2002).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 34 Azuma K, Izumi R, Osaki T et al. Chitin, chitosan, and its derivatives for wound healing: old and new materials. J. Funct. Biomater. 6, 104–142 (2015). • A review demonstrating the efficacy of chitin and chitosan in wound healing.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 35 Drucker M, Cardenas E, Arizti P, Valenzuela A, Gamboa A. Experimental studies on the effect of lidocaine on wound healing. World J. Surg. 22, 394–398 (1998).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 36 Kim JI, Pant HR, Sim HJ, Lee KM, Kim CS. Electrospun propolis/polyurethane composite nanofibers for biomedical applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 44, 52–57 (2014).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 37 Burd A, Kwok CH, Hung SC et al. Comparative study of the cytotoxicity of silver-based dressings in monolayer cell, tissue explant, and animal models. Wound Repair Reg. 15, 94–104 (2007).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 38 Hodgkinson T, Yuan XF, Bayat A. Electrospun silk fibroin fiber diameter influences in vitro dermal fibroblast behavior and promotes healing of ex vivo wound models. J. Tissue Eng. 5, 2041731414551661 (2014).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 39 Zhong XH, Kim KS, Fang DF, Ran SF, Hsiao BS, Chu B. Structure and process relationship of electrospun bioabsorbable nanofiber membranes. Polymer 43, 4403 (2002).
  Google Scholar
• 40 Lee JS, Choi KH, Ghim HD et al. Role of molecular weight of atactic poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) in the structure and properties of PVA nanofabric prepared by electrospinning. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 93, 1638 (2004).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 41 Mazoochi T, Hamadanian M, Ahmadi M, Jabbari V. Investigation of the morphological characteristics of nanofibrous membrane as electrospun in the different processing parameters. Int. J. Indus. Chem. 3, 2 (2012).
  Google Scholar
• 42 Zargham S, Bazgir S, Tavakoli A, Rashidi AS, Damerchely R. The effect of flow rate on morphology and deposition area of electrospun nylon 6 nanofiber. J. Eng. Fibers Fabrics 7, 42 (2012).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 43 Wang X, Cao J, Hu Z, Pan W, Liu Z. Jet shaping nanofibers and the collection of nanofiber mats in electrospinning. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 22, 536 (2006).
  Google Scholar